| Citation: | ZHANG D C,WANG Z M,LI Y J,et al.Research on the index system and evaluation method for ecological services of river shorelines[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology，2024，14（1）：289-297 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230352
|
River shorelines are important components of the natural ecological space of rivers. In recent years, human activities have affected the ecological service function of river shorelines. In order to accurately carry out the restoration, it is urgent to develop a targeted evaluation index system and evaluation methods for the ecological service function of river shorelines. The type and structure of riverfronts were analyzed. Based on the relevant domestic research results and relevant technical specifications of water conservancy, environmental protection, marine and other industries, the ecological function evaluation indicators of riverfronts were preliminarily sorted out and comprehensively selected according to the principles of scientificity, comprehensiveness, independence and operability. Based on relevant technical specifications and research results, the utility values of each evaluation index were determined, and the evaluation method of riverfront ecological service function was developed. The results indicated that: 1) River shoreline could be divided into ecological protection type and ecological restoration type, the former could be subdivided into good vegetation type, desert type and rock type, and the latter could be subdivided into 7 types, including dike type, farmland type, village type, aquaculture pond type, town type, river mouth type and compound type. The riverfront had five ecological service functions: flood control, erosion control, water quality protection, biological habitat and landscape functions. 2) The constructed evaluation index system of river shoreline ecological service function included target layer, criterion layer and index layer. The target layer was the river shoreline ecological service function, and the criterion layer was the five ecological service functions corresponding to river shorelines. The index layer included flood control compliance rate, dike safety, vegetation coverage, bank slope stability, reasonable degree of sewage outfall layout, ecological buffer zone status, biological diversity index, plant community status, water bird status, landscape ecological value, and landscape comfort. The utility values of each indicator were defined as five grades based on the overall evaluation. 3) AHP was used to determine the weight of each evaluation index, and multi-attribute utility theory was used to calculate the comprehensive index of riverfront ecological service function, and the riverfront ecological service function was divided into five grades, i.e. excellent, good, medium, poor and extremely poor, so as to evaluate the status of riverfront ecological service function. This study could provide basis and reference for identifying ecological issues, evaluating the effectiveness of ecological restoration, and improving long-term mechanisms for river shoreline management.
| [1] |
唐晓岚, 周铭杰, 杨阳, 等. 长江南京河段岸线景观资源保护对策探讨[J]. 人民长江,2021,52(11):28-33.
TANG X L, ZHOU M J, YANG Y, et al. Discussion on countermeasures for landscape resources protection along Nanjing section of Yangtze River[J]. Yangtze River,2021,52(11):28-33.
|
| [2] |
廖迎娣, 张欢, 侯利军, 等. 江苏长江岸线生态修复评价指标体系研究[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(10):3910-3916.
LIAO Y D, ZHANG H, HOU L J, et al. Discussion on evaluation indicator system of ecological remediation along the shoreline of Yangtze River in Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(10):3910-3916.
|
| [3] |
段学军, 邹辉, 王晓龙, 等. 大河岸线生态完整性内涵及评估方法研究: 以长江岸线为例[J/Ol]. 生态学报, 2023. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20230321.1708.016.html.
DUAN X J, ZHOU H, WANG X L, et al. Implication and assessment of the ecological integrity of riverfront along great rivers: taking the Yangtze River as an example[J/OL]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20230321.1708.016.html.
|
| [4] |
郭二辉, 杨喜田, 陈利顶. 河岸带生态功能认知及河流景观偏好的调查研究[J]. 中国园林,2017,33(1):95-99.
GUO E H, YANG X T, CHEN L D. Research of resident's perceptions to ecological functions of riparian buffers and their preferences for river landscape[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture,2017,33(1):95-99.
|
| [5] |
WEI L, ZHOU L, SUN D Q, et al. Evaluating the impact of urban expansion on the habitat quality and constructing ecological security patterns: a case study of Jiziwan in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2022,145:109544. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109544
|
| [6] |
CHEN D, HOU L J, LIAO Y D. Strengthening efficient usage, protection, and restoration of Yangtze River shoreline[J]. Water Science and Engineering,2021,14(4):257-259. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2021.10.001
|
| [7] |
杨成刚, 杨振, 王伟. 基于空间形态的河道岸线利用模式分类及应用[J]. 人民长江,2020,51(11):10-15.
