Volume 12 Issue 2
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
QI Y S,LIU R Z,ZHANG Q Y,et al.Scenario simulation analysis of abrupt water pollution in Tongling section of the mainstream of the Yangtze River[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(2):607-614 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210662
Citation: QI Y S,LIU R Z,ZHANG Q Y,et al.Scenario simulation analysis of abrupt water pollution in Tongling section of the mainstream of the Yangtze River[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(2):607-614 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210662

Scenario simulation analysis of abrupt water pollution in Tongling section of the mainstream of the Yangtze River

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210662
  • Received Date: 2021-11-11
    Available Online: 2022-04-02
  • Scenario simulation analysis of abrupt water pollution is important for risk prevention and control and emergency response. Based on the analysis of risky substance leakage scenarios of chemical enterprises, MIKE21, a two-dimensional hydrodynamic-water quality coupling model, was used to simulate the abrupt water pollution accident in the Tongling section of the mainstream of the Yangtze River. The model verification showed the constructed hydrodynamic model could meet the accuracy requirements. The simulation results of three different leakage scenarios for one chemical company's storage tank showed that: in the same hydrological period, the pollution degree and time of risky substances to downstream sensitive receptors were mainly related to the total amount of leakage, and it had the most serious impact on downstream sensitive receptors when the storage tank was leaked entirely, and the maximum pollution peak was 2~3 orders of magnitude higher than 20% and 100% pipe diameter leakage. In different hydrological periods, risk substances took the shortest time to get to downstream sensitive receptors in the wet period, and it took 75 min for the risky material to reach the water intake of the Third Water Plant when the storage tank was leaked completely; but it took 103 min and 111 min during the normal and dry periods, respectively, and the impact time was longer and the concentration was higher. And there were two pollution peaks successively at the water intake of the downstream plant and the outbound section of the city in the normal and dry periods.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    国家突发环境事件应急预案[EB/OL]. (2019-12-27)[2021-10-17]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/hjyj/yjzb/201912/t20191227_751708.shtml.
    [2]
    宋永会, 袁鹏, 彭剑峰, 等.突发环境事件风险源识别与监控技术创新进展: (Ⅰ)环境风险源识别技术与应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2015,5(5):347-352. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2015.05.055

    SONG Y H, YUAN P, PENG J F, et al. Technological innovation progress of risk sources identification and monitoring of sudden environmental pollution accidents: (Ⅰ) risk sources identification technologies and applications[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2015,5(5):347-352. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2015.05.055
    [3]
    陈成健.突发环境事件应急与管理研究[J]. 资源节约与环保,2018(7):122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2251.2018.07.098
    [4]
    李旭, 吕佳佩, 裴莹莹, 等.国内突发环境事件特征分析[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(2):401-408.

    LI X, LÜ J P, PEI Y Y, et al. Analysis of the characteristics of environmental emergencies in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(2):401-408.
    [5]
    李海生, 王丽婧, 张泽乾, 等.长江生态环境协同治理的理论思考与实践[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(3):409-417. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210071

    LI H S, WANG L J, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Theoretical thought and practice of eco-environment synergistic management in the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(3):409-417. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210071
    [6]
    刘录三, 黄国鲜, 王璠, 等.长江流域水生态环境安全主要问题、形势与对策[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(5):1081-1090.

    LIU L S, HUANG G X, WANG F, et al. Main problems, situation and countermeasures of water eco-environment security in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(5):1081-1090.
    [7]
    陈思莉, 黄大伟, 张政科, 等.流域突发水污染事件应急处置工程削污技术[J]. 环境工程学报,2021,15(7):2233-2238. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202008108

    CHEN S L, HUANG D W, ZHANG Z K, et al. Pollution reduction technologies for emergent water pollution disposal in river basins[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2021,15(7):2233-2238. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202008108
    [8]
    李春晖, 田雨桐, 赵彦伟, 等.突发水污染风险评价与应急对策研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2020,39(6):1161-1167. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0411

    LI C H, TIAN Y T, ZHAO Y W, et al. Research progress on risk assessment and emergency countermeasures of sudden water pollution[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2020,39(6):1161-1167. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0411
    [9]
    PAN F H, WANG Y B, ZHANG X X. Emergency measure of soft isolation controlling pollution diffusion response to sudden water pollution accidents[J]. Water Science and Technology:A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research,2019,80(7):1238-1248. doi: 10.2166/wst.2019.368
    [10]
    CHENG T J, WANG P P, LU Q Y. Risk scenario prediction for sudden water pollution accidents based on Bayesian networks[J]. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management,2018,9(5):1165-1177.
    [11]
    张珂, 刘仁志, 张志娇, 等.流域突发性水污染事故风险评价方法及其应用[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报,2014,22(4):675-684.

    ZHANG K, LIU R Z, ZHANG Z J, et al. A method of environmental risk assessment for abrupt water pollution accidents in river basin[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2014,22(4):675-684.
    [12]
    朱瑶, 梁志伟, 李伟, 等.流域水环境污染模型及其应用研究综述[J]. 应用生态学报,2013,24(10):3012-3018.

    ZHU Y, LIANG Z W, LI W, et al. Watershed water environment pollution models and their applications: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2013,24(10):3012-3018.
    [13]
    李林子, 钱瑜, 张玉超.基于EFDC和WASP模型的突发水污染事故影响的预测预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2011,20(8):1010-1016.

