Key issues and countermeasures of aircraft noise impact assessment in civil airports
-
摘要:
为了更好地指导民用机场航空器噪声环境影响评价实践，对机场航空器噪声影响评价案例进行分析与总结，发现航空器噪声环境影响评价工作中存在评价范围确定合理性不足、噪声标准适用性不强、噪声预测模式相对落后及噪声防治措施不全面等问题。针对以上问题，推荐了合理的评价范围划定方法、噪声评价标准，提出了噪声预测模式发展方向，汇总了较全面、较先进的噪声防治措施，并针对未来航空器噪声影响评价提出了建立我国航空器噪声源数据库、开发航空器噪声预测软件及加快制定适应性强的技术导则和标准等建议。
Abstract:In order to guide the environmental impact evaluation practice of aircraft noise in civil airports, by analyzing and summarizing the cases of airport aircraft noise impact assessment, it was figured out that there were some problems in aircraft noise environmental impact assessment, such as insufficient rationality in determining the assessment scope, the weak applicability of noise standard, the relative backwardness of the noise prediction model, and the non-comprehensive of noise prevention and control measures. In view of the above problems, the reasonable evaluation-scope delimiting method and noise evaluation standards were recommended, the development directions of the noise prediction model were proposed, and more comprehensive and advanced noise prevention measures were summarized. The suggestions were given on future aircraft noise impact assessment, such as establishing an aircraft noise source database, developing aircraft noise prediction software and speeding up the formulation of technical guidelines and standards with strong adaptability.
-
Key words:
- civil airport /
- aircraft /
- noise impact assessment /
- assessment range /
- assessment value
-
图 1 不同情景下噪声影响范围与推荐评价范围对比示意
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of noise impact range and evaluation range recommended under different scenarios
图 2 大幅错开的平行构型多跑道噪声影响评价范围2种划定方法示意
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of two delineation methods for the noise impact assessment scope of multiple runways in parallel configuration that are greatly staggered
图 3 典型机场不同LAmax限值下超标声环境保护目标的对比
注：实线代表伦敦希思罗机场夜间LAmax限值要求，虚线代表《香港规划标准与准则》中直升机噪声LAmax限值要求。
Figure 3. Comparison of environmental protection targets exceeding standard values at different LAmax limits in typical airports
表 1 不同情景下噪声影响范围与推荐评价范围对比
Table 1. Comparison of noise impact range and evaluation range recommended in HJ 2.4-2021 under different scenarios
情景 情景设定 70 dB等声级线影响范围 推荐评价范围面积/
km2面积增加百分比1）/% 跑道两侧距离/
km跑道两端距离/
km所围矩形面积/
km2情景一 不同航向起飞降落比例为1∶1，起飞后直飞 各1.04 各6.39 33.53 163.22 387 情景二 不同航向起飞降落比例为1∶1，起飞后侧偏30° 分别为1.04、2.71 分别为6.38、4.68 53.36 163.22 206 情景三 不同航向起飞降落比例为1∶9，起飞后直飞 各1.17 分别为4.96、7.54 36.97 163.22 342 情景四 不同航向起飞降落比例为1∶9，起飞后侧偏30° 分别为1.15、3.69 分别为4.96、6.37 70.00 182.52 161 1）指推荐评价范围的面积较70 dB等声级线影响范围所围矩形面积增加的百分比。全文同。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 国内典型机场噪声影响范围与推荐评价范围对比
Table 2. Comparison between noise actual impact range and evaluation range recommended of typical domestic airports
机场
代号70 dB等声级线影响范
围所围矩形面积/km2推荐评价
范围面积/km2面积增加
百分比/%机场1 78.87 168.66 114 机场2 115.49 159.87 38 机场3 76.36 182.63 139 机场4 74.78 111.50 49 机场5 108.63 123.43 14 机场6 46.17 168.66 114
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 航空器噪声建议评价范围
Table 3. Recommended evaluation range for aircraft noise
机场类别 距离跑道两端
距离/km距离跑道中心线两侧
距离/km干线、枢纽运输机场 ≥8 ≥2 其他运输机场 ≥6 ≥1 通用机场 ≥3 ≥0.5
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 航空器噪声评价量及建议限值
Table 4. Aircraft noise evaluation value and recommended limits
