Volume 11 Issue 5
Sep.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology  > 2021  >  11(5): 976-982
Jiuli RUAN, Yibo WANG, Yuwen GUO. Research on water pollution control technology assessment in zinc smelting industry based on AHP-FCE[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(5): 976-982. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210032
Citation: Jiuli RUAN, Yibo WANG, Yuwen GUO. Research on water pollution control technology assessment in zinc smelting industry based on AHP-FCE[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(5): 976-982. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210032
shu

Research on water pollution control technology assessment in zinc smelting industry based on AHP-FCE

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210032

  • State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Ecological Industry, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Yuwen GUO E-mail: guoyw@craes.org.cn
  • Received Date: 2021-02-02
  • Publish Date: 2021-09-20
    Abstract
  • The evaluation index system of water pollution control technology of zinc smelting industry was constructed, the analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (AHP-FCE) model was developed, and the evaluation standards of water pollution control technology of zinc smelting industry were established in two technical units: the complete set of pollution control technology for waste acid and acid wastewater and the complete set of comprehensive wastewater treatment and reuse technology. Then the comprehensive quantitative evaluation of eight pollution control technologies in two technical units was carried out based on AHP-FCE. The results showed that: The comprehensive evaluation score of the key technology of waste acid resource treatment based on “selective adsorption-gas-liquid enhanced sulphidation-evaporation concentration-fluorine chlorine separation” was 4.38, which was the best of the four waste acid and acid wastewater pollution control technologies; the comprehensive evaluation score of the heavy metal smelting wastewater biophysical and chemical combination treatment and reuse technology based on “biological agent advanced treatment technology of heavy metal wastewater” was 4.14, which was the best of the four comprehensive wastewater treatment technologies. The evaluation results couldprovide a reliable basis for enterprises to choose suitable water pollution control technology, and also provide a strong support for the management department to recommend the best feasible technology and formulate relevant policies and standards.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(21)
  • [1]
    任岩军, 张铮, 何京东, 等. 我国燃煤电厂大气汞控制技术综合评估与对策探讨[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(4):841-848.

    REN Y J, ZHANG Z, HE J D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and countermeasures of atmospheric mercury pollution control technology in coal-fired power plants[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(4):841-848.
    [2]
    李梁, 曹欣然, 庞燕, 等. 洱海流域农村生活污水治理技术评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019, 9(4):349-354.

    LI L, CAO X R, PANG Y, et al. Evaluation of rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4):349-354.
    [3]
    XU G, YANG Y P, LU S Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of coal-fired power plants based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(5):2343-2351.
    doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.054
    [4]
    CHEN T, SHEN D S, JIN Y Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of environ-economic benefits of anaerobic digestion technology in an integrated food waste-based methane plant using a fuzzy mathematical model[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 208:666-677.
    doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.082
    [5]
    SCHNEIDER P J, EVANIEW N, MCKAY P, et al. Moving forward through consensus:a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in orthopaedic oncology[J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2017, 475(12):3044-3055.
    doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5482-7
    [6]
    LIM D J. Technology forecasting using DEA in the presence of infeasibility[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2018, 25(5):1695-1706.
    doi: 10.1111/itor.2018.25.issue-5
    [7]
    陈欢哲. 新乡市化工行业大气污染物控制技术与成本效益评估研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2019.
    [8]
    PU H X, LUO K L, ZHANG S X. Risk assessment model for different foodstuff drying methods via AHP-FCE method:a case study of “coal-burning” fluorosis area of Yunan and Guizhou Province,China[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 263:74-80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.123
    [9]
    SHAO L N, CHEN G Q. Evaluation of heavy metal pollution prevention technology based on AHP-FCE[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Biological Engineering and Pharmacy(BEP 2016). Paris: Atlantis Press, 2016:223-226.
    [10]
    姜河, 周建飞, 廖学品, 等. 牛皮制革过程污染控制技术评估模型的建立与实证[J]. 中国皮革, 2018, 47(11):40-47.

    JIANG H, ZHOU J F, LIAO X P, et al. Evaluation method development and case analysis of pollution control technologies for cowhide leather manufacturing process[J]. China Leather, 2018, 47(11):40-47.
    [11]
    牟桂芹, 隋立华, 郭亚逢, 等. 石化行业炼油恶臭污染源治理技术评估[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(12):4771-4778.

    MU G Q, SUI L H, GUO Y F, et al. Evaluation of treatment technology of odor pollution source in petrochemical industry[J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(12):4771-4778.
    [12]
    梁静芳. 制药行业水污染防治技术评估方法研究[D]. 石家庄:河北科技大学, 2010.
    [13]
    王谦. 电镀行业六价铬污染防治最佳可行技术评估的研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2013.
    [14]
    田亚静, 姜晨, 吴广龙, 等. 再生铜冶炼过程多氯萘与二噁英类排放特征分析与控制技术评估[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(12):4682-4689.

    TIAN Y J, JIANG C, WU G L, et al. Assessment of emission and co-reduction of PCDD/Fs and PCNs in the secondary copper production sector[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(12):4682-4689.
    [15]
    李旭华, 周长波, 朱宁芳, 等. 电解锰行业污染治理技术评估研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2013, 3(6):514-518.

    LI X H, ZHOU C B, ZHU N F, et al. Evaluation of the technologies for EMM industry pollution control[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2013, 3(6):514-518.
    [16]
    曲久辉, 杨中超, 刘锐平, 等. 一种高浓度含砷酸性废水处理方法及装置:CN103253791A[P]. 2013-08-21.
    [17]
    环境保护部. 铅冶炼污染防治最佳可行技术指南(试行)[A/OL].(2012-01-17)[2021-03-08]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201201/t20120120_222827.htm.
    [18]
    柴立元, 王庆伟, 蒋国民, 等. 污酸资源回收与深度处理方法及装置:CN105439355A[P]. 2016-03-30.
    [19]
    环境保护部. 铅锌冶炼工业污染防治技术政策[A/OL].(2012-03-07)[2021-03-08]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/wrfzjszc/201203/t20120319_224788.htm.
    [20]
    邓国屏, 王化敏. 重金属废水生物制剂深度处理与回用技术在锌冶炼废水处理中的运用[J]. 青海环境, 2013, 23(1):18-20.
    [21]
    李艳萍, 乔琦, 柴发合, 等. 基于层次分析法的工业园区环境风险评价指标权重分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2014, 27(3):334-340.

    LI Y P, QIAO Q, CHAI F H, et al. Study on environmental risk assessment index weight of industrial park based on the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(3):334-340.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(891) PDF Downloads(50) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © Editorial Department of Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology

    京ICP备05031605号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return