Volume 9 Issue 3
May  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology  > 2019  >  9(3): 213-222
ZHANG Tianhang, CHI Qianyuan, RAO Xiaoqin, WANG Jikang, ZHANG Bihui, XU Ran, JIANG Qi, LUAN Tian. Verification of national subjective and objective air quality forecast in 2018 by TS score[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(3): 213-222. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.03.080
Citation: ZHANG Tianhang, CHI Qianyuan, RAO Xiaoqin, WANG Jikang, ZHANG Bihui, XU Ran, JIANG Qi, LUAN Tian. Verification of national subjective and objective air quality forecast in 2018 by TS score[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(3): 213-222. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.03.080
shu

Verification of national subjective and objective air quality forecast in 2018 by TS score

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.03.080

  • 1. National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China

  • 2. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoqin RAO E-mail: raoxq@cma.gov.cn
  • Received Date: 2019-01-31
  • Publish Date: 2019-05-20
    Abstract
  • Until now, few works have reported comparison results between subjective and objective air quality forecast. To understand the performances of national subjective and objective air quality forecast, operational results in 2018 from National Meteorological Center were verified by threat score (TS) method. The results showed that TS score, false alarm ratio and missed alarm ratio of subjective (objective) forecast for mild and above pollution all over China in 2018 were 0.23-0.34 (0.24-0.26), 0.37-0.43 (0.39-0.41) and 0.58-0.72 (0.68-0.71), respectively. This illustrated that subjective forecast was better than objective one, but the ability of objective forecast was close to subjective forecast. Performances of subjective and objective forecast were both better in regions with heavier pollution (Jing-Jin-Ji, Fenwei Plain, Central China and Yangtze River Delta) than in lower pollution ones (Northwestern China, Southwestern China, Pearl River Delta and Northeastern China), and so did it in the heavily polluted winter than in the clean summer. With the extension of forecast time, TS scores of subjective forecast showed a downward trend, but scores of objective forecast did not change too much. In winter with heavy pollution, TS scores of 48 and 72 hours' objective forecast were higher than those of subjective forecast. Additionally, in 5 haze processes in 2018, TS scores of subjective (objective) forecast for mild, moderate and severer pollution all over China were 0.39-0.57 (0.43-0.46), 0.22-0.46 (0.25-0.30) and 0.10-0.34 (0.10-0.18), respectively. The situation of TS scores of subjective forecast higher than objective forecast accounted for 3 times in 5 processes. But performance of objective forecast was more stable with extension of forecast time, which illustrated that objective forecast could provide stable reference to forecasters in pollution process, but its ability in dealing with high pollution needs to be improved.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    吕梦瑶, 程兴宏, 张恒德 , 等. 基于自适应偏最小二乘回归法的CUACE模式污染物预报偏差订正改进方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018,38(7):2735-2745.

    LÜ M Y, CHENG X H, ZHANG H D , et al. Improving the correction method of air pollutant forecasts from the CUACE model based on the adapting partial least square regression technique[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018,38(7):2735-2745.
    [2]
    ZHANG T H, ZHANG H D, ZHANG B H, et al. Multi-model ensemble forecast system for surface-layer PM2.5 concentration in China [C]//Signal and information processing,networking and computers:ICSINC 2018.Singapore:Springer, 2019: 462-470.
    [3]
    GORLINE J L, LEE P . Performance evaluation of NOAA-EPA developmental aerosol forecasts[J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2009,9:102-120.
    doi: 10.1007/s10652-008-9090-7
    [4]
    杨关盈, 邓学良, 吴必文 , 等. 基于CUACE模式的合肥地区空气质量预报效果检验[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017,33(1):51-57.
    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2017.01.007

    YANG G Y, DENG X L, WU B W , et al. Verification of CUACE model in Hefei,Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2017,33(1):51-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2017.01.007
    [5]
    麦健华, 于玲玲, 邓涛 , 等. 基于GRAPES-CMAQ的中山市空气质量预报系统预报效果评估[J]. 热带气象学报, 2018,34(1):78-86.
    doi: 10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2018.01.008

