Volume 12 Issue 5
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG S Y,CHEN J H,CHEN X L.Evaluation of reduction rate of rainwater runoff pollution load in low impact development community based on rainfall grade differentiation method[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(5):1492-1499 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210413
Citation: WANG S Y,CHEN J H,CHEN X L.Evaluation of reduction rate of rainwater runoff pollution load in low impact development community based on rainfall grade differentiation method[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(5):1492-1499 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210413

Evaluation of reduction rate of rainwater runoff pollution load in low impact development community based on rainfall grade differentiation method

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210413
Funds:  REN B Z.Study on monitoring the operation of facilities in residential sponge project[J].Urbanism and Architecture,2019,16(20):174-176.
  • Received Date: 2021-08-16
  • In order to quantitatively evaluate the reduction rate of low impact development (LID) techniques on rainwater runoff pollution load, Liuan Hefeng Community in Jiaxing City was selected as the LID community, and Bay Community adjacent to it with similar underlying surface types was selected as the traditional community. The external discharge and TP concentration of the communities were monitored simultaneously. Then, the pollution load per unit area of the two communities was calculated according to the rainfall level differentiation under the same rainfall situation. Finally, the reduction rate of rainwater runoff pollution load of LID community was calculated based on the pollution load of unit area of traditional community. The results showed that: In light rain, LID facilities absorbed all the runoff and pollutants within their service range, and achieved a 100% reduction rate of pollution load. With the increase of rainfall, runoff and pollutants carried by it gradually exceeded the functional threshold of LID facilities, and the pollutant abatement rate began to decrease. In moderate rain the reduction rate dropped to 67% and in heavy rain it dropped to 46%. The average annual reduction rate of rainwater runoff pollution load was about 66%. On the whole, the reduction rate of rainwater runoff pollution load of LID facilities showed obvious differences in rainfall levels. The method of rainfall level differentiation could reduce the error caused by rainfall levels and ensure the accuracy of evaluation results, which provided a reliable decision-making basis for LID facility construction in communities.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    住房与城乡建设部. 海绵城市建设技术指南: 低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[S/OL]. [2021-08-10].https://img6.ccement.com/2015/07/20/a9ebe6eb.pdf.
    [2]
    蒲贵兵, 古霞, 蔡岚, 等.“十四五”海绵城市建设发展策略[J]. 净水技术,2021,40(3):1-8.

    PU G B, GU X, CAI L, et al. Development strategy of sponge city construction according to the 14th Five-year Plan[J]. Water Purification Technology,2021,40(3):1-8.
    [3]
    杨正, 李俊奇, 王文亮, 等.对低影响开发与海绵城市的再认识[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(4):10-15.

    YANG Z, LI J Q, WANG W L, et al. The advanced recognition of low impact development and sponge city construction[J]. Environmental Engineering,2020,38(4):10-15.
    [4]
    章林伟.中国海绵城市建设与实践[J]. 给水排水,2018,54(11):1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8471.2018.11.001

    ZHANG L W. Sponge city construction and practice in China[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering,2018,54(11):1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8471.2018.11.001
    [5]
    COFFMAN L S. Low impact development creating a storm of controversy[J]. Water Resources Impact,2001,3(6):7-9.
    [6]
    US EPA. Reducing stormwater costs through lowimpact development (LID) strategies and practices[EB/OL]. (2021-06-14).http://www.epa.gov/nps/lid.
    [7]
    胡爱兵, 丁年, 任心欣. 低影响开发原理、应用和实例简介[C]//多元与包容: 2012中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京: 中国城市规划学会, 2012: 480-494.
    [8]
    孙佩锦.低影响开发应用案例介绍[J]. 住宅与房地产,2017(5):229.
    [9]
    贾续.国外雨洪控制与管理体系概述[J]. 职业时空,2013,9(7):120-122.

    JIA X. Outside the rain flood control and management system overview[J]. Career Horizon,2013,9(7):120-122.
    [10]
    HU M C, ZHANG X Q, LI Y, et al. Flood mitigation performance of low impact development technologies under different storms for retrofitting an urbanized area[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,222:373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.044
    [11]
    高学珑, 陈奕, 蔡辉艺, 等.城市道路雨水排放系统构建及要点研究[J]. 给水排水,2021,57(6):36-42.

