Research progress of ecosystem air purification service
-
摘要: 生态系统服务对人类福祉和区域可持续发展具有不可替代性,净化空气是生态系统服务主要类型之一,对于人居质量改善和区域生态文明建设具有重要意义。对生态系统净化空气服务及其量化研究成果进行归纳整理,阐述了生态系统净化空气服务的来源、概念及内涵,归纳总结了市场理论法和生态模型法估算净化空气服务的优缺点,梳理了国内外相关研究实践与进展。针对净化空气服务研究理论体系不完善、时空动态研究方法较少、生态系统类型较单一和尺度整合研究成果不足等问题,提出未来应强化生态系统净化空气服务理论基础针对性,重视研究方法动态化和精准化,加强多尺度融合和生态系统类型多样性。Abstract: Ecosystem services are irreplaceable for human well-being and regional sustainable development. Air purification is one of the main types of ecosystem services, which is of great significance to the improvement of human settlement quality and the construction of regional ecological civilization. The ecosystem air purification service and its quantitative research results were reviewed, the source, concept and connotation of the ecosystem air purification service were elaborated, the advantages and disadvantages of the market theory method and the ecological model method for estimating air purification services were summarized, and the research practices and developments related to air purification services at home and abroad was combed. In view of the existing problems, such as the imperfect theoretical system of air purification service research, fewer research methods on temporal and spatial dynamics, relatively single ecosystem types, and insufficient research results on scale integration, it was suggested that the future research should strengthen the pertinence of the theoretical basis of ecosystem air purification services, pay attention to the dynamic and precise research method, and enhance the multi-scale integration and the diversity of ecosystem types, etc.
-
Key words:
- ecosystem services /
- air purification /
- evaluation method /
- value evaluation
-
表 1 净化空气服务价值评估方法
Table 1. Evaluation methods for the value of air purification services
方法类型 具体方法 概念 优点 缺点 直接市场
估算法市场价值法[18, 24] 使用市场价格充当货币价值的一种近似值指标,估计净化空气服务价值,以其在交易和转让中形成的
价格估算明确反映个人消费者偏好和真实支付意愿,结果较为客观 供应水平难以衡量,忽略间接效益,难以准确计算净化空气服务新增价值量 替代市场
估算法影子工程法[19] 使用技术手段获得净化空气服务以相同效用所需的生产费用为依据,间接地估算价值量,我国学者使用较多 将不可量化的问题转化为可量化的问题,简化了估价过程 影子工程法只是对净化空气服务的近似代替,评估结果存在一定的偏差 替代消费法[15] 根据现有的可用替代品的成本估计净化空气服务的经济价值 可以根据替代品成本评价不具有市场性的服务 净化空气服务可替代的产品少,准确计量难度大 表 2 净化空气服务价值评估生态模型的比较
Table 2. Comparison of ecological models for evaluating the value of air purification services
模型名称 研发机构 用途 所需数据 模型优缺点 CITYgreen[39, 41-42] 美国林务局 城市绿色空间的规划管理、净化效益计算和动态变化的模拟预测 研究区域不同年份已分类的遥感影像,选择适宜分辨率的航片,土地利用现状矢量图、行政区划矢量图 优点为基于地理信息系统,用于城市森林结构分析与净化空气效益评价,可视化表达研究结果;缺点为对遥感图像要求比较高,影像要预先分类 i-Tree[43-45] 美国林务局 城市和农村林业分析和效益评估工具 样地数据、气象数据、空气污染浓度数据、各树种对空气质量的影响排序数据、大气边界层高度等 优点为可针对不同树种设定具体参数信息,估算物种丰富度和多样性,评估结果准确度高;缺点为分析结果需提交美国林务局审核,比较被动,耗时较久 -
[1] DAILY G C. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997. [2] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, de GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25(1):3-15. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2 [3] WALLACE K J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions[J]. Biological Conservation,2007,139(3/4):235-246. [4] BOYD J, BANZHAF S. What are ecosystem services: the need for standardized environmental accounting units[J]. Ecological Economics,2007,63(2/3):616-626. [5] FISHER B, KERRY T R. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation[J]. Biological Conservation,2008,141(5):1167-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019 [6] MILLENIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis[M]. Washington DC: Island Press , 2005. [7] IGAC计划大气气溶胶研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 1997, 12(5): 71-76. [8] 杜乐山, 李俊生, 刘高慧, 等.生态系统与生物多样性经济学(TEEB)研究进展[J]. 生物多样性,2016,24(6):686-693. doi: 10.17520/biods.2016033DU L S, LI J S, LIU G H, et al. Progress in the researches on the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity(TEEB)[J]. Biodiversity Science,2016,24(6):686-693. doi: 10.17520/biods.2016033 [9] 侯元兆. 中国森林资源核算研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1995. [10] 孟祥江, 侯元兆.