    MAI J H, YU L L, DENG T , et al. Assessments of forecast products of air quality forecasting system based on GRAPES-CMAQ in Zhongshan City[J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2018,34(1):78-86. doi: 10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2018.01.008
    [6]
    ZHOU G Q, XU J M, XIE Y , et al. Numerical air quality forecasting over eastern China:an operational application of WRF-Chem[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017,153:94-108.
    doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.020
    [7]
    张恒德, 张庭玉, 李涛 , 等. 基于BP神经网络的污染物浓度多模式集成预报[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(4):1242-1256.
    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.04.004

    ZHANG H D, ZHANG T Y, LI T , et al. Forecast of air quality pollutants’concentrations based on BP neural network multi-model ensemble method[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(4):1242-1256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.04.004
    [8]
    瞿元昊, 许建明, BRASSEUR G , 等. 利用多模式最优集成方法预报上海PM2.5[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018,38(9):3449-3456.

    QU Y H, XU J M, BRASSEUR G , et al. Application of OCF on PM2.5 forecast in Shanghai[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018,38(9):3449-3456.
    [9]
    王占山, 李云婷, 孙峰 , 等. 北京市空气质量预报体系介绍及红色预警支撑[J]. 环境科技, 2016,29(2):38-46.
    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4829.2016.02.009

    WANG Z S, LI Y T, SUN F , et al. Introduction of air quality of Beijing forecast system and the support for the red alert[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2016,29(2):38-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4829.2016.02.009
    [10]
    邓雪娇, 胡胜, 闫敬华 . 主客观天气预报质量对比分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 2003,14(6):729-738.
    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2003.06.012

    DENG X J, HU S, YAN J H . A comparing analysis on subjective and objective weather forecast[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2003,14(6):729-738. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2003.06.012
    [11]
    GIAIOTTI D, STEL F . A comparison between subjective and objective thunderstorm forecasts[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2001,56:111-126.
    doi: 10.1016/S0169-8095(00)00093-4
    [12]
    王雨 . 2002年主汛期国家气象中心主客观降水预报对比检验[J]. 气象, 2003,29(5):21-25.
    doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2003.5.005

    WNAG Y . Verification of NMC subjective and objective precipitation prediction during the main flood season in 2002[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2003,29(5):21-25. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2003.5.005
    [13]
    许映龙, 刘振坤, 董林 , 等. 2002年西北太平洋和南海热带气旋路径主客观预报评价[J]. 气象, 2005,31(6):43-46.
    doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2005.6.009

    XU Y L, LIU Z K, DONG L , et al. Verification of subjective and objective track forecast of tropical cyclones over northwest pacific and south China sea in 2002[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2005,31(6):43-46. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2005.6.009
    [14]
    吴乃庚, 曾沁, 刘段灵 , 等. 日极端气温的主客观预报能力评估及多模式集成网格释用[J]. 气象, 2017,43(5):581-590.
    doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2017.05.007

    WU N G, ZENG Q, LIU D L , et al. Evaluation on subjective and objective diurnal extreme temperature forecasts and multi-model consensus gridded forecast application[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2017,43(5):581-590. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2017.05.007
    [15]
    曹勇, 刘凑华, 宗志平 , 等. 国家级格点化定量降水预报系统[J]. 气象, 2016,42(12):1476-1482.
    doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2016.12.005

    CAO Y, LIU C H, ZONG Z P , et al. State level gridded quantitative precipitation forecasting system[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2016,42(12):1476-1482. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2016.12.005
    [16]
    张碧辉, 桂海林, 王继康 , 等. 2018年大气环境气象公报[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2019: 4-6.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(969) PDF Downloads(218) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Editorial Department of Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology

    京ICP备05031605号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return