Volume 12 Issue 6
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GENG H Q,LI N K,LI M.Discussion on China's policy classification and main objects of policy strategic environmental assessment[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1825-1829 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220611
Citation: GENG H Q,LI N K,LI M.Discussion on China's policy classification and main objects of policy strategic environmental assessment[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):1825-1829 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220611

Discussion on China's policy classification and main objects of policy strategic environmental assessment

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220611
  • Received Date: 2022-06-12
    Available Online: 2022-09-14
  • In a broad sense, China's policies can be classified from the two aspects of level and form. Based on the policy classification, the objects of China's policy strategic environmental assessment (SEA) are mainly: 1) the economic policies which belong to the category of specific policy; 2) the policies formulated by the relevant departments of the State Council and the governments at or above the county level; 3) and the major policies that may result in significant environmental impacts. Considering the environmental impact assessment requirements of the existing laws and regulations in the formulation process of various policies, the normative documents in economic policies should be taken as the key objects of policy SEA, and the technical standards should be taken as the main type of technical policies and also be objects of policy SEA. In order to precisely identify the policy SEA objects, a normalized screening mechanism should be established.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    THERIVEL R, GONZÁLEZ A. "Ripe for decision": tiering in environmental assessment[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2021,87:106520. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106520
    [2]
    DUDLEY S E. Milestones in the evolution of the administrative state[J]. Daedalus,2021,150(3):33-48. doi: 10.1162/daed_a_01858
    [3]
    SILVIA F, TALIA V, di MATTEO M. Coal mining and policy responses: are externalities appropriately addressed: a meta-analysis[J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2021,126:39-47.
    [4]
    WILLIAMS T G, GUIKEMA S D, BROWN D G, et al. Assessing model equifinality for robust policy analysis in complex socio-environmental systems[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software,2020,134:104831.
    [5]
    AUNG T S, FISCHER T B, LUAN S J. Evaluating environmental impact assessment (EIA) in the countries along the belt and road initiatives: system effectiveness and the compatibility with the Chinese EIA[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2020,81:106361. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106361
    [6]
    VICTOR D, AGAMUTHU P. Policy trends of strategic environmental assessment in Asia[J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2014,41:63-76.
    [7]
    UNALAN D, COWELL R. Strategy, context and strategic environmental assessment[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2019,79:106305. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106305
    [8]
    LOGUE C, WERNER C, DOUGLAS M. Practitioners' perspectives on health in Strategic Environmental Assessment of spatial planning policies in Scotland[J]. Public Health,2022,202:49-51. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.011
    [9]
    KEITH B B. Improving regulatory impact analysis[J]. Regulation,2017,40(1):7-9.
    [10]
    The World Bank. Strategic environmental assessment in policy and sector reform[M]. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2010.
    [11]
    陈振明. 公共政策分析导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 12-24.
    [12]
    耿海清. 决策中的环境考量: 制度与实践[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2017: 49-55.
    [13]
    彭云望, 刘亚娜.基本国策与基本政策辨析[J]. 中国行政管理,2012(7):56-59.

    PENG Y W, LIU Y N. National tactic and natianal policy: conceptual difference[J]. Chinese Public Administration,2012(7):56-59.
    [14]
    王东杰, 郝茜, 易红宏, 等.稀土标准体系解析及环境影响探讨[J]. 稀土,2017,38(2):124-133. doi: 10.16533/J.CNKI.15-1099/TF.201702017

    WANG D J, HAO Q, YI H H, et al. Analysis and environmental effects of rare earth standards system[J]. Chinese Rare Earths,2017,38(2):124-133. doi: 10.16533/J.CNKI.15-1099/TF.201702017
    [15]
    王晓宁, 张宏智, 付亚君.高速公路环境影响评价指标及标准探讨[J]. 环境工程,2016,34(2):143-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201602031

    WANG X N, ZHANG H Z, FU Y J. Discussion on freeway environmental impact assessment index and standard[J]. Environmental Engineering,2016,34(2):143-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201602031
    [16]
    ALDY J E, ATKINSON G, KOTCHEN M J. Environmental benefit-cost analysis: a comparative analysis between the United States and the United Kingdom[J]. Annual Review of Resource Economics,2021,13:267-288. ⊕ doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-040821-045913
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(413) PDF Downloads(31) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return