Citation: | SHI L Q,GUO L,LÜ C Y,et al.Research status and development trend of the technology for arsenic removal from groundwater[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(5):1548-1554 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210284 |
To clarify the research status and future development trend of arsenic removal from groundwater, the bibliometric method was used to analyze the literature on arsenic removal from groundwater published in the Web of Science (WoS) database from 2008 to 2020, and the comprehensive analysis was conducted from the aspects of the annual number of articles published, publishing organizations, journals, authors, and keywords. The results indicated that: in WoS database, there were 1 501 research papers on arsenic removal from groundwater, and the annual number of publications was on an overall upward trend; the top three countries in terms of publication volume were China, the United States and India; a total of 1 503 research institutions and 4 875 authors participated in the research of arsenic removal from groundwater, in which universities were the main research bases, and university teachers, postgraduate students werethe main force of the research. Keywords analysis showed that the adsorption and electrocoagulation technology were the mainstream methods for arsenic removal from groundwater, the zero-valent iron materials were popular adsorbents applied in the research from 2008 to 2020. At the same time, the emergence analysis showed that the preparation of binary or even multiple oxides and nanocomposites would become the frontier hotspot in the research of arsenic removal from groundwater.
[1] |
SINHA D, PRASAD P. Health effects inflicted by chronic low-level arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global public health challenge[J]. Journal of Applied Toxicology,2020,40(1):87-131. doi: 10.1002/jat.3823
|
[2] |
CHEN Q Y, COSTA M. Arsenic: a global environmental challenge[J]. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology,2021,61:47-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-030220-013418
|
[3] |
ALKA S, SHAHIR S, IBRAHIM N, et al. Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: a mini review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278:123805. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123805
|
[4] |
GHOSH S, DEBSARKAR A, DUTTA A. Technology alternatives for decontamination of arsenic-rich groundwater: a critical review[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation,2019,13:277-303.
|
[5] |
SIDDIQ O M, TAWABINI B S, SOUPIOS P, et al. Removal of arsenic from contaminated groundwater using biochar: a technical review[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2022,19(1):651-664. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-03116-x
|
[6] |
郭丽, 王延荣.地下水污染环境评价探讨[J]. 当代化工研究,2021(13):129-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8114.2021.13.061
GUO L, WANG Y R. Discussion on environmental assessment of groundwater pollution[J]. Modern Chemical Research,2021(13):129-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8114.2021.13.061
|
[7] |
王宝燕, 肖巍.地下水污染现状与防治对策研究[J]. 环境与发展,2020,32(10):38-39.
WANG B Y, XIAO W. Study on the status quo of groundwater pollution and countermeasures[J]. Environment and Development,2020,32(10):38-39.
|
[8] |
SHAJI E, SANTOSH M, SARATH K V, et al. Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula[J]. Geoscience Frontiers,2021,12(3):101079. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.015
|
[9] |
生态环境部. 2018中国生态环境状况公报[A/OL]. (2019-05-29)[2021-06-02].https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywdt/tpxw/201905/t20190529_704841.shtml.
|
[10] |
曾祥裕, 张春燕.印度应对水危机的政策措施评析[J]. 南亚研究季刊,2015(2):84-93. doi: 10.13252/j.cnki.sasq.2015.02.012
ZENG X Y, ZHANG C Y. Water crisis: the Indian response[J]. South Asian Studies Quarterly,2015(2):84-93. doi: 10.13252/j.cnki.sasq.2015.02.012
|
[11] |
环境保护部. 2016中国环境状况公报[A/OL]. (2017-06-05)[2021-06-02].https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201706/t20170605_415442.htm.
|
[12] |
SIK E, KOBYA M, DEMIRBAS E, et al. Combined effects of co-existing anions on the removal of arsenic from groundwater by electrocoagulation process: optimization through response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2017,5(4):3792-3802. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.004
|
[13] |
MOHORA E, RONČEVIĆ S, AGBABA J, et al. Arsenic removal from groundwater by horizontal-flow continuous electrocoagulation (EC) as a standalone process[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2018,6(1):512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.042
|
[14] |
CASTAÑEDA L F, COREÑO O, NAVA J L. Arsenic and hydrated silica removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation using an up-flow reactor in a serpentine array[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2019,7(5):103353. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103353
|
[15] |
GUO H M, STÜBEN D, BERNER Z, et al. Adsorption of arsenic species from water using activated siderite-hematite column filters[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,151(2/3):628-635.
|
[16] |
LI F L, GUO H M, ZHAO K, et al. Modeling transport of arsenic through modified granular natural siderite filters for arsenic removal[J]. Geoscience Frontiers,2019,10(5):1755-1764. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.002
|
[17] |
CHENG Y, ZHANG S S, HUANG T L, et al. Arsenite removal from groundwater by iron-manganese oxides filter media: behavior and mechanism[J]. Water Environment Research,2019,91(6):536-545. doi: 10.1002/wer.1056
|
[18] |
WU K, WANG M, LI A Z, et al. The enhanced As(Ⅲ) removal by Fe-Mn-Cu ternary oxide via synergistic oxidation: performances and mechanisms[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2021,406:126739. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126739
|
[19] |
PAL M, CHAKRABORTTY S, NAYAK J, et al. Removing toxic contaminants from groundwater by graphene oxide nanocomposite in a membrane module under response surface optimization[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2019,16(8):4583-4594. doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-1924-3
|
[20] |
CHOWDHURY T, ZHANG L, ZHANG J Q, et al. Removal of arsenic(Ⅲ) from aqueous solution using metal organic framework-graphene oxide nanocomposite[J]. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland),2018,8(12):1062. doi: 10.3390/nano8121062
|
[21] |
GIFFORD M, HRISTOVSKI K, WESTERHOFF P. Ranking traditional and nano-enabled sorbents for simultaneous removal of arsenic and chromium from simulated groundwater[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017,601/602:1008-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.126
|
[22] |
CHOWDHURY S R, YANFUL E K. Arsenic and chromium removal by mixed magnetite-maghemite nanoparticles and the effect of phosphate on removal[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2010,91(11):2238-2247. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.003
|
[23] |
GUZMÁN A, NAVA J L, COREÑO O, et al. Arsenic and fluoride removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation using a continuous filter-press reactor[J]. Chemosphere,2016,144:2113-2120. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.108
|
[24] |
NEMADE P D, KADAM A M, SHANKAR H S. Removal of iron, arsenic and coliform bacteria from water by novel constructed soil filter system[J]. Ecological Engineering,2009,35(8):1152-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.013
|
[25] |
YANG L, LI X K, CHU Z R, et al. Distribution and genetic diversity of the microorganisms in the biofilter for the simultaneous removal of arsenic, iron and manganese from simulated groundwater[J]. Bioresource Technology,2014,156:384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.067
|
[26] |
SHAKYA A K, GHOSH P K. Concurrent removal of nitrate, arsenic and iron from simulated and real-life groundwater to meet drinking water standards: effects of operational and environmental parameters[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2019,235:9-18.
|
[27] |
THAKUR L S, MONDAL P. Simultaneous arsenic and fluoride removal from synthetic and real groundwater by electrocoagulation process: parametric and cost evaluation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2017,190:102-112.
|
[28] |
POONIA T, SINGH N, GARG M C. Contamination of arsenic, chromium and fluoride in the Indian groundwater: a review, meta-analysis and cancer risk assessment[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2021,18(9):2891-2902. ◇ doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-03043-x
|