SONG X M,ZHANG Q C,HAN Z T,et al.Study on ammonia-N, nitrate-N and nitrite-N remedial target values of groundwater of a coastal contaminated site considering marine environmental risks[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(6):1788-1797. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20240065
Citation: SONG X M,ZHANG Q C,HAN Z T,et al.Study on ammonia-N, nitrate-N and nitrite-N remedial target values of groundwater of a coastal contaminated site considering marine environmental risks[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(6):1788-1797. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20240065

Study on ammonia-N, nitrate-N and nitrite-N remedial target values of groundwater of a coastal contaminated site considering marine environmental risks

More Information
  • Received Date: January 27, 2024
  • Revised Date: June 19, 2024
  • Accepted Date: June 19, 2024
  • Contaminated groundwater from seaside contaminated sites may cause sea contamination. This study investigated the remedial target values of a compound fertilizer production enterprise adjacent to the sea. Three methods to determine the remedial target values of groundwater "three nitrogen" (ammonia-N, nitrate-N and nitrite-N pollution) were tested, including groundwater environmental quality standards, risk assessment based on human health, and hydrogeological risk assessment model used to protect the water environment. The scientificity and rationality of the remediation target values were analyzed and discussed. The enterprise was located in the coastal industrial park of a city in the north of China, and the boundary of the enterprise was about 108 m away from the coast. There was no exploitation and utilization of groundwater in this site, and the ammonia nitrogen remedial target value obtained from the human health risk assessment calculations was as high as 57 200 mg/L due to the absence of a human exposure pathway. Even if the groundwater Class Ⅳ water standard was taken as the remedial target, i.e., the remedial target values of ammonia nitrogen,nitrate nitrogen and nitrite nitrogen (all in N) were 1.50, 30.00 and 4.80 mg/L, respectively, the concentrations were much higher than the seawater water quality standard (total inorganic nitrogen was less than 0.50 mg/L), and there may be a risk of contamination of seawater. Therefore, using the hydrogeological risk assessment model to protect the water environment in the United Kingdom, the remedial target value of total inorganic nitrogen in the groundwater at the site was calculated to be 42 mg/L. A comparison of the three sets of remedial target values showed that the remedial target value based on the groundwater quality standard was too stringent. Although it prevented environmental risks, it was difficult to achieve through remediation simulation prediction. The remedial target value based on the protection of human health was too loose. If this target value was adopted, the total inorganic nitrogen concentration of the groundwater from the site when flowing into the ocean was predicted to be 31.91 mg/L, which would cause serious pollution to the marine environment. In contrast, the remedial target value based on protecting the marine environment not only avoided the risk of ocean pollution but also was more achievable.

  • [1]
    臧常娟, 孙玉超, 刘志阳, 等. 原位水平阻隔风险管控技术在某退役工业污染场地治理中的应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2023,13(4):1497-1505. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220677

    ZANG C J, SUN Y C, LIU Z Y, et al. Application of in-situ horizontal barrier risk control technology in the treatment of a decommissioned industrial contaminated site[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(4):1497-1505. DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220677
    [2]
    侯德义. 我国工业场地地下水污染防治十大科技难题[J]. 环境科学研究,2022,35(9):2015-2025.

    HOU D Y. Ten grand challenges for groundwater pollution prevention and remediation at contaminated sites in China[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2022,35(9):2015-2025.
    [3]
    马杰. 我国挥发性有机污染地块调查评估中存在的问题及对策建议[J]. 环境工程学报,2021,15(1):3-7. DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.202007080

    MA J. Problems and suggestion for investigation and risk assessment of sites impacted by volatile organic compounds in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2021,15(1):3-7. DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.202007080
    [4]
    生态环境部. 污染地块地下水修复和风险管控技术导则: HJ 25.6—2019[S]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2019.
    [5]
    熊杰, 周友亚, 张超艳, 等. 场地土壤修复目标值制定方法与政策[J]. 环境工程学报,2023,17(1):197-206. DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.202206143

    XIONG J, ZHOU Y Y, ZHANG C Y, et al. A study on methodology and policies for developing soil remediation target value of contaminated sites[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2023,17(1):197-206. DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.202206143
    [6]
    BARRON M G, WHARTON S R. Survey of methodologies for developing media screening values for ecological risk assessment[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management,2005,1(4):320-332. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.5630010402
    [7]
    UK environment agency. Remedial targets methodology: hydrogeological risk assessment for land contamination-mainreport[EB/OL]. (2014-08-04)[2023-10-24]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e2570e5274a2e8ab46226/geho0706bleq-e-e.pdf.
    [8]
    Government of Alberta. Alberta Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines[EB/OL]. (2022-08-29). https://open.alberta.ca/publications/1926-6243.
    [9]
    陈梦舫, 韩璐, 罗飞. 污染场地土壤与地下水精细化风险评估理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022.
    [10]
    ZHANG Y Q , LI Y X, LIU C W. Application research of quantitative risk assessment technology for oil station integrity management[C]//第四届CCPS中国过程安全会议论文集. 中国石油大学(华东), 中国化学品安全协会, 美国化学工程师协会化工过程安全中心, 2016.
    [11]
    武文培, 陈梦舫, 韩璐, 等. 基于统计方法学的焦化类污染场地风险筛选决策研究[J]. 环境科学研究,2022,35(12):2819-2829.

    WU W P, CHEN M F, HAN L, et al. Risk screening decision of coking pollution sites based on statistical methods[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2022,35(12):2819-2829.
    [12]
    陈梦舫, 韩璐, 罗飞. 污染场地土壤与地下水风险评估方法学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
    [13]
    谢雨呈, 谭长银, 张朝, 等. 典型肥料生产场地氨氮分布特征及风险控制目标确定[J]. 环境科学研究,2019,32(3):465-474.

    XIE Y C, TAN C Y, ZHANG C, et al. Characteristics of ammonia-nitrogen distribution and determination of risk control targets at an abandoned fertilizer production site[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2019,32(3):465-474.
    [14]
    陈云, 姜登登, 阳昆桦, 等. 氮肥企业退役地块氨氮污染及其风险研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2022,42(7):3265-3275. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2022.07.030

    CHEN Y, JIANG D D, YANG K H, et al. Pollution characteristics and environmental risks of ammonia nitrogen in retired nitrogen fertilizer plant sites[J]. China Environmental Science,2022,42(7):3265-3275. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2022.07.030
    [15]
    刘朋超, 武文培, 冉睿予, 等. 基于保护水环境的场地地下水风险评估模拟应用研究[J]. 土壤,2022,54(1):136-144.

    LIU P C, WU W P, RAN R Y, et al. Modelling application for contaminated land groundwater risk assessment based on prospection of water environment[J]. Soils,2022,54(1):136-144.
    [16]
    李绪谦, 朱雅宁, 于光, 等. 氨氮在弱透水层中的渗透迁移规律研究[J]. 水文,2011,31(3):71-75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0852.2011.03.014

    LI X Q, ZHU Y N, YU G, et al. Study on permeation and migration law of ammonia nitrogen in aquitard[J]. Journal of China Hydrology,2011,31(3):71-75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0852.2011.03.014
    [17]
    向韬, 马延庚. 硝酸盐污染物在不同介质下的最大吸附量研究[J]. 广州化工,2016,44(8):113-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2016.08.041

    XIANG T, MA Y G. Study on the maximum adsorption of nitrate under different medium[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry,2016,44(8):113-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2016.08.041
    [18]
    张晓沛. 再生水回灌区地下水水化学特征及三氮迁移模拟[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2017.
    [19]
    梁少攀. 天津8·12事故后硝酸盐在土壤地下水中的迁移规律研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018. ⊕

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (60) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return