| Citation: | LI X W,DENG C N,HUANG X Y,et al.Exploring the application of flagship species in biodiversity valuation[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology，2024，14（3）：1077-1086 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20230846
|
The value of the biodiversity perceived by the stakeholders will influence their behavior and attitude towards environment protection and thus impact the efficiency and effectiveness of policies related to environmental conservation directly. To characterize the value perception of biodiversity by stakeholders in a specific region more accurately, a method of choice experiment designed from the perspective of flagship species was proposed. The steps of the method included: selecting flagship species for attribute design based on the study area, optimizing and generating the choice experiment questionnaire for the formal survey based on the results of the pre-survey, obtaining the willingness to pay through the questionnaire survey, evaluating the value of biodiversity in a specific region. Applying the methodology in Qinling Mountains (Shaanxi section), giant pandas, golden monkeys, and crested ibis were selected as flagship species, and 1 288 individuals were finally included through field visits and online surveys. The results showed that the marginal monetary willingness to pay of respondents from inside and outside Shaanxi Province for Qinling biodiversity protection was 146.29 and 212.60 yuan per year, and the value of marginal time willingness to pay was 240.12 and 350.01 yuan per year, respectively. According to the marginal willingness to pay, the biodiversity value of Qinling Mountains (Shaanxi section) was estimated to be 489.772-979.545 billion yuan per year. The case study proves that this method can reflect the value of biodiversity in a more comprehensive and comprehensible way, and provide a solid data basis for the formulation and implementation of ecosystem protection policies.
| [1] |
马克平. 试论生物多样性的概念[J]. 生物多样性,1993(1):20-22.
|
| [2] |
ASSESSMENT M E. Ecosystems and human well-being[M].Washington DC: Island Press, 2005.
|
| [3] |
HANLEY N, PERRINGS C. The economic value of biodiversity[J]. Annual Review of Resource Economics,2019,11:355-375.
|
| [4] |
王小莉, 高振斌, 苏婧, 等. 区域生态系统服务价值评估方法比较与案例分析[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2018,8(2):212-220.
WANG X L, GAO Z B, SU J, et al. Assessment methods of regional ecosystem service value and a case study of Dongjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2018,8(2):212-220.
|
| [5] |
陈朝, 杨贤房, 陈进栋, 等. 考虑地形与生物多样性的InVEST模型及其在县域生物多样性安全格局分析中的应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2023,13(4):1345-1353.
CHEN C, YANG X F, CHEN J D, et al. InVEST Model considering terrain and biodiversity and its application in the analysis of county biodiversity security pattern: a case study of Wengyuan County[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(4):1345-1353.
|
| [6] |
McINTYRE P B, JONES L E, FLECKER A S, et al. Fish extinctions alter nutrient recycling in tropical freshwaters[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2007,104(11):4461-4466.
|
| [7] |
王寿兵, 胥思涵, 李果, 等. 基于《野生动物及其制品价值评估方法》的湿地鸟类经济价值评估: 以江苏三片典型潮间带湿地鸟类为例[J/OL]. 复旦学报(自然科学版), 2023. DOI: 10.15943/j.cnki.fdxb-jns.20231024.001.
|
| [8] |
郭培培, 於方, 周夏飞, 等. 基于案例分析的湿地生物多样性损害评估研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2023,48(11):177-182.
GUO P P, YU F, ZHOU X F, et al. Assessment of wetland biodiversity damage based on case study[J]. Environmental Science and Management,2023,48(11):177-182.
|
| [9] |
CZAJKOWSKI M, GIERGICZNY M, KRONENBERG J, et al. The economic recreational value of a white stork nesting colony: a case of ‘stork village’ in Poland[J]. Tourism Management,2014,40:352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.07.009
|
| [10] |
RUSSELL S, ENS E. Connection as country: relational values of billabongs in Indigenous northern Australia[J]. Ecosystem Services,2020,45:101169. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101169
|
| [11] |
LABAND D N. The neglected stepchildren of forest-based ecosystem services: cultural, spiritual, and aesthetic values[J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2013,35:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.006
|
| [12] |
WATSON R, BASTE I, LARIGAUDERIE A, et al. ummary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services[J]. Bonn, Germany: IPBES Secretariat, 2019: 22-47.
|
| [13] |
吴杨, 田瑜, 戴逢斌, 等. “自然对人类的贡献”的实现、发展趋势和启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21549.
WU Y, TIAN Y, DAI F B, et al. Realization, development trend and enlightenment of Nature's Contributions to People[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2022, 30(5): 21549.
|
| [14] |
张殷波, 牛杨杨, 王文智, 等. 基于选择试验法的受威胁物种保护偏好及价值评估[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(10):2342-2350.
ZHANG Y B, NIU Y Y, WANG W Z, et al. Conservation preference and value evaluation of endangered species based on choice experiment methods[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(10):2342-2350.
|
| [15] |
秦彦强, 余亚亮, 刘瑞涵. 生态价值评估的选择实验法: 原理与国内应用[J]. 中国农学通报,2021,37(17):80-86.
QIN Y Q, YU Y L, LIU R H. Choice experiment method and ecological value evaluation: principle and domestic application[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2021,37(17):80-86.
|
| [16] |
朱战国, 董鑫, 张彤. 农产品生态系统价值的标签化策略: 基于选择实验法的实证分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(1):160-171.