YANG C G, YANG Z, WANG W. Classification and application of utilization mode of rivers shoreline based on spatial morphology[J]. Yangtze River,2020,51(11):10-15.
|
| [8] |
杨芳, 徐建锋, 廖嘉玲, 等. 四川省河流岸线开发利用与保护区划研究: 以沱江流域为例[J]. 人民长江,2020,51(8):8-12.
YANG F, XU J F, LIAO J L, et al. Exploitation and zoning of river shoreline functional area in Sichuan Province: case of Tuojiang River Basin[J]. Yangtze River,2020,51(8):8-12.
|
| [9] |
徐宜雪, 魏伟伟, 李春华, 等. 长潭水库湖滨带、缓冲带范围划定及生态修复实践[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(6):2105-2112. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210511
XU Y X, WEI W W, LI C H, et al. Delimitation and ecological restoration practice of lake littoral zone and lake buffer zone of Changtan Reservoir[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):2105-2112. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210511
|
| [10] |
陈达, 钟菁, 吴腾, 等. 江苏省长江岸线利用率影响因素分析[J]. 水资源保护,2022,38(3):17-24.
CHEN D, ZHONG J, WU T, et al. Factors influencing utilization rate of Yangtze River shoreline in Jiangsu Province[J]. Water Resources Protection,2022,38(3):17-24.
|
| [11] |
王洪铸, 宋春雷, 刘学勤, 等. 巢湖湖滨带概况及环湖岸线和水向湖滨带生态修复方案[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(增刊2):62-68.
WANG H Z, SONG C L, LIU X Q, et al. Lakeshore overview of Lake Chaohu and ecological rehabilitation schemes for shoreline and littoral zones[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2012,21(Suppl 2):62-68.
|
| [12] |
李志华, 孙兆地, 马鑫, 等. 徐州市奎河硬质护岸生态化改造方案研究[J]. 人民长江,2020,51(增刊1):61-65.
LI Z H, SUN Z D, MA X, et al. Study on ecological reconstruction scheme of Kuihe hard bank protection in Xuzhou City[J]. Yangtze River,2020,51(Suppl 1):61-65.
|
| [13] |
孙晨, 陈金杭, 苏晨, 等. 湖泊水陆交错带生境改善措施研究与探讨[C]//中国环境科学学会2021年科学技术年会论文集(二). 北京: 中国环境科学学会, 2021: 307-311.
|
| [14] |
刘瑞霞, 孙菲, 肖满, 等. 浙江嘉善东部区域盛家湾河道缓冲带及水生态修复实践[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(6):2095-2104.
LIU R X, SUN F, XIAO M, et al. Riverine buffer zone and water ecological restoration practice of Shengjiawan River course in eastern Jiashan County of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(6):2095-2104.
|
| [15] |
许盛凯, 朱韻洁, 袁哲, 等. 长江干流岸线缓冲带生态构建方案研究: 以长江江阴段为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(2):581-589.
XU S K, ZHU Y J, YUAN Z, et al. Research on ecological construction scheme of the shoreline buffer zone of the mainstream of the Yangtze River: take the Jiangyin Section of the Yangtze River as an example[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(2):581-589.
|
| [16] |
廖迎娣, 张欢, 张诗敏, 等. 江苏长江岸线生态修复评价指标体系的应用[J]. 水运工程,2022(8):141-147.