森林生态系统服务价值核算理论与评估方法研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究,2010,23(6):8-12.MENG X J, HOU Y Z. Research advance in valuation theory and assessment method of forest ecosystem services[J]. World Forestry Research,2010,23(6):8-12. [11] 欧阳志云, 王如松, 赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.1999.05.034OUYANG Z Y, WANG R S, ZHAO J Z. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,1999,10(5):635-640. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.1999.05.034 [12] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁.全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 资源科学,2001,23(6):5-9. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2001.06.002XIE G D, LU C X, CHENG S K. Progress in evaluating the global ecosystem services[J]. Resources Science,2001,23(6):5-9. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2001.06.002 [13] 傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞, 等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J]. 地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.06.001FU B J, ZHOU G Y, BAI Y F, et al. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2009,24(6):571-576. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2009.06.001 [14] 肖寒, 欧阳志云, 赵景柱, 等.森林生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评估初探: 以海南岛尖峰岭热带森林为例[J]. 应用生态学报,2000,11(4):481-484. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.04.001XIAO H, OUYANG Z Y, ZHAO J Z, et al. Forest ecosystem services and their ecological valuation:a case study of tropical forest in Jianfengling of Hainan island[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2000,11(4):481-484. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.04.001 [15] 吴钢, 肖寒, 赵景柱, 等.长白山森林生态系统服务功能[J]. 中国科学(C辑: 生命科学),2001,31(5):471-480. [16] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报,2004,19(4):480-491. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2004.04.010ZHAO T Q, OUYANG Z Y, ZHENG H, et al. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2004,19(4):480-491. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2004.04.010 [17] 靳芳, 鲁绍伟, 余新晓, 等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1531-1536. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.08.029JIN F, LU S W, YU X X, et al. Forest ecosystem service and its evaluation in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,16(8):1531-1536. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2005.08.029 [18] 王景升, 李文华, 任青山, 等.西藏森林生态系统服务价值[J]. 自然资源学报,2007,22(5):831-841. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2007.05.019WANG J S, LI W H, REN Q S, et al. The value of Tibet's forest ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2007,22(5):831-841. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2007.05.019 [19] 胡海胜.庐山自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 资源科学,2007,29(5):28-36. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2007.05.005HU H S. Evaluation of the service value of the forest ecosystem in Lushan Mountain Nature Reserve[J]. Resources Science,2007,29(5):28-36. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2007.05.005 [20] 周月明. 天山北坡山地森林空气净化功能分析及生态价值评价[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2010. [21] 赵金龙, 王泺鑫, 韩海荣, 等.森林生态系统服务功能价值评估研究进展与趋势[J]. 生态学杂志,2013,32(8):2229-2237.ZHAO J L, WANG L X, HAN H R, et al. Research advances and trends in forest ecosystem services value evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2013,32(8):2229-2237. [22] 李琼. 广州市城市森林生态服务功能研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林学院, 2005. [23] 李晓阁. 城市森林净化大气功能分析及评价[D]. 长沙: 中南林学院, 2005. [24] 柳云龙, 朱建青, 施振香, 等.上海城市绿地净化服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(5):28-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.05.006LIU Y L, ZHU J Q, SHI Z X, et al. Purification services and their value assessment of city green space in Shanghai[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment,2009,19(5):28-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.05.006 [25] 张绪良, 徐宗军, 张朝晖, 等.