Volume 13 Issue 6
Nov.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI X P,WANG X H,WU P,et al.Research on the verifying method of allowable discharge in printing and dyeing industry based on different discharge reduction scenarios: a case study in Nantong City of Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(6):2289-2298 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230421
Citation: LI X P,WANG X H,WU P,et al.Research on the verifying method of allowable discharge in printing and dyeing industry based on different discharge reduction scenarios: a case study in Nantong City of Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(6):2289-2298 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230421

Research on the verifying method of allowable discharge in printing and dyeing industry based on different discharge reduction scenarios: a case study in Nantong City of Jiangsu Province

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230421
  • Received Date: 2023-05-31
  • In view of the need for reasonable determination of allowable emission limits in China's emission permit system, 88 printing and dyeing enterprises in Nantong City were taken as the research object, and the traditional discharge performance accounting methods and baseline setting methods were adopted to determine the discharge performance of printing and dyeing enterprises based on the actual emission level. Meanwhile, the allowable limits of printing and dyeing enterprises were determined under three scenarios of strong, medium and weak discharge reduction from a hypothetical quantitative perspective. The discharge reductions of chemical oxygen demand (CODCr), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) under the three scenarios were projected. The results showed as follows: 1) The maximum average value of the actual discharges of CODCr, NH3-N,TN and TP in 88 printing and dyeing enterprises did not exceed 34.46% of the allowable discharges, the permissible discharge of major water pollutants in Nantong printing and dyeing enterprises had great potential for verification and reduction. 2) 95% and 99% quantile values of the 4 pollutants from 88 printing and dyeing enterprises obtained by the quantile value method were equivalent to the corresponding performance values of P95 and P99 obtained by the normal distribution analysis method. 3) Comparing the numerical reference lines obtained by the quantile value method and the normal distribution analysis method with the actual average and standard performances of 88 printing and dyeing enterprises, it was found that as to the four pollutants, at least 71.59% of the enterprises were below the average performances, 17.05% of the enterprises were between the average performances and the 95% quintile, and 2.33% of the enterprises were between the 95% quintile and the standard performances. 4) Based on the three discharge reduction scenarios of weak, medium, and strong, the projected discharge reductions for four pollutants were 2.08%-5.99%, 11.73%-20.05% and 23.24%-36.04%, respectively.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    宋国君, 张震. 美国工业点源水污染物排放标准体系及启示[J]. 环境污染与防治,2014,36(1):97-101.

    SONG G J, ZHANG Z. Effluent standards system for industrial point sources in USA and its implimentation to China[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control,2014,36(1):97-101.
    [2]
    TABLER S K. EPA's program for establishing national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants[J]. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association,1984,34(5):532-536. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1984.10465771
    [3]
    PAHL D. EPA's program for establishing standards of performance for new stationary sources of air pollution[J]. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association,1983,33(5):468-482. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1983.10465594
    [4]
    叶维丽, 周海洋, 张金辉, 等. 基于水质目标的排污许可限值管理体系思考与建议[J]. 环境保护,2021,49(9):23-25.

    YE W L, ZHOU H Y, ZHANG J H, et al. Thoughts and suggestions on the management system of pollutant discharge permit limit based on water quality objectives[J]. Environmental Protection,2021,49(9):23-25.
    [5]
    王焕松, 周添, 贾学桦, 等. 衔接水质目标与管控现状的水污染物许可排放量核算方法研究: 以造纸和纸制品业为例[J]. 环境保护,2022,50(13):28-34.

    WANG H S, ZHOU T, JIA X H, et al. Study on accounting method of allowable discharge of water pollutants linking water quality objectives with control status: taking paper and paper products industry as an example[J]. Environmental Protection,2022,50(13):28-34.
    [6]
    胡颖, 邓义祥, 郝晨林, 等. 我国应逐步实施基于水质的排污许可管理[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(11):2507-2514.

    HU Y, DENG Y X, HAO C L, et al. Gradual implementation of pollutant discharge permit management based on water quality targets in China[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(11):2507-2514.
    [7]
    长江经济带生态环境保护规划[N]. 中国能源报, 2017-07-24(19).
    [8]
    田涛, 高海龙, 张冰洁. 基于先进技术的印染行业企业许可排放量核定方法研究: 以太湖流域为例[J]. 环境工程,2022,40(10):176-182.

    TIAN T, GAO H L, ZHANG B J. Verification method of the permitted emissions of printing and dyeing enterprises based on advanced technologies: a case study of the Taihu Lake basin[J]. Environmental Engineering,2022,40(10):176-182.
    [9]
    邓义祥, 郝晨林, 李子成, 等. 基于技术和水质相结合的排污许可限值核定技术研究[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(11):2515-2522.

    DENG Y X, HAO C L, LI Z C, et al. Revision and determination of wastewater discharge permit limit based on technology and water quality target[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(11):2515-2522.
    [10]
    张月, 蔡木林, 邢敏, 等. 控制单元污染源排污许可总量限值优化研究: 以永定河流域为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2023,13(1):431-437.

    ZHANG Y, CAI M L, XING M, et al. Optimization of total discharge permit limit of pollution sources in control units: a case study of Yongding River watershed[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(1):431-437.
    [11]
    QU Y, YUAN Y M, GUO L L, et al. Initial allocation of SO2 emission rights based on the combination weighting method: evidence from China's thermal power plants[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2022,29(10):14743-14753. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15745-x
    [12]
    QIN T L, YAN D H, YU Z L, et al. Research on the overall framework of total quantity control of water pollutants in the strategic environmental assessment of basin[M]//Advances in Energy Equipment Science and Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015: 717-723.
    [13]
    ZHOU Z B, LIU C J, ZENG X M, et al. Carbon emission performance evaluation and allocation in Chinese cities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,172:1254-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.208
    [14]
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Water Pollution Control Act[A/OL]. (2002-11-27)[2023-05-10]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-08/documents/federal-water-pollution-control-act-508full.
    [15]
    金之杰. 碳排放权交易下企业碳履约成本分析:基于多案例的比较[D]. 杭州: 杭州电子科技大学, 2023.
    [16]
    李嘉. 基于行业排污特性的排污许可限值核定方法研究: 以沙颍河典型行业为例[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2020.
    [17]
    刘添涛, 张怀东. 印染行业“十三五”清洁生产潜力分析研究[J]. 染整技术,2016,38(8):59-62.

    LIU T T, ZHANG H D. Analysis and research on cleaner production potential of printing and dyeing industry in the 13th Five-Year Plan[J]. Textile Dyeing and Finishing Journal,2016,38(8):59-62. ◇
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(186) PDF Downloads(36) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return