    LI L Z, QIAN Y, ZHANG Y C. Forecasting and warning the accidental water pollution effect based on the EFDC and WASP[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2011,20(8):1010-1016.
    [14]
    ZHENG H Z, LEI X H, SHANG Y Z, et al. Sudden water pollution accidents and reservoir emergency operations: impact analysis at Danjiangkou Reservoir[J]. Environmental Technology,2018,39(6):787-803. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1311945
    [15]
    周华.河流综合水质模型QUAL2K应用研究[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2010,8(1):71-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3031.2010.01.012

    ZHOU H. Application research of a comprehensive river water quality model QUAL2K[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,2010,8(1):71-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3031.2010.01.012
    [16]
    郭晓明, 乔明.MIKE21模型在排污口地表水影响预测方面的应用[J]. 四川环境,2021,40(3):117-123.

    GUO X M, QIAO M. Application of MIKE21 model in prediction of environmental impact of sewage outlet on surface water[J]. Sichuan Environment,2021,40(3):117-123.
    [17]
    王晓青, 李哲.SWAT与MIKE21耦合模型及其在澎溪河流域的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(3):426-432. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201503011

    WANG X Q, LI Z. SWAT and MIKE21 coupled models and their application in the Pengxi Watershed[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2015,24(3):426-432. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201503011
    [18]
    袁玥, 师懿, 程胜高.基于二维动态水质模型的长江蕲春段水污染扩散分析[J]. 安全与环境学报,2016,16(1):212-217.

    YUAN Y, SHI Y, CHENG S G. Analysis of water pollution dispersion at Qichun section of the Yangtze River based on the 2-D dynamic water quality model[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2016,16(1):212-217.
    [19]
    WU D A, SHAO Y C, PAN J X. Study on activities and concentration of saline groupin the south branch in Yangtze River Estuary[J]. Procedia Engineering,2015,116:1085-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.349
    [20]
    宫雪亮, 孙蓉, 芦昌兴, 等.基于MIKE21的南四湖上级湖水量水质响应模拟研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2019(1):70-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2019.01.014

    GONG X L, SUN R, LU C X, et al. Research on the water quality and quantity response based on MIKE21 in the upper-reach lakes of Nansi Lake[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower,2019(1):70-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2019.01.014
    [21]
    ZHU C J, LIANG Q, YAN F, et al. Reduction of waste water in Erhai Lake based on MIKE21 hydrodynamic and water quality model[J]. The Scientific World Journal,2013,2013:958506.
    [22]
    XU M J, YU L, ZHAO Y W, et al. The simulation of shallow reservoir eutrophication based on MIKE21: a case study of Douhe Reservoir in North China[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2012,13:1975-1988. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.191
    [23]
    常赜, 张琼海, 姜宇, 等.基于MIKE21模型的入海排污口对澳门近岸海域水质影响分析[J]. 人民珠江,2021,42(3):70-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2021.03.010

    CHANG Z, ZHANG Q H, JIANG Y, et al. Analysis of the impact of sewage outfall on the water quality of coastal waters of Macao based on MIKE21 model[J]. Pearl River,2021,42(3):70-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2021.03.010
    [24]
    舒长莉, 李林, 冯韬.基于MIKE21的河道饮用水源地突发污染事故模拟: 以赣江南昌段为例[J]. 人民长江,2019,50(3):73-77.

    SHU C L, LI L, FENG T. Simulation of emergent water pollution accident in river-type drinking water sources based on MIKE21: case of Nanchang reach of Ganjiang River[J]. Yangtze River,2019,50(3):73-77.
    [25]
    张铃松, 丁文慧, 孟凡生, 等.长江生态环境保护修复咸宁市驻点跟踪研究分析[J]. 环境与可持续发展,2019,44(5):48-50.

    ZHANG L S, DING W H, MENG F S, et al. Research and analysis of stationary tracking in Xianning City of Yangtze River ecological environment protection and remediation[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development,2019,44(5):48-50.
    [26]
    王金南, 孙宏亮, 续衍雪, 等.关于“十四五”长江流域水生态环境保护的思考[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(5):1075-1080.

    WANG J N, SUN H L, XU Y X, et al. Water eco-environment protection framework in the Yangtze River Basin during the 14th Five-Year Plan Period[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(5):1075-1080.
    [27]
    张西斌.铜陵淡水豚国家级自然保护区长江段物种资源现状调查研究[J]. 现代农业科技,2017(11):227-229. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2017.11.141
    [28]
    WARREN I R, BACH H K. MIKE 21: a modelling system for estuaries, coastal waters and seas[J]. Environmental Software,1992,7(4):229-240. doi: 10.1016/0266-9838(92)90006-P
    [29]
    王青青, 吴昊, 王腊春, 等.突发污染事故对水源地的影响研究: 以长江南京段为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(12):1557-1563.

    WANG Q Q, WU H, WANG L C, et al. Study on the impact of sudden pollution on water resources: a case study of Nanjing section of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2019,35(12):1557-1563.
    [30]
    刘晨辉, 刘思飔, 李丹, 等.基于MIKE21模型的长江中环排污口水质影响分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2020(1):72-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2020.01.016

    LIU C H, LIU S S, LI D, et al. An analysis of the impact of Zhonghuan sewage outlet on water quality of the Yangtze River based on MIKE21 model[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower,2020(1):72-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2020.01.016
    [31]
    龙天渝, 屈瑶.长江重庆主城区段突发水污染事故模拟研究[J]. 重庆大学学报,2020,43(10):90-103.

    LONG T Y, QU Y. Simulation of an emergent water pollution accident in the portion of the Yangtze River running through the main urban areas of Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chongqing University,2020,43(10):90-103.
    [32]
    刘晓东.长江下游水域码头硫酸泄漏事故风险评价[J]. 水资源保护,2009,25(3):76-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2009.03.020

    LIU X D. Risk assessment of vitriol leakage accident at wharf in downriver reach of Yangtze River[J]. Water Resources Protection,2009,25(3):76-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2009.03.020
    [33]
    生态环境部. 建设项目环境风险评价技术导则: HJ 169—2018[S]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2019.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(496) PDF Downloads(35) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return