    GAO X L, CHEN Y, CAI H Y, et al. Research on construction and key points of urban road rainwater drainage system[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering,2021,57(6):36-42.
    [12]
    孙倩莹, 高艳妮, 张林波, 等.基于土地利用的厦门市生态水文调节服务评估[J]. 环境科学研究,2019,32(1):66-73.

    SUN Q Y, GAO Y N, ZHANG L B, et al. Assessment of ecological and hydrological regulation service of land use in Xiamen City[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2019,32(1):66-73.
    [13]
    冯新伟, 林齐, 段亮, 等.辽河保护区河道防洪能力提升工程研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2013,3(6):493-497. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2013.06.076

    FENG X W, LIN Q, DUAN L, et al. Research on flood control capacity improvement engineering for Liaohe Conservation Area[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2013,3(6):493-497. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2013.06.076
    [14]
    朱文彬, 孙倩莹, 李付杰, 等.厦门市城市绿地雨洪减排效应评价[J]. 环境科学研究,2019,32(1):74-84.

    ZHU W B, SUN Q Y, LI F J, et al. Assessment of the effect of urban green space landscape on reduction of storm water runoff in Xiamen City[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2019,32(1):74-84.
    [15]
    李晓洁, 刘瑞霞, 傲德姆, 等.黑臭水体综合整治案例分析: 以海口市美舍河为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(5):733-739. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200109

    LI X J, LIU R X, AO D M, et al. Comprehensive treatment for black and odorous water body: a case study of Meishe River in Haikou City[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(5):733-739. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200109
    [16]
    《海绵城市建设绩效评价与考核办法(试行)》发布[J]. 建设科技, 2015(14): 6.
    [17]
    毛月鹏, 汪志荣, 史怡然, 等.生物滞留池对屋面径流基本污染物的控制[J]. 环境污染与防治,2020,42(1):29-34.

    MAO Y P, WANG Z R, SHI Y R, et al. Control of basic pollutants in roof runoff by bioretention cells[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control,2020,42(1):29-34.
    [18]
    张庭秀, 李田.浅基质层干植草沟对道路径流中PAHs的去除效果[J]. 中国给水排水,2021,37(11):96-103.

    ZHANG T X, LI T. Removal efficiency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in road runoff by dry grass swale with shallow substrate layer[J]. China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(11):96-103.
    [19]
    李晗, 王建龙, 冯萃敏, 等.低影响开发建筑小区雨水控制效果监测与评估[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(4):145-150.

    LI H, WANG J L, FENG C M, et al. Monitoring and evaluation of stormwater control effect via low-impact development in residential districts[J]. Environmental Engineering,2020,38(4):145-150.
    [20]
    毕军鹏, 程军蕊, 王侃, 等.城市低影响开发对雨水径流氮污染物的控制效应: 以宁波海绵城市试点区域为例[J]. 宁波大学学报(理工版),2020,33(6):70-78.

    BI J P, CHENG J R, WANG K, et al. Control effects of low impact development in urban area on rainwater nitrogen pollution: a case study of the pilot area of sponge city construction in Ningbo[J]. Journal of Ningbo University (Natural Science & Engineering Edition),2020,33(6):70-78.
    [21]
    李佳. 海绵城市地块汇水区面源污染传输及控制效果研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2020.
    [22]
    马学琳, 李洪波, 罗宁, 等.城市地表径流污染研究[J]. 中国资源综合利用,2021,39(5):112-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2021.05.034

    MA X L, LI H B, LUO N, et al. Research on urban surface runoff pollution[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization,2021,39(5):112-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2021.05.034
    [23]
    王生愿, 余黎, 陈小龙, 等.基于在线监测和SWMM模型的合流制排水体制系统化提升方案评估研究[J]. 中国环境监测,2021,37(1):103-111.

    WANG S Y, YU L, CHEN X L, et al. Evaluation of systematic upgrade scheme for combined drainage system based on online monitoring and SWMM[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China,2021,37(1):103-111.
    [24]
    赵明.不同业界暴雨径流计算的异与同[J]. 城市道桥与防洪,2020(10):100-101.

    ZHAO M. Differences and similarities of storm runoff calculation in different industries[J]. Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control,2020(10):100-101.
    [25]
    任兵战.住宅型海绵项目设施运行效果监测研究[J]. 城市建筑,2019,16(20):174-176. ⊗ doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0232.2019.20.060
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(324) PDF Downloads(22) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return