Volume 9 Issue 4
Jul.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
LI Liang, CAO Xinran, PANG Yan, XU Qiujin, HU Xiaozhen, GUAN Heqing. Evaluation of rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4): 349-354. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.060
Citation: LI Liang, CAO Xinran, PANG Yan, XU Qiujin, HU Xiaozhen, GUAN Heqing. Evaluation of rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4): 349-354. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.060
shu

Evaluation of rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin

  • 1. Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, China National Nuclear Corporation,Beijing 101149, China

  • 2. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

  • 3. Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    XU Qiujin E-mail: xuqj@craes.org.cn

    HU Xiaozhen E-mail: huxz@craes.org.cn

  • Received Date: September 09, 2018
  • Published Date: July 19, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The evaluation of water pollution treatment technologies is of great significance to understand the current situation and level of technologies. According to the technical characteristics of rural domestic wastewater treatment in Lake Erhai Basin, a fully quantified technical evaluation index system was established, including 8 indicators in economic benefit, environmental benefit and technical level. Based on expert consultation and analytic hierarchy process, the calculation method of technical benefit evaluation was put forward, and five rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin were evaluated, including a whole set of wastewater treatment technology from perimeter of the lake bay, the anaerobic pond and surface flow wetland technology, the FMBR technology for mixed wastewater of living and farming, the integrated technology of living and farming wastewater treatment, the integrated technology of anaerobic pond and soil treatment tank. The results showed that the comprehensive benefit (A) score of the five technologies was 6.11-8.19. The integrated technology of anaerobic pond and soil treatment tank, and the integrated technology of living and farming wastewater treatment were excellent, and the other three technologies were good. As the technologies are applied according to the results of the technology evaluation, the appropriate technologies should be selected according to the results of the itemized evaluation of technical and economic benefits and environmental benefits.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    许秋瑾, 胡小贞, 林明利 , 等. 流域水体污染控制与治理技术集成及效益评价[N]. 中国环境报, 2018-07-16(004).
    [2]
    解洪兴, 杨晓航, 谭清良 , 等. 运用技术示范评价助力蓝天保卫战[N]. 中国环境报, 2018 -04-03(003).
    [3]
    许春莲, 宋乾武, 黄海明 , 等. 我国环境技术验证(ETV)评价体系建设研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2011,1(5):396-402.
    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2011.05.066

    XU C L, SONG Q W, HUANG H M , et al. Study on the framework of environmental technology verification (ETV) system in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2011,1(5):396-402. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2011.05.066
    [4]
    邓双, 孙现伟, 束韫 , 等. 燃煤电厂烟气一次PM2.5控制技术的综合评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(3):1157-1164.

    DENG S, SUN X W, SHU Y , et al. Comprehensive assessment of primary PM2.5control technologies for coal-fired power plants[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(3):1157-1164.
    [5]
    廖海涛 . 污水处理厂污泥处理处置技术评价[J]. 环境与发展, 2017,29(3):89-91.

    LIAO H T . Analysis on the technology of sludge treatment and disposal in sewage treatment plant[J]. Environment and Development, 2017,29(3):89-91.
    [6]
    王涛, 楼上游 . 中国城市污水处理工艺现状调查与技术经济指标评价[J]. 给水排水, 2004,30(5):1-4.
    [7]
    俞庭康, 杨健 . 城镇污水处理最佳实用技术新进展[J]. 环境污染治理技术与设备, 2000,1(5):54-60.

    YU T K, YANG J . The new best practical environmental options of sewage treatment[J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2000,1(5):54-60.
    [8]
    李友平, 尹华强 . 燃煤电厂烟气脱硫技术综合评价研究[J]. 四川环境, 2008,27(2):64-66.
    [9]
    杨忠权, 吴颖, 袁德美 . 德尔菲法的定量探讨[J]. 情报理论与实践, 1995(5):12-15.
    [10]
    SAATY T L . The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York:McGraw Hill, 1980.
    [11]
    BOTTERO M, COMINO E, RIGGIO V . Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2011,26(10):1211-1224.
    [12]
    CHANG N B, CHANG Y H, CHEN H W . Fair fund distribution for a municipal incinerator using GIS-based fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,90(1):441-454.
    [13]
    DEY P K, RAMCHARAN E K . Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008,88(4):1384-1395.
    [14]
    HALIDE H, STIGEBRAND A, REHBEIN M , et al. Developing a decision support system for sustainable cage aquaculture[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2009,24(6):694-702.
    [15]
    李艳苓, 朱昌雄, 李红娜 , 等. 基于层次分析法的农业面源污染防治技术评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019,9(3):355-361.

    LI Y L, ZHU C X, LI H N , et al. Evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution control technology based analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Environmental engineering Technology, 2019,9(3):355-361.
    [16]
    李达, 王崑声, 马宽 . 技术成熟度在国家科技重大专项评价中的应用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2006,36(1):153-157.

    LI D, WANG K S, MA K . The application of technology readiness in the evaluation of major state science and technology projects[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2006,36(1):153-157.
    [17]
    王心, 姜琦, 魏东洋 , 等. 水专项技术的分类及其就绪度评价[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017(1):69-74.

    WANG X, JIANG Q, WEI D Y , et al. Research on technical classification and readiness assessment of water special techniques[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2017(1):69-74.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 窦嘉顺，吕兴菊，左艳洁，杨四坤. 洱海流域污水治理历程与治理对策分析. 环境保护与循环经济. 2024(09): 104-110 .
    2. 侯峥，李婵媛，常胜，孙泽萍，杜明辉，孙晓明. 水污染控制在石化园区生态化建设中的水绩效评价研究. 环境科学导刊. 2023(01): 82-88 .
    3. 王颖，王月，吴昌永，范帅，王浩. 西北生态脆弱区畜禽粪污处理技术综合评价. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(02): 654-662 . 本站查看
    4. 杨延梅，高达铭，赵健，籍瑶，苏婧. 基于直觉模糊—熵权—TOPSIS的农业面源污染防治技术综合评价方法研究. 中国农村水利水电. 2023(05): 18-25+40 .
    5. 何舸. 国土空间规划背景下的山体生态修复规划研究——以南宁市为例. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(03): 1234-1241 . 本站查看
    6. 方涛，李朝辉，杨成，李馥，何异. 洱海流域截污治污体系设计与施工及运维技术探讨. 中国给水排水. 2022(10): 147-152 .
    7. 叶家慧，胡梦甜，韩永伟，高馨婷，刘辉. 芹菜面源污染防治种植模式综合效益评估. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(02): 283-290 . 本站查看
    8. 阮久莉，王艺博，郭玉文. 基于层次分析-模糊综合评价法的锌冶炼行业水污染控制技术评价. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(05): 976-982 . 本站查看
    9. 陆海，张先智，吴程，靳涵丞. 洱海流域农村生活用水与污水排放调查分析. 环境影响评价. 2020(06): 20-25 .
    10. 李君. 河南省农村水污染现状和关键防治对策探究. 开封大学学报. 2020(03): 80-85 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (666) PDF downloads (225) Cited by(15)
    Related

    Copyright © Editorial Department of Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology

    京ICP备05031605号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return