Volume 12 Issue 4
Jul.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XIANG Z J,ZHANG Q,LÜ Q,et al.Comprehensive benefit evaluation of zinc oxide enrichment regeneration for zinc smelting[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(4):1245-1252 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210441
Citation: XIANG Z J,ZHANG Q,LÜ Q,et al.Comprehensive benefit evaluation of zinc oxide enrichment regeneration for zinc smelting[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(4):1245-1252 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210441

Comprehensive benefit evaluation of zinc oxide enrichment regeneration for zinc smelting

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210441
  • Received Date: 2021-08-21
  • Evaluation of the regeneration benefit of zinc oxide enrichment for zinc smelting is of great significance for promoting rational planning of the utilization of regenerated zinc resources and supporting scientific decision-making of environmental management. Based on the survey results of domestic enterprises, an evaluation index system for the comprehensive benefits of zinc oxide enrichment regeneration was established, considering economic, resource, environmental and social factors, where comprehensive weights were obtained by applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and CRITIC method for weighting, and the standard cloud divided by the golden section method was modified. Then a comprehensive benefit evaluation model based on the combination weighting method and cloud model was constructed. After that, a lead-zinc metal company in Jiangxi Province was used as a case study. The results showed that the comprehensive benefit level of the company's zinc production from zinc oxide enrichment regeneration was at a high level. Regarding the first-level factors, the resource benefit was at the highest level; the environmental, social and economic benefits were at the second high level, and the evaluation results of environmental and social benefits were more uncertain. The fuzziness and randomness were considered in the process of evaluation, which provided more comprehensive evaluation information of the regeneration benefit of zinc oxide enrichment for zinc smelting.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    工业和信息化部. 锌冶炼用氧化锌富集物: YS/T 1343—2019[S]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2019.
    [2]
    潘志君, 夏鹏, 朱清, 等.中国锌矿资源开发利用形势分析[J]. 地球学报,2021,42(2):258-264. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2020.110203

    PAN Z J, XIA P, ZHU Q, et al. An analysis of the development and utilization situation of China's zinc ore resources[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica,2021,42(2):258-264. doi: 10.3975/cagsb.2020.110203
    [3]
    王菲, 张曼丽, 王雪娇, 等. 我国铜、铅和锌冶炼过程中危险废物产生与污染特性[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(5): 1012-1019.

    WANG F, ZHANG M L, WANG X J, et al.Generation and pollution characteristics of hazardous wastes from smelting of copper, lead and zinc in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(5): 1012-1019.
    [4]
    KIM J, JEONG S. Economic and environmental cost analysis of incineration and recovery alternatives for flammable industrial waste: the case of South Korea[J]. Sustainability,2017,9(9):1638. doi: 10.3390/su9091638
    [5]
    张晋豫, 阮久莉, 刘才田, 等.基于MFCA的典型再生锌工艺成本优化分析[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(2):310-315. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190109

    ZHANG J Y, RUAN J L, LIU C T, et al. MFCA-based cost optimization analysis for typical secondary zinc production process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(2):310-315. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190109
    [6]
    亓聪聪. 我国湿法冶锌制备生命周期评价[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2018.
    [7]
    宋海燕, 牛建刚, 崔宝霞.钢铁工业固体废弃物利用效益综合评价[J]. 钢铁,2017,52(2):85-90.

    SONG H Y, NIU J G, CUI B X. Comprehensive evaluation of solid waste utilization benefit in iron and steel industry[J]. Iron & Steel,2017,52(2):85-90.
    [8]
    杨洁, 王国胤, 刘群, 等.正态云模型研究回顾与展望[J]. 计算机学报,2018,41(3):724-744. doi: 10.11897/SP.J.1016.2018.00724

    YANG J, WANG G Y, LIU Q, et al. Retrospect and prospect of research of normal cloud model[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers,2018,41(3):724-744. doi: 10.11897/SP.J.1016.2018.00724
    [9]
    杨恒, 刘永强.基于PP-云模型的河道治理工程效益评价研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2020,51(5):118-125.

