Volume 9 Issue 4
Jul.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
LI Yanling, ZHU Changxiong, LI Hongna, GENG Bing. Evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution control technologies based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4): 355-361. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.12.201
Citation: LI Yanling, ZHU Changxiong, LI Hongna, GENG Bing. Evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution control technologies based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4): 355-361. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.12.201
shu

Evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution control technologies based on analytic hierarchy process

  • Agricultural Clear Watershed Group, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Bing GENG E-mail: gengbing2000@126.com

  • Received Date: July 18, 2018
  • Published Date: July 19, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • According to the technical characteristics of agricultural non-point source pollution prevention and control in China, an index system of 14 evaluation indexes including economic benefit, environmental benefit and technical applicability was established. Combining the index system with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), an agricultural non-point source pollution prevention and control technology evaluation system based on AHP was established. By combining the weight of indicators with the score of experts in relevant fields, the technology was comprehensively evaluated to determine the level of technology. The technology evaluation method was applied to evaluate 6 agricultural non-point source pollution prevention and control technologies in 3 categories. It revealed: the evaluation levels of nutrient loss control technology and ecological interception technology for bioactive carbon were neutralization and good respectively; the pollution control technology of microbial fermentation bed of corn straw and UASB+SBR treatment technology were rated as good and medium respectively; the treatment technology of anaerobic-soil purification bed and anaerobic-falling water oxygenation-contact oxidation-artificial wetland were rated as medium. The technical evaluation method is applicable to the comparison and screening of different single technologies in the prevention and control of different types of agricultural non-point source pollution.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (21)
  • [1]
    环境保护部, 国家统计局, 农业部. 第一次全国污染源普查公报[A/OL].( 2010 -02-11)[2018-07-10]. http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201002/t20100210_185698.htms.
    [2]
    佟笑 . 基于层次分析法的刊物影响因子的关键影响因素研究[J]. 沈阳工程学院学报(社会科学版), 2018,14(1):82-87.

    TONG X . Research on the key influencing factors of journal impact factors based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering (Social Sciences), 2018,14(1):82-87.
    [3]
    童娟 . 基于层次分析法的大学生就业质量评价[J]. 现代电子技术, 2018,41(7):160-164.

    TONG J . College students employment quality evaluation based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2018,41(7):160-164.
    [4]
    肖永华, 郭川印 . 层次分析法在确定炼化设计企业绩效考核指标权重中的应用[J]. 当代化工, 2018,47(2):396-399.

    XIAO Y H, GUO C Y . Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in determining the weights of performance evaluation indexes in refinery and petrochemical enterprises[J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2018,47(2):396-399.
    [5]
    田伟, 张岚, 王波 . 基于层次分析法的区域医疗中心评价指标体系研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2018,45(6):1052-1055.

    TIAN W, ZHANG L, WANG B . Research on evaluation index system of regional medical center based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2018,45(6):1052-1055.
    [6]
    李丛, 段亮, 宋永会 , 等. 辽河流域水污染治理技术评估软件的开发与应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2011,1(4):348-352.
    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2011.04.059

    LI C, DUAN L, SONG Y H , et al. The development and application of water pollution treatment technology assessment software for Liao River Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2011,1(4):348-352. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2011.04.059
    [7]
    李蕊, 宋永会, 段亮 , 等. 基于模糊-灰色评价法集成的工业废水处理技术评估研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2011,1(4):344-347.
    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2011.04.058

    LI R, SONG Y H, DUAN L , et al. Study on industrial wastewater treatment technology assessment based on fuzzy and grey integrated evaluation method[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2011,1(4):344-347. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2011.04.058
    [8]
    肖新成 . 重庆三峡库区农业面源污染防治研究:基于农户参与、政府主导的视角[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2015.
    [9]
    李凯 . 农业面源污染与农产品质量安全源头综合治理:以浙江省蔬菜产业为例的机制与推广研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2016.
    [10]
    周早弘 . 农业面源污染实证分析与政策选择[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2009.
    [11]
    曲环 . 农业面源污染控制的补偿理论与途径研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2007.
    [12]
    朱昌雄, 黄亚丽 . 生物资源与农业面源污染防治[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2011.
    [13]
    邓小云 . 农业面源污染防治法律制度研究[D]. 青岛:中国海洋大学, 2012.
    [14]
    王学军, 郭亚军 . 基于G1法的判断矩阵的一致性分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006,14(3):65-70.

    WANG X J, GUO Y J . Analyzing the consistency of comparison matrix based on G1 method[J]. China Journal of Management Science, 2006,14(3):65-70.
    [15]
    鄢恒珍 . 小城镇污水处理方案技术经济分析[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2003.
    [16]
    王忠敏, 梅凯 . 氮磷生态拦截技术在治理太湖流域农业面源污染中的应用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012,40(8):336-338.
    [17]
    肖佳华 . 生态养猪发酵床垫料原料替代技术研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 2012.
    [18]
    蒋建明, 闫俊山, 白建勇 . 微生物发酵床养猪模式的关键技术研究与应用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013,41(9):173-176.
    [19]
    李艳苓, 耿兵, 朱昌雄 . 畜禽养殖业面源污染微生物发酵床控制技术应用与防治建议[J]. 中国猪业, 2017(7):25-29.
    [20]
    GUO H, GENG B, ZHU C X , et al. Characterization of bacterial consortium and its application in an ectopic fermentation system[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,139:28-33.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.029
    [21]
    田宁宁, 王凯军 . 固液分离-UASB-SBR技术处理酒精糟液工程[J]. 给水排水, 2000,26(9):49-51.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(16)

    1. Yan Shen，Tongran Wu，Aiping Lian，Jie Gao，Fei Peng，Guohua Song，Xuefang Wu，Yangyang Cui，Xinyu Liu，Yunfei Wan，Jing Yan，Yifeng Xue. Dynamic emission characteristics and control strategies of air pollutants from motor vehicles in downtown Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2024(02): 637-646 .
    2. 陈振瑜，何超，李加强，付明亮，徐加臣，李菊. 昆明市高速公路机动车温室气体排放清单及时空性分布特征. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(01): 8-16 . 本站查看
    3. 张启阳，王花兰，聂挺，李若菡. 道路交通排放对周边环境影响的分析——以兰州市安宁区学府路为例. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(04): 1225-1231 . 本站查看
    4. 吐尔逊·买买提，马洁，刘志成，陈俊豪. 基于维度规约的快速路全时段排放模型适应性研究. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2023(01): 245-253 .
    5. 叶贺勇，樊守彬，李婷婷，王亚洲，龙腾. 北京市机动车排放趋势与协同控制情景分析. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(04): 1454-1463 . 本站查看
    6. 丘建栋，徐祥，屈新明，暨育雄. 城市道路交通移动源碳排放核算方法. 城市交通. 2023(04): 77-86 .
    7. 王海斌，樊守彬，韩力慧，李婷婷，曲松，崔浩然，刘俊芳. 北京市通州区秋季典型工地出口道路尘负荷排放特征. 环境工程技术学报. 2022(01): 6-14 . 本站查看
    8. 黄志辉，纪亮，尹洁，吕晨，王军方，尹航，丁焰，蔡博峰，严刚. 中国道路交通二氧化碳排放达峰路径研究. 环境科学研究. 2022(02): 385-393 .
    9. 解淑霞，黄志辉，王鑫，唐祎骕，何巍楠，纪亮，王燕军，倪红. 阳泉市2017年基于交通流量的机动车排放清单. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(02): 226-233 . 本站查看
    10. 胡希. 新冠疫情期间城市空气质量状况分析. 广州化工. 2021(15): 165-167 .
    11. 张月帆，陈建华，李冬，高健. 道路扬尘控制措施及其效率评估研究进展. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(05): 845-854 . 本站查看
    12. 沈岩，武彤冉，闫静，李韧菲，崔阳阳，刘欣宇，樊守彬，翟冀飞，曹西子，万芸菲，薛亦峰. 基于COPERT模型北京市机动车大气污染物和二氧化碳排放研究. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(06): 1075-1082 . 本站查看
    13. 张隅希，段宗涛，朱依水，王路阳，周祎，郭宇. 机动车油耗模型研究综述. 计算机工程与应用. 2021(24): 14-26 .
    14. 黄光球，马蒙，陆秋琴. 城市路网系统大气污染物排放量计算方法. 系统工程理论与实践. 2020(07): 1856-1869 .
    15. 亓浩雲，樊守彬，王凯. 北京市不同功能区机动车排放特征研究. 环境污染与防治. 2019(09): 1056-1063+1069 .
    16. 丁剑，王建. 基于道路交通流量对江苏省机动车路网动态排放清单的研究. 科技创新导报. 2019(35): 125-127 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (531) PDF downloads (205) Cited by(25)
    Related

    Copyright © Editorial Department of Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology

    京ICP备05031605号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return