LIAO Y D, ZHANG H, ZHANG S M, et al. Application of the evaluation index system for ecological remediation of the Yangtze River shoreline in Jiangsu Province[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering,2022(8):141-147.
|
| [17] |
QIAN L Y, WANG F F, CAO W, et al. Ecological health assessment and sustainability prediction in coastal area: a case study in Xiamen Bay, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2023,148:110047. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110047
|
| [18] |
水利部河湖管理司. 河湖健康评价指南(试行)[S/OL]. [2023-02-20]. http://www.hzyzk.cn/news/newsshow-1593025.html.
|
| [19] |
生态环境部. 河湖生态缓冲带保护修复技术指南[S/OL]. [2023-02-20]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/202112/W020211215541263714758.pdf.
|
| [20] |
浙江省市场监督管理局. 海岸线整治修复评估技术规程: DB33/T 2368—2021[S/OL]. [2023-02-20]. https://zjjcmspublic.oss-cn-hangzhou-zwynet-d01-a.internet.cloud.zj.gov.cn/jcms_files/jcms1/web3397/site/attach/-1/2109281613345386687.pdf.
|
| [21] |
段丽军. 河岸带生态功能研究综述[J]. 华北国土资源,2015(2):95-96.
DUAN L J. Review on ecological function of riparian zone[J]. Huabei Natural Resources,2015(2):95-96.
|
| [22] |
韩路, 王海珍, 于军. 河岸带生态学研究进展与展望[J]. 生态环境学报,2013,22(5):879-886.
HAN L, WANG H Z, YU J. Research progress and prospects on riparian zone ecology[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences,2013,22(5):879-886.
|
| [23] |
夏继红, 周子晔, 汪颖俊, 等. 河长制中的河流岸线规划与管理[J]. 水资源保护,2017,33(5):38-41.
XIA J H, ZHOU Z Y, WANG Y J, et al. Planning and management for riparian lines in river chief system[J]. Water Resources Protection,2017,33(5):38-41.
|
| [24] |
叶春, 李春华, 邓婷婷. 论湖滨带的结构与生态功能[J]. 环境科学研究,2015,28(2):171-181.
YE C, LI C H, DENG T T. Structures and ecological functions of lake littoral zones[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2015,28(2):171-181.
|
| [25] |
廖先容, 扈幸伟, 邬龙. 城市河流滨岸缓冲带生态修复模式研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2017,48(10):109-112.
LIAO X R, HU X W, WU L. Study on eco-restoration mode for riparian buffer zone of urban river[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2017,48(10):109-112.
|
| [26] |
REN L, SONG S P, ZHOU Y. Evaluation of river ecological status in the plain river network area in the context of urbanization: a case study of 21 rivers' ecological status in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2022,142:109172. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109172
|
| [27] |
袁鹏, 刘瑞霞, 俞洁, 等. 《浙江省河流生态缓冲带划定与生态修复技术指南(试行)》解读[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(1):1-5.
YUAN P, LIU R X, YU J, et al. Interpretation of Technical Guidelines for Delineation and Ecological Restoration of Riparian Buffers of Rivers in Zhejiang Province (Trial)[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(1):1-5.
|
| [28] |
CHEN J W, YANG T, WANG Y, et al. Effects of ecological restoration on water quality and benthic macroinvertebrates in rural rivers of cold regions: a case study of the Huaide River, Northeast China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2022,142:109169. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109169
|
| [29] |
杨青瑞, 陈声威, 何建宽, 等. 支流生境替代保护效果评价指标体系与评价方法研究[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2015,13(6):408-413.
YANG Q R, CHEN S W, HE J K, et al. Evaluation index system of tributary habitat alternative protective effect[J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,2015,13(6):408-413.
|
| [30] |
ZHANG N N, GAO J W, XU S D, et al. Establishing an evaluation index system of Coastal Port shoreline resources utilization by objective indicators[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management,2022,217:106003.
|
| [31] |
修淳, 霍素霞, 王国钢, 等. 一种定量化的山东省自然岸线质量评价方法[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2022,38(7):86-88.
XIU C, HUO S X, WANG G G, et al. A quantitative evaluation method of natural coastline quality in Shandong Province[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers,2022,38(7):86-88. ◇
|
Figures(2) / Tables(2)
Copyright © Editorial Department of Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
DownLoad:
