Volume 13 Issue 2
Mar.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Y,WANG Y,WU C Y,et al.Comprehensive evaluation research of livestock and poultry waste treatment technologies in the ecological fragile areas of Northwest China[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(2):654-662 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220080
Citation: WANG Y,WANG Y,WU C Y,et al.Comprehensive evaluation research of livestock and poultry waste treatment technologies in the ecological fragile areas of Northwest China[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(2):654-662 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220080

Comprehensive evaluation research of livestock and poultry waste treatment technologies in the ecological fragile areas of Northwest China

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220080
  • Received Date: 2022-01-24
  • The applicability of livestock and poultry waste treatment technology is quite different in different regions. In order to comprehensively, objectively and scientifically screen out suitable livestock and poultry waste treatment technologies in Northwest China, the life cycle assessment, cost benefit analysis (CBA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods were coupled to establish a screening system for livestock and poultry waste treatment technologies in Northwest China. The system included five factors of technology, economy, climate, direct and indirect environmental impacts, with a total of 18 indicators. Taking the livestock and poultry waste treatment technologies in Lanzhou as an example, the applicability of the technologies of aerobic composting, anaerobic fermentation, and litter utilization were analyzed. The results showed that the comprehensive ranking of the applicability of livestock and poultry waste treatment technologies in Lanzhou City was litter utilization technology (72.21 points)>aerobic composting technology (71.55 points) > anaerobic fermentation technology (68.79 points). It was more suitable to use litter utilization technology in Northwest China. The environmental friendliness of litter utilization technology is obviously better than that of anaerobic fermentation and aerobic composting technologies. The use of aerobic composting and anaerobic fermentation technologies could generate additional profits for the breeding farm. This research could provide guidance for the construction and optimization of livestock and poultry waste treatment technology models in Northwest China.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    程东林, 陈英, 乔蕻强, 等.西北生态脆弱区城市土地生态安全时序性评价: 以兰州市为例[J]. 中国国土资源经济,2020,33(7):83-89.

    CHENG D L, CHEN Y, QIAO H Q, et al. Time series evaluation of urban land eco-security in eco-vulnerable areas of northwest China: a case study of Lanzhou[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China,2020,33(7):83-89.
    [2]
    LI F, CHENG S K, YU H L, et al. Waste from livestock and poultry breeding and its potential assessment of biogas energy in rural China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,126:451-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.104
    [3]
    WANG M L, LIU R H, LU X Y, et al. Heavy metal contamination and ecological risk assessment of swine manure irrigated vegetable soils in Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,2018,100(5):634-640. doi: 10.1007/s00128-018-2315-7
    [4]
    生态环境部, 国家统计局, 农业农村部. 第二次全国污染源普查公报[A/OL]. (2020-06-08)[2021-08-08]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/home/ztbd/rdzl/wrypc/zlxz/202006/t20200616_784745.html.
    [5]
    ALI RAJAEIFAR M, GHANAVATI H, DASHTI B B, et al. Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies: a comparative review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2017,79:414-439. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.109
    [6]
    李红娜, 吴华山, 耿兵, 等.我国畜禽养殖污染防治瓶颈问题及对策建议[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(2):167-172.

    LI H N, WU H S, GENG B, et al. The bottleneck and countermeasures in the pollution control of livestock and poultry breeding in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(2):167-172.
    [7]
    罗娟, 赵立欣, 姚宗路, 等.规模化养殖场畜禽粪污处理综合评价指标体系构建与应用[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(17):182-189.

    LUO J, ZHAO L X, YAO Z L, et al. Construction and application of comprehensive evaluation index system for waste treatment on intensive livestock farms[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(17):182-189.
    [8]
    向欣, 罗煜, 程红胜, 等.基于层次分析法和模糊综合评价的沼气工程技术筛选[J]. 农业工程学报,2014,30(18):205-212.

    XIANG X, LUO Y, CHENG H S, et al. Biogas engineering technology screening based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2014,30(18):205-212.
    [9]
    GARBS M, GELDERMANN J. Analysis of selected economic and environmental impacts of long distance manure transports to biogas plants[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,2018,109:71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.009
    [10]
    RUIZ D, SAN MIGUEL G, CORONA B, et al. Environmental and economic analysis of power generation in a thermophilic biogas plant[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2018,633:1418-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.169
    [11]
    陈励芳, 赵希智, 朱旭鑫.金昌市、武威市和兰州市畜禽养殖粪污资源化利用现状调研报告[J]. 甘肃畜牧兽医,2017,47(11):48-50.

    CHEN L F, ZHAO X Z, ZHU X X. Investigation report on the present situation of resource utilization of livestock and poultry manure in Jinchang, Wuwei and Lanzhou[J]. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary,2017,47(11):48-50.
    [12]
    罗长健.畜禽粪便好氧堆肥处理技术探讨[J]. 河南农业,2019(18):46-47.

    LUO C J. Discussion on aerobic composting treatment technology of livestock manure[J]. Agriculture of Henan,2019(18):46-47.
    [13]
    裴忠良. 集约化猪场粪便处理的生命周期评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2012.
    [14]
    曾雅琼, 施正香, 王盼柳.牛粪垫料再生系统温室气体排放及其对环境的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2018,23(7):66-74.

