Volume 12 Issue 6
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU T,XU H.Application of difference-in-differences model in policy-based strategic environmental assessment: taking policy for agricultural support and protection subsidy as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1838-1844 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220537
Citation: LIU T,XU H.Application of difference-in-differences model in policy-based strategic environmental assessment: taking policy for agricultural support and protection subsidy as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1838-1844 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220537

Application of difference-in-differences model in policy-based strategic environmental assessment: taking policy for agricultural support and protection subsidy as an example

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220537
  • Received Date: 2022-05-30
    Available Online: 2022-09-22
  • Policy-based strategic environmental assessment (policy-based SEA) is an important part of the environmental impact assessment system. It is very important to carry out the method research of policy-based SEA for its system improvement and practice. Difference-in-differences (DID) is one of the main methods used to evaluate policy effects in econometrics. Taking the policy of agricultural support and protection subsidy as an example, multi-period DID was used to evaluate the impact of the policy on agricultural non-point source pollution, and explore the applicability of DID in policy-based SEA. This study found that DID had good applicability in policy-based SEA. In addition to the environmental impact assessment of post-implementation policies, DID could also be used for the retrospective evaluation of the relevant policies of pre-implementation policies. In the future, the research on technical methods of policy-based SEA should be strengthened, and a unified technical method system should be formed to promote the construction and improvement of policy-based SEA system. In addition, it was found that although the policy for agricultural support and protection subsidy was a favorable policy for environment, its positive impact on agricultural non-point source pollution was not significant, and even stimulated farmers to use more pesticides, resulting in a negative environmental impact.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    李海生, 李小敏, 赵玉婷, 等.基于文献计量分析的近40年国内外环境影响评价研究进展[J]. 环境科学研究,2022,35(5):1091-1101. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.02.16

    LI H S, LI X M, ZHAO Y T, et al. Environmental impact assessment research in domestic and foreign literature in past four decades based on scientometric reviews[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2022,35(5):1091-1101. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.02.16
    [2]
    朱源. 精准科学依法优化环境影响评价对象[N]. 中国环境报, 2020-07-17.
    [3]
    耿海清, 李天威, 徐鹤.我国开展政策环评的必要性及其基本框架研究[J]. 中国环境管理,2019,11(6):23-27.

    GENG H Q, LI T W, XU H. The necessity and basic framework of China's policy strategic environmental assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2019,11(6):23-27.
    [4]
    刘经纬. 我国政策环境影响评价制度的证成与展开[D]. 泉州: 华侨大学, 2019.
    [5]
    费希尔. 战略环境评价理论与实践: 迈向系统化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
    [6]
    潘硕, 刘婷, 徐鹤.CGE模型在政策环境影响评价中的应用[J]. 环境影响评价,2016,38(5):17-22.

    PAN S, LIU T, XU H. The application of CGE model in policy environmental impact assessment[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment,2016,38(5):17-22.
    [7]
    LENZEN M, MURRAY S A, KORTE B, et al. Environmental impact assessment including indirect effects: a case study using input-output analysis[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2003,23(3):263-282. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00104-X
    [8]
    邱怡慧, 苏时鹏.集体林权制度改革环境影响评价方法学分析[J]. 林业资源管理,2017(6):20-26.

    QIU Y H, SU S P. Methodological analysis of environmental impact assessment on the reform of collective forest tenure reform[J]. Forest Resources Management,2017(6):20-26.
    [9]
    ABAZA H, HAMWEY R. Integrated assessment as a tool for achieving sustainable trade policies[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2001,21(6):481-510. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00091-9
    [10]
    毛显强, 宋鹏.探路中国政策环境影响评价: 贸易政策领域先行实践[J]. 环境保护,2014,42(1):37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9705.2014.01.009
    [11]
    李天威. 政策环境评价理论方法与试点研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2017.
    [12]
    ANGRIST J D, PISCHKE J S. Mostly harmless econometrics[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2009.
    [13]
    ZHOU B, ZHANG C, SONG H Y, et al. How does emission trading reduce China's carbon intensity: an exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,676:514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.303
    [14]
    YI X Y, YU L R, CHANG S H E, et al. The effects of China's Organic-Substitute-Chemical-Fertilizer (OSCF) policy on greenhouse vegetable farmers[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,297:126677. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126677
    [15]
    DU M Z, LIAO L P, WANG B, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of the water-saving society construction in China: a quasi-natural experiment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2021,277:111394. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111394
    [16]
    MARDONES C, CORNEJO N. Ex-post evaluation of environmental decontamination plans on air quality in Chilean Cities[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2020,256:109929. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109929
    [17]
    谢培, 宫健, 陈诚.北京市农业面源污染负荷特征分析及控制分区[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(4):613-622. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190139

    XIE P, GONG J, CHEN C. Analysis of pollution load characteristics and control zones division of agricultural non-point sources in Beijing City[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(4):613-622. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190139
    [18]
    杨秀玉, 乔翠霞.农业补贴对生态环境的影响: 从化肥使用角度分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(7):47-53.

    YANG X Y, QIAO C X. Impacts of agricultural subsidies on ecological environment: from the perspective of fertilizer use[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,2018,39(7):47-53.
    [19]
    于伟咏, 漆雁斌, 余华.农资补贴对化肥面源污染效应的实证研究: 基于省级面板数据[J]. 农村经济,2017(2):89-94.
    [20]
    罗斯炫, 何可, 张俊飚.增产加剧污染: 基于粮食主产区政策的经验研究[J]. 中国农村经济,2020(1):108-131.

    LUO S X, HE K, ZHANG J B. The more grain production, the more fertilizers pollution: empirical evidence from major grain-producing areas in China[J]. Chinese Rural Economy,2020(1):108-131.
    [21]
    BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks: the winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The Journal of Finance,2010,65(5):1637-1667. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x
    [22]
    彭慧蓉. 中国粮食主产区农业补贴政策评价与研究: 基于农民视角的考察[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2019.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(727) PDF Downloads(39) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return