ZHU Z G, DONG X, ZHANG T. Labeling strategy of ecosystem value of agricultural products: an empirical analysis based on choice experiment[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition),2022,22(1):160-171.
|
| [17] |
吴晓珍. 基于选择实验法的流域生态系统服务价值评估研究: 以岷江流域为例[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2021.
|
| [18] |
亢楠楠. 国家森林公园游憩价值评价研究: 基于游客满意度的视角[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2019.
|
| [19] |
MÄNTYMAA E, ARTELL J, FORSMAN J T, et al. Is it more important to increase carbon sequestration, biodiversity, or jobs: a case study of citizens' preferences for forest policy in Finland[J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2023,154:103023. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103023
|
| [20] |
SHOYAMA K, MANAGI S, YAMAGATA Y. Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: a choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators[J]. Land Use Policy,2013,34:282-293. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003
|
| [21] |
SAARIKOSKI H, AAPALA K, ARTELL J, et al. Multimethod valuation of peatland ecosystem services: combining choice experiment, multicriteria decision analysis and deliberative valuation[J]. Ecosystem Services,2022,57:101471. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101471
|
| [22] |
HEYWOOD V H, WATSON R T. Global biodiversity assessment[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
|
| [23] |
JOHNSINGH A J T, JOSHUA J. Conserving Rajaji and Corbett National Parks: the elephant as a flagship species[J]. Oryx,1994,28(2):135-140. doi: 10.1017/S0030605300028453
|
| [24] |
徐卫华, 欧阳志云, 张路, 等. 长江流域重要保护物种分布格局与优先区评价[J]. 环境科学研究,2010,23(3):312-319.
XU W H, OUYANG Z Y, ZHANG L, et al. Spatial distribution and priority areas analysis for key protection species in Yangtze Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2010,23(3):312-319.
|
| [25] |
MARTÍNEZ-JAUREGUI M, WHITE P C L, TOUZA J, et al. Untangling perceptions around indicators for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services,2019,38:100952. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100952
|
| [26] |
MARTÍNEZ-JAUREGUI M, DELIBES-MATEOS M, ARROYO B, et al. Beyond rural vs urban differences: a close match in European preferences in some basic wildlife management and conservation principles[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2023,331:117236. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117236
|
| [27] |
SENZAKI M, YAMAURA Y, SHOJI Y, et al. Citizens promote the conservation of flagship species more than ecosystem services in wetland restoration[J]. Biological Conservation,2017,214:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.025
|
| [28] |
JACOBSEN J B, BOIESEN J H, THORSEN B J, et al. What’s in a Name?The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2008,39(3):247-263. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9107-6
|
| [29] |
CHRISTIE M, FAZEY I, COOPER R, et al. An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies[J]. Ecological Economics,2012,83:67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012
|
| [30] |
KUHFELD W F. Marketing research methods in SAS: experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques [M]. Cary, NC : SAS Institute Inc,2010: 53-241.
|
| [31] |
黄安琪. 游客视角下的新安江流域游憩服务价值识别研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021.
|
| [32] |
陈鸣. 农户宅基地退出补偿偏好与异质性来源: 基于选择实验法的分析[J]. 资源科学,2021,43(7):1467-1478.
CHEN M. Compensation preference and heterogeneity sources of homestead withdrawal of farming households: based on choice experiment method[J]. Resources Science,2021,43(7):1467-1478.
|
| [33] |
WALKER J. Mixed logit (or logit kernel) model: dispelling misconceptions of identification[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2002,1805(1):86-98. doi: 10.3141/1805-11
|
| [34] |
史恒通, 睢党臣, 吴海霞, 等. 公众对黑河流域生态系统服务消费偏好及支付意愿研究: 基于选择实验法的实证分析[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(2):342-350.
SHI H T, SUI D C, WU H X, et al. Public preference and willingness to pay for the Heihe River watershed ecosystem service: an empirical study on choice experiments[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2019,39(2):342-350.
|
| [35] |
王树盛, 黄卫, 陆振波. Mixed Logit模型及其在交通方式分担中的应用研究[J]. 公路交通科技,2006(5):92-95.
|
| [36] |
RUNGIE C M, COOTE L V, LOUVIERE J J. Structural choice modelling: theory and applications to combining choice experiments[J]. Journal of Choice Modelling,2011,4(3):1-29. doi: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70040-X
|
| [37] |
McGINLAY J, PARSONS D J, MORRIS J, et al. Leisure activities and social factors influence the generation of cultural ecosystem service benefits[J]. Ecosystem Services,2018,31:468-480. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.019
|
| [38] |
SATO M, USHIMARU A, MINAMOTO T. Effect of different personal histories on valuation for forest ecosystem services in urban areas: a case study of Mt. Rokko, Kobe, Japan[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2017,28:110-117.
|
| [39] |
YANG J, SU K W, ZHOU Z Y, et al. The impact of tourist cognition on willing to pay for rare species conservation: base on the questionnaire survey in protected areas of the Qinling region in China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation,2022,33:e01952. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01952
|
| [40] |
HOU Y L, LIU T L, ZHAO Z, et al. Estimating the cultural value of wild animals in the Qinling Mountains, China: a choice experiment[J]. Animals:an Open Access Journal from MDPI,2020,10(12):2422. ⊗
|
Figures(6) / Tables(4)
Copyright © Editorial Department of Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
DownLoad:
