Volume 14 Issue 5
Sep.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YU T,WANG J Y,FAN H D,et al.Study on distribution characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural and forestry soil nutrients of Chongming Island[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(5):1412-1418 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20240422
Citation: YU T,WANG J Y,FAN H D,et al.Study on distribution characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural and forestry soil nutrients of Chongming Island[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2024,14(5):1412-1418 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20240422

Study on distribution characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural and forestry soil nutrients of Chongming Island

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20240422
  • Received Date: 2024-06-25
  • Accepted Date: 2024-08-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-07-17
  • It is of great significance for the sustainable development of the agriculture and forestry ecology of Chongming Island in Shanghai to scientifically evaluate the storage status of agricultural and forestry soil nutrients and expound their spatial distribution characteristics. According to four main agricultural and forestry planting types (grain field, vegetable field, orchard and ecological forest) and three representative soil types (paddy soil, tidal soil and coastal saline soil), 100 soil samples of 0-20 cm were collected to analyze the distribution characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural and forestry soil nutrients of Chongming Island. The results showed that the average pH and electrical conductivity (EC) values of agricultural and forestry soils of Chongming Island were 7.99, 0.56 mS/cm, respectively, and the average organic matter content was 17.29 g/kg, belonging to the lower middle level; the average total nitrogen content was 1.91 g/kg, belonging to the rich level; and the average total phosphorus content was 1.33 g/kg, belonging to the upper middle level. The agricultural and forestry soil of Chongming Island was basically alkaline, with lower EC value in the central part, higher soil organic matter in the southern and central part and lower in the eastern part. Total nitrogen content was at a relatively high level in the middle and low in the west. The distribution pattern of total phosphorus was higher in the middle and decreased gradually from south to northeast and southeast. There were significant differences in soil nutrient indexes under different planting methods. Grain field had the highest organic matter content (19.20 g/kg) and vegetable field had the highest total nitrogen content (2.17 g/kg). Soil EC value and total phosphorus content were in the order of vegetable field > orchard > grain field > ecological forest. The contents of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in different soil types were paddy soil > tidal soil > coastal salt soil, while the highest organic matter content of tidal soil was 18.00 g/kg, with the lowest EC value. The distribution of agricultural and forestry soil nutrients of Chongming Island was significantly affected by planting methods. In summary, the selection of rice planting mode is conducive to the improvement of agricultural and forestry soil nutrients of Chongming Island.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    吴占景, 饶碧玉, 罗绍芹, 等. 不同土壤肥力对当归品质和产量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2011,42(11):1361-1364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2011.11.014

    WU Z J, RAO B Y, LUO S Q, et al. Influence of different soil fertility on yield and quality of angelica[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture,2011,42(11):1361-1364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2011.11.014
    [2]
    赖宁, 陈署晃, 付彦博, 等. 基于GIS的南疆果园土壤肥力评价[J]. 新疆农业科学,2019,56(8):1476-1486.

    LAI N, CHEN S H, FU Y B, et al. Soil fertility evaluation of orchards in southern of Xinjiang based on GIS[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2019,56(8):1476-1486.
    [3]
    夏春华, 方斌, 张志成, 等. 土壤养分空间分异对农地利用及其景观格局的响应: 以淮海经济区徐州市铜山区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(19): 1-19.

    XIA C H, FANG B, ZHANG Z C, et al. Response of soil nutien spatial dilerentiation to agriculural land use and landecape patlern: taking Tongshan Districl, Xuzhou City, Huaihai Economic Zone as an example[J]. Acta Eeologica Sinica, 2024, 44(19): 1-19.
    [4]
    卿小燕, 郭蕾, 赵克琼, 等. 松花坝水源区不同土地利用方式对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报,2021,33(9):68-74.

    QING X Y, GUO L, ZHAO K Q, et al. Effects of different land use types on physicochemical properties of soil in Songhuaba Reservoir[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi,2021,33(9):68-74.
    [5]
    张翰林, 宋科, 施俭, 等. 崇明岛深层土壤有机碳空间分布及碳储存特征分析[J]. 中国农业气象,2017,38(9):567-573.

    ZHANG H L, SONG K, SHI J, et al. Spatial distribution and storage feature of deep soil organic carbon in Chongming Island[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2017,38(9):567-573.
    [6]
    宁沐蕾. 崇明不同土地利用方式对土壤碳、氮及微生物群落结构的影响[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2017.
    [7]
    FANG X, XUE Z J, LI B C, et al. Soil organic carbon distribution in relation to land use and its storage in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. CATENA,2012,88(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2011.07.012
    [8]
    张智顺. 崇明岛人工林群落特征及其土壤理化性质研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2010.
    [9]
    苏敬华, 王屿岑, 孔若楠, 等. 崇明岛稻田三种种植方式下中小型土壤动物群落多样性[J]. 动物学杂志,2023,58(3):381-389.
    [10]
    史鸿志, 韩根成. 藓类泥炭对崇明岛潮土类耕地土壤养分及酸碱度的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报,2023,29(7):142-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2023.07.033
    [11]
    王庆峰, 褚长彬, 赵峥, 等. 崇明三岛柑橘园土壤养分特征研究[J]. 上海农业学报,2022,38(2):70-75.
    [12]
    贾娇, 何萍, 徐杰, 等. 天津中东部平原区土壤盐分空间分布特征[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(4):711-719. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200221

    JIA J, HE P, XU J, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in the middle and eastern plain of Tianjin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(4):711-719. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200221
    [13]
    何小勤. 长江口崇明东滩现代地貌过程研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2004.
    [14]
    YANG S L, DING P X, CHEN S L. Changes in progradation rate of the tidal flats at the mouth of the Changjiang (Yangtze) River, China[J]. Geomorphology,2001,38(1/2):167-180.
    [15]
    隋淑梅, 刘明池, 崔锦, 等. 灌溉量对温室基质栽培茄子产量、品质与根区盐分积累的影响[J]. 节水灌溉,2023(11):56-65. doi: 10.12396/jsgg.2023218
    [16]
    孙玉冰, 邓守彦, 李德志, 等. 崇明县土壤主要理化指标的空间分布与变异特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(4):306-312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2010.04.004

    SUN Y B, DENG S Y, LI D Z, et al. Spatial distribution and variability of main soil physical and chemical properties in Chongming and affecting factors[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2010,26(4):306-312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2010.04.004
    [17]
    张一清, 王文娥, 胡笑涛, 等. 土壤电导率对土壤含盐量及施肥浓度的响应试验研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2023,28(3):176-187. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2023.03.16

    ZHANG Y Q, WANG W E, HU X T, et al. Experimental study on the response of soil conductivity to soil salt content and fertilizer concentration[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University,2023,28(3):176-187. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2023.03.16
    [18]
    WEI L, GE T D, ZHU Z K, et al. Paddy soils have a much higher microbial biomass content than upland soils: a review of the origin, mechanisms, and drivers[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022, 326: 107798.
    [19]
    李凤博, 牛永志, 高文玲, 等. 耕作方式和秸秆还田对直播稻田土壤理化性质及其产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2008,39(3):549-552. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2008.03.018

    LI F B, NIU Y Z, GAO W L, et al. Effects of tillage styles and straw return on soil properties and crop yields in direct seeding rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2008,39(3):549-552. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2008.03.018
    [20]
    潘世娟. 长期定位施肥条件下水田土壤有机质和全氮累积变化研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2011: 39.
    [21]
    LIU B, XIA H, JIANG C C, et al. 14 year applications of chemical fertilizers and crop straw effects on soil labile organic carbon fractions, enzyme activities and microbial community in rice-wheat rotation of middle China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,841:156608. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156608
    [22]
    郭劲松, 黄轩民, 张彬, 等. 三峡库区消落带土壤有机质和全氮含量分布特征[J]. 湖泊科学,2012,24(2):213-219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5427.2012.02.007

    GUO J S, HUANG X M, ZHANG B, et al. Distribution characteristics of organic matter and total nitrogen in the soils of water-levelfluctuating zone of Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences,2012,24(2):213-219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5427.2012.02.007
    [23]
    CAMPBELL B J, KIRCHMAN D L. Bacterial diversity, community structure and potential growth rates along an estuarine salinity gradient[J]. The ISME Journal,2013,7(1):210-220. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.93
    [24]
    李俊良, 崔德杰, 孟祥霞, 等. 山东寿光保护地蔬菜施肥现状及问题的研究[J]. 土壤通报,2002,33(2):126-128. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2002.02.014

    LI J L, CUI D J, MENG X X, et al. The study of fertilization condition and question in protectorate vegetable in Shouguang, Shandong[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2002,33(2):126-128. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2002.02.014
    [25]
    陈碧华, 孙丽, 李新峥, 等. 新乡市大棚菜田土壤养分及盐分的演变[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(15):83-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.15.011

    CHEN B H, SUN L, LI X Z, et al. Evolution of soil nutrient and salts in vegetable field of greenhouse in Xinxiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2013,29(15):83-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.15.011
    [26]
    刘洋, 彭正萍, 王艳群, 等. 不同褐土区菜地与相邻粮田土壤性状比对研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2017,40(6):21-26.

    LIU Y, PENG Z P, WANG Y Q, et al. Study on the soil characters of vegetable field and adjacent grain field in different cinnamon areas[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University,2017,40(6):21-26.
    [27]
    廖思远, 秦延文, 刘志超, 等. 邛海流域设施葡萄园土壤养分与地下水污染特征研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(2):597-606. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210497

    LIAO S Y, QIN Y W, LIU Z C, et al. Characteristics of soil nutrients and groundwater pollution of greenhouse vineyards in Qionghai Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(2):597-606. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210497
    [28]
    李双喜, 袁大伟, 郑宪清, 等. 崇明岛典型果园氮素渗漏流失研究[J]. 江苏农业学报,2012,28(4):771-776. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2012.04.016

    LI S X, YUAN D W, ZHENG X Q, et al. Nitrogen leaching losses in typical orchard of Chongming Island[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2012,28(4):771-776. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2012.04.016
    [29]
    刘建文, 刘艳美. 对加强生态林建设与保护的思考[J]. 种子科技,2020,38(13):130-131.
    [30]
    张文渊. 滨海地区盐碱土类型与形成条件分析[J]. 水土保持通报,1999,19(1):19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-288X.1999.01.004
    [31]
    刘广明, 彭世彰, 杨劲松. 不同控制灌溉方式下稻田土壤盐分动态变化研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2007,23(7):86-89. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2007.07.016

    LIU G M, PENG S Z, YANG J S. Soil salt dynamics of rice field under different controlled irrigation conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2007,23(7):86-89. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2007.07.016
    [32]
    马常宝, 卢昌艾, 任意, 等. 土壤地力和长期施肥对潮土区小麦和玉米产量演变趋势的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(4):796-802. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11368

    MA C B, LU C A, REN Y, et al. Effect of soil fertility and long-term fertilizer application on the yields of wheat and maize in fluvo-aquic soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers,2012,18(4):796-802. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11368
    [33]
    KAISER K, GUGGENBERGER G, HAUMAIER L, et al. Dissolved organic matter sorption on sub soils and minerals studied by 13C-NMR and DRIFT spectroscopy[J]. European Journal of Soil Science,1997,48(2):301-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00550.x
    [34]
    BU X L, DING J M, WANG L M, et al. Biodegradation and chemical characteristics of hot-water extractable organic matter from soil under four different vegetation types in the Wuyi Mountains, Southeastern China[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2011,47(2):102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.11.009
    [35]
    文鑫, 王艺惠, 钟聪, 等. 贵州表层土壤有机质空间变异特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持学报,2023,37(3):218-224.

    WEN X, WANG Y H, ZHONG C, et al. Spatial variation of surface soil organic matter and its influencing factors in Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,37(3):218-224. □
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(60) PDF Downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return