青岛市城市绿地生态系统的环境净化服务价值[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(9):2576-2584.ZHANG X L, XU Z J, ZHANG Z H, et al. Environment purification service value of urban green space ecosystem in Qingdao City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(9):2576-2584. [26] 张文文, 孙宁骁, 韩玉洁.上海城市森林生态系统净化大气环境功能评估[J]. 中国城市林业,2018,16(4):17-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2018.04.004ZHANG W W, SUN N X, HAN Y J. Assessment of atmospheric purification function of urban forest ecosystem in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry,2018,16(4):17-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2018.04.004 [27] 韩玉洁, 孙文, 张文文.基于分布式测算方法的上海城市森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019(2):147-155.HAN Y J, SUN W, ZHANG W W. Evaluation of ecosystem services for urban forests in Shanghai based on a distribution measurement methodology[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science),2019(2):147-155. [28] 赵正, 韩锋, 侯一蕾.基于Meta回归方法的中国城市森林生态系统服务功能价值再评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(1):64-75.ZHAO Z, HAN F, HOU Y L. Revaluation of urban forest ecosystem services function in China: based on meta-regression analysis[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2021,30(1):64-75. [29] 刘尧, 张玉钧, 贾倩.生态系统服务价值评估方法研究[J]. 环境保护,2017,45(6):64-68.LIU Y, ZHANG Y J, JIA Q. Study on the methods of ecosystem services valuation[J]. Environmental Protection,2017,45(6):64-68. [30] 国家林业和草原局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范: GB/T 38582—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. [31] 张三焕, 赵国柱, 田允哲, 等.长白山珲春林区森林资源资产生态环境价值的评估研究[J]. 延边大学学报(自然科学版),2001,27(2):126-134.ZHANG S H, ZHAO G Z, TIAN Y Z, et al. Study on value the ecological environment valuation of forestry resource: for case by Hunchun forestry in Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Yanbian University (Natural Science Edition),2001,27(2):126-134. [32] 王玉芹. 厦门城市森林生态系统服务功能及价值评价[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2011. [33] 施晓清, 赵景柱, 吴钢, 等.生态系统的净化服务及其价值研究[J]. 应用生态学报,2001,12(6):908-912. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2001.06.026SHI X Q, ZHAO J Z, WU G, et al. Purifying service of ecosystem and its value[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2001,12(6):908-912. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2001.06.026 [34] 康文星.森林生态系统服务功能价值评估方法研究综述[J]. 中南林学院学报,2005,25(6):128-131.KANG W X. Review of evaluation system on the value of forest ecosystems services[J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University,2005,25(6):128-131. [35] 李丽, 王心源, 骆磊, 等.生态系统服务价值评估方法综述[J]. 生态学杂志,2018,37(4):1233-1245.LI L, WANG X Y, LUO L, et al. A systematic review on the methods of ecosystem services value assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2018,37(4):1233-1245. [36] 刘玉龙, 马俊杰, 金学林, 等.生态系统服务功能价值评估方法综述[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(1):88-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.01.020LIU Y L, MA J J, JIN X L, et al. Summary of assessment methods for valuation of ecosystem service function[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2005,15(1):88-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.01.020 [37] 张振明, 刘俊国.生态系统服务价值研究进展[J]. 环境科学学报,2011,31(9):1835-1842.ZHANG Z M, LIU J G. Progress in the valuation of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2011,31(9):1835-1842. [38] 周晨, 李国平.生态系统服务价值评估方法研究综述: 兼论条件价值法理论进展[J]. 生态经济,2018,34(12):207-214.ZHOU C, LI G P. A review of evaluation methods of ecosystem services: also on the theoretical progress of contingent valuation method[J]. Ecological Economy,2018,34(12):207-214. [39] 陈莉, 李佩武, 李贵才, 等.应用CITYgreen模型评估深圳市绿地净化空气与固碳释氧效益[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(1):272-282. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.01.033CHEN L, LI P W, LI G C, et al. Application of CITYgreen model in air purification, carbon fixation and oxygen release by greenbelt system of Shenzhen City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29(1):272-282. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.01.033 [40] 邱雯婉, 张敏霞, 鲍沁星.i-Tree模型在城市森林景观绩效量化中的应用评析[J]. 浙江林业科技,2019,39(5):106-116.QIU W W, ZHANG M X, BAO Q X. Evaluation on application of i-Tree model in urban forest quantification[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2019,39(5):106-116. [41] 郑中霖. 基于CITYgreen模型的城市森林生态效益评价研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2006. [42] 李薇. CITYgreen软件在城市绿地生态效益评价中的应用 : 以奥林匹克森林公园规划方案为例[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2007. [43] 马宁, 何兴元, 石险峰, 等.基于i-Tree模型的城市森林经济效益评估[J]. 生态学杂志,2011,30(4):810-817.MA N, HE X Y, SHI X F, et al. Assessment of urban forest economic benefits based on i-Tree model: research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2011,30(4):810-817. [44] 张玉阳, 周春玲, 董运斋, 等.基于i-Tree模型的青岛市南区行道树组成及生态效益分析[J]. 生态学杂志,2013,32(7):1739-1747.ZHANG Y Y, ZHOU C L, DONG Y Z, et al. Composition and ecological benefits of street trees in Shinan District of Qingdao City, Shandong Province based on i-Tree Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2013,32(7):1739-1747. [45] 刘朋朋. 基于i-Tree模型杭州西湖景区行道树生态效益分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018. [46] 管东生, 刘秋海, 莫大伦.广州城市建成区绿地对大气二氧化硫的净化作用[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版),1999,38(2):110-114.GUAN D S, LIU Q H, MO D L. The role of Guangzhou urban vegetation in removing atmospheric sulfur[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,1999,38(2):110-114. [47] 鲁敏, 李英杰.部分园林植物对大气污染物吸收净化能力的研究[J]. 山东建筑工程学院学报,2002,17(2):45-49.LU M, LI Y J. Research on absorption and purgation ability to atmospheric pollutants of some garden plants[J]. Journal of Shandong Institute of Architecture and Engineering,2002,17(2):45-49. [48] 《中国生物多样性国情研究报告》编写组. 中国生物多样性国情研究报告[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1998. [49] American Forests. CITYgreen: calculating the value of nature[M]. Washington DC: American Forests, 1999. [50] BRACK C L. Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest[J]. Environmental Pollution,2002,116:S195-S200. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00251-2 [51] SOLECKI W D, ROSENZWEIG C, PARSHALL L, et al. Mitigation of the heat island effect in urban New Jersey[J]. Environmental Hazards,2005,6(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.hazards.2004.12.002 [52] NOWAK D J, CRANE D E, STEVENS J C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2006,4(3/4):115-123. [53] ESCOBEDO F J, WAGNER J E, NOWAK D J, et al. Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2008,86(1):148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.029 [54] CURRIE B A, BASS B. Estimates of air pollution mitigation with green plants and green roofs using the UFORE model[J]. Urban Ecosystems,2008,11(4):409-422. doi: 10.1007/s11252-008-0054-y [55] SONG C, LEE W K, CHOI H A, et al. Spatial assessment of ecosystem functions and services for air purification of forests in South Korea[J]. Environmental Science & Policy,2016,63:27-34. [56] ZOULIA I, SANTAMOURIS M, DIMOUDI A. Monitoring the effect of urban green areas on the heat island in Athens[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2008,156(1/2/3/4):275-292. [57] DUNN-JOHNSTON K A, KREUZWIESER J, HIRABAYASHI S, et al. Isoprene emission factors for subtropical street trees for regional air quality modeling[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2016,45(1):234-243. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.01.0051 [58] GUIDOLOTTI G, SALVIATO M, CALFAPIETRA C. Comparing estimates of EMEP MSC-W and UFORE models in air pollutant reduction by urban trees[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2016,23(19):19541-19550. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7135-x [59] JAYASOORIYA V M, NG A WM, MUTHUKUMARAN S, et al. Green infrastructure practices for improvement of urban air quality[J]. Urban For Urban Green,2017,21:34-47. ⊗ doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.007
计量
- 文章访问数: 518
- HTML全文浏览量: 290
- PDF下载量: 47
- 被引次数: 0