    YANG H, LIU Y Q. Study on benefit evaluation of river regulation project based on PP-cloud model[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2020,51(5):118-125.
    [10]
    ZHANG L H, CHAI J X, XIN H, et al. Evaluating the comprehensive benefit of hybrid energy system for ecological civilization construction in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278:123769. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123769
    [11]
    YANG Z T, HUANG X F, FANG G H, et al. Benefit evaluation of East Route Project of South to North Water Transfer based on trapezoid cloud model[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2021,254:106960. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106960
    [12]
    LI D Y, LIU C Y, GAN W Y. A new cognitive model: cloud model[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2009,24(3):357-375.
    [13]
    ZHANG L M, WU X G, CHEN Q Q, et al. Developing a cloud model based risk assessment methodology for tunnel-induced damage to existing pipelines[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2015,29(2):513-526. doi: 10.1007/s00477-014-0878-3
    [14]
    WU Y N, TAO Y, DENG Z Q, et al. A fuzzy analysis framework for waste incineration power plant comprehensive benefit evaluation from refuse classification perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,258:120734. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120734
    [15]
    田金枝. 建筑垃圾生产再生骨料的综合效益分析[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019.
    [16]
    DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research,1995,22(7):763-770.
    [17]
    荀志远, 张丽敏, 赵资源, 等.基于组合赋权云模型的装配式建筑成本风险评价[J]. 土木工程与管理学报,2020,37(6):8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0985.2020.06.002

    XUN Z Y, ZHANG L M, ZHAO Z Y, et al. Cost risk evaluation of prefabricated buildings based on combined weighted cloud model[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,2020,37(6):8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0985.2020.06.002
    [18]
    MIAO C, TENG J K, WANG J, et al. Population vulnerability assessment of geological disasters in China using CRITIC-GRA methods[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2018,11(11):1-12.
    [19]
    赵书强, 汤善发.基于改进层次分析法、CRITIC法与逼近理想解排序法的输电网规划方案综合评价[J]. 电力自动化设备,2019,39(3):143-148.

    ZHAO S Q, TANG S F. Comprehensive evaluation of transmission network planning scheme based on improved analytic hierarchy process, CRITIC method and TOPSIS[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment,2019,39(3):143-148.
    [20]
    徐选华, 吴慧迪.基于改进云模型的语言偏好信息多属性大群体决策方法[J]. 管理工程学报,2018,32(1):117-125.

    XU X H, WU H D. Approach for multi-attribute large group decision-making with linguistic preference information based on improved cloud model[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2018,32(1):117-125.
    [21]
    周雪, 左忠义, 程伟.基于组合赋权云模型的铁路旅客运输安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2020,30(增刊1):158-164.

    ZHOU X, ZUO Z Y, CHENG W. Safety evaluation of railway passenger transportation based on combined weighting cloud model[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2020,30(Suppl 1):158-164.
    [22]
    胡长明, 刘林, 王晓华, 等.基于模糊熵-云理论的二维深基坑施工风险评价[J]. 安全与环境学报,2021,21(2):521-528.

    HU C M, LIU L, WANG X H, et al. Risk assessment for the 2-D deep foundation pit based on the fuzzy entropy-cloud theory[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2021,21(2):521-528.
    [23]
    史小棒, 赵云胜, 罗聪, 等.基于云模型的地勘行业安全生产标准化等级评价[J]. 安全与环境工程,2019,26(2):124-128.

    SHI X B, ZHAO Y S, LUO C, et al. Evaluation of safety production standardization level in geological prospecting industry based on cloud model[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2019,26(2):124-128.
    [24]
    梁力, 邢观华, 吴凤元.基于云理论的评估模型和方法[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(6):881-885. doi: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2019.06.022

    LIANG L, XING G H, WU F Y. The evaluation model and method based on cloud theory[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science),2019,40(6):881-885. ⊗ doi: 10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2019.06.022
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(326) PDF Downloads(17) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return