    ZENG Y Q, SHI Z X, WANG P L. Research on greenhouse gas emissions of bedding recovery unit system and its impact on environment[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University,2018,23(7):66-74.
    [15]
    MAEDA K, HANAJIMA D, MORIOKA R, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emission from the cattle manure composting process by use of a bulking agent[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2013,59(1):96-106. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2012.733868
    [16]
    LIU J S, XIE Z B, LIU G, et al. A holistic evaluation of CO2 equivalent greenhouse gas emissions from compost reactors with aeration and calcium superphosphate addition[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2010, 25: 177-185.
    [17]
    van der WERF H M G, PETIT J, SANDERS J. The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne[J]. Agricultural Systems,2005,83(2):153-177. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.03.005
    [18]
    代小蓉. 集约化猪场NH3的排放系数研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2010.
    [19]
    夏湘勤, 席北斗, 黄彩红, 等.畜禽粪便堆肥臭气控制研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(6):649-657. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.05.142

    XIA X Q, XI B D, HUANG C H, et al. Review on odor control of livestock and poultry manure composting[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(6):649-657. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.05.142
    [20]
    张颖, 夏训峰, 李中和, 等.规模化养牛场粪便处理生命周期评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2010,29(7):1423-1427.

    ZHANG Y, XIA X F, LI Z H, et al. Life cycle assessment of manure treatment in scaled cattle farms[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2010,29(7):1423-1427.
    [21]
    张颖,夏训峰,周素霞, 等.规模化养猪场生命周期环境影响评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2012,2(5):428-432.

    ZHANG Y,XIA X F,ZHOU S X, et al. Life cycle assessment of large-scale piggery for environmental assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2012,2(5):428-432.
    [22]
    梁勤爽. 模拟畜禽粪便直接还田对氮磷的释放[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2009.
    [23]
    段雪琴. 集约化奶牛养殖场粪污管理系统的环境影响生命周期评价[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.
    [24]
    梁龙, 陈源泉, 高旺盛.我国农业生命周期评价框架探索及其应用: 以河北栾城冬小麦为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(5):154-160.

    LIANG L, CHEN Y Q, GAO W S. Framework study and application of agricultural life cycle assessment in China: a case study of winter wheat production in Luancheng of Hebei[J]. China Population Resources and Environment,2009,19(5):154-160.
    [25]
    CASTANHEIRA É G, DIAS A C, ARROJA L, et al. The environmental performance of milk production on a typical Portuguese dairy farm[J]. Agricultural Systems,2010,103(7):498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.05.004
    [26]
    HUIJBREGTS M A J, THISSEN U, GUINÉE J B, et al. Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA[J]. Chemosphere,2000,41(4):541-573. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00030-8
    [27]
    李云燕, 葛畅.环境费用效益分析: 理论、应用与展望[J]. 环境保护与循环经济,2016,36(9):29-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1021.2016.09.010

    LI Y Y, GE C. Analysis of environmental cost and benefit: theory, application and prospect[J]. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy,2016,36(9):29-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1021.2016.09.010
    [28]
    连海明. 规模化养猪场粪污处理的成本与效益分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2010.
    [29]
    MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ V, KROMANN M A, ASTRUP T F. Life cycle costing of waste management systems: overview, calculation principles and case studies[J]. Waste Management,2015,36:343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.033
    [30]
    YANG L L, XIAO X, GU K. Agricultural waste recycling optimization of family farms based on environmental management accounting in rural China[J]. Sustainability,2021,13(10):5515. doi: 10.3390/su13105515
    [31]
    李艳苓, 朱昌雄, 李红娜, 等.基于层次分析法的农业面源污染防治技术评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(4):355-361.

    LI Y L, ZHU C X, LI H N, et al. Evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution control technologies based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(4):355-361.
    [32]
    李梁, 曹欣然, 庞燕, 等.洱海流域农村生活污水治理技术评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(4):349-354.

    LI L, CAO X R, PANG Y, et al. Evaluation of rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(4):349-354.
    [33]
    韩旭, 生贺, 夏甫, 等.危险废物填埋场地下水污染风险评价中指标权重计算方法优化比选[J]. 环境科学研究,2021,34(6):1378-1386.

    HAN X, SHENG H, XIA F, et al. Optimized comparison and selection of index weight calculation methods in hazardous waste landfill site groundwater pollution risk assessment[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(6):1378-1386.
    [34]
    李艳萍, 乔琦, 柴发合, 等.基于层次分析法的工业园区环境风险评价指标权重分析[J]. 环境科学研究,2014,27(3):334-340.

    LI Y P, QIAO Q, CHAI F H, et al. Study on environmental risk assessment index weight of industrial park based on the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2014,27(3):334-340.
    [35]
    田羽, 方刚, 周长波, 等.我国橡胶制品行业VOCs末端减排技术评估[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(4):797-806.

    TIAN Y, FANG G, ZHOU C B, et al. Evaluation on VOCs terminal emission reduction technologies in rubber products industry in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(4):797-806.
    [36]
    王月, 王劢博, 杨悦, 等.西北生态脆弱区城市生活垃圾处理厂适用性评价[J]. 中国环境科学,2021,41(12):5933-5942. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2021.12.050

    WANG Y, WANG M B, YANG Y, et al. The optimization of municipal solid waste treatment technology in the ecological fragile areas of northwest China[J]. China Environmental Science,2021,41(12):5933-5942. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2021.12.050
    [37]
    PUBULE J, BLUMBERGA D. Impact assessment of biogas projects in Latvia[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning,2014,9(2):251-262. doi: 10.2495/SDP-V9-N2-251-262
    [38]
    问鑫.规模化猪场不同粪污处理的机理及经济分析[J]. 湖南饲料,2017(6):33-38.

    WEN X. Mechanism and economic analysis of different manure treatment in large-scale pig farms[J]. Hunan Feed,2017(6):33-38. ◇
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(13)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(227) PDF Downloads(42) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return