dB(A) 评价量 符号 居民区 文教区 日均噪声评价量 LWECPN1） 752） 702） Ldn 573） 623） 单次飞行补充噪声评价量 夜间 SEL 105 —4） 日间 LAmax 89 70 1）单位为dB；2）限值参考GB 9660—88 机场周围区域飞机噪声环境质量标准；3）限值参考《机场周围区域飞机噪声环境质量标准》（三次征求意见稿）；4）文教区一般夜间办公或从事教学活动的情况较少，因此不予设置限值。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 林逢春, 陆雍森.中国环境影响评价体系评估研究[J]. 环境科学研究,1999,12(2):8-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.1999.02.002LIN F C, LU Y S. Evaluation of the enironmental impact assessment system in China[J]. Research of Enironmental Sciences,1999,12(2):8-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.1999.02.002 [2] 蔡靖, 张宇辉. 机场噪声预测评价方法综述[C]//第七届全国交通运输领域青年学术会议论文集. 北京: 中国交通运输协会, 2007. [3] 张慧娟, 郝大力, 王辰辉, 等.机场噪声标准评价量关系分析[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2018,38(3):128-131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2018.03.024ZHANG H J, HAO D L, WANG C H, et al. Analysis and comparison of airport noise evaluation standards[J]. Noise and Vibration Control,2018,38(3):128-131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2018.03.024 [4] 汪贇, 白煜, 沈松, 等.机场周围区域飞机噪声监测方法对比研究[J]. 中国环境监测,2018,34(5):113-118. doi: 10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2018.05.16WANG Y, BAI Y, SHEN S, et al. Comparison of the monitoring methods of aircraft noise in the vicinity of airports[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China,2018,34(5):113-118. doi: 10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2018.05.16 [5] 王维.我国机场噪声评价量与噪声影响的定量关系[J]. 应用声学,2004,23(1):8-11. doi: 10.11684/j.issn.1000-310X.2004.01.003WANG W. A quantitative relation between the airport noise metric used in China and the airport noise impact[J]. Applied Acoustics,2004,23(1):8-11. doi: 10.11684/j.issn.1000-310X.2004.01.003 [6] 王艳华, 冯霞, 徐涛.机场噪声评价量分析与比较[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2013,33(2):178-182.WANG Y H, FENG X, XU T. Analysis and comparison of airport noise metrics[J]. Noise and Vibration Control,2013,33(2):178-182. [7] 沈颖, 陈荣生.机场周围飞机噪声评价参数及标准初探[J]. 噪声与振动控制,1999,19(2):34-36. [8] 杨青青, 郝晓帆, 解江, 等.航空器噪声环境影响评定方法发展趋势研究[J]. 航空标准化与质量,2017(3):25-31.YANG Q Q, HAO X F, XIE J, et al. Research on development trend of aircraft noise evaluation methods in the environmental impact[J]. Aeronautic Standardization & Quality,2017(3):25-31. [9] 肖慧慧, 王超, 徐肖豪.机场飞机噪声评价量及其限值的探讨[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2011,31(2):134-137.XIAO H H, WANG C, XU X H. Discussion on aircraft noise evaluation parameters in airport and their limited values[J]. Noise and Vibration Control,2011,31(2):134-137. [10] PEARSONS K S, BARBER D S, TABACHNICK B G. Analyses of the predictability of noise-induced sleep disturbance[R]. Defense Technical Information Center, 1990. [11] LIND S J, PEARSON K, FIDELL S. Sound insulation requirements for mitigation of aircraft noise impact on highline school district facilities volume I[R]. America: BBN Systems and Technologies, 2005. [12] 徐涛, 胡惠裕.关于多跑道机场噪声优化预测方法[J]. 计算机仿真,2016,33(12):62-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2016.12.014XU T, HU H Y. Optimization of multi-runway airports noise prediction[J]. Computer Simulation,2016,33(12):62-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2016.12.014 [13] 徐涛, 苏瀚, 杨国庆.基于空间拟合和神经网络的机场噪声预测集成模型[J]. 中国环境科学,2016,36(4):1250-1257. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2016.04.042XU T, SU H, YANG G Q. Airport noise prediction ensemble model based on space fitting and neural network[J]. China Environmental Science,2016,36(4):1250-1257. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2016.04.042 [14] 林泽龙.基于GIS的机场噪声预测评估[J]. 中国科技信息,2018(15):40-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8972.2018.15.010 [15] 王雨晨.基于国外机场噪声管理经验对我国现阶段机场噪声治理的启示[J]. 科技创新导报,2019,16(20):12-13. doi: 10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098X.2019.20.012 [16] ICAO. Aircraft noise[EB/OL]. [2022-03-15]. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Pages/noise. [17] 刘成学.机场噪音干扰公众生活问题的综合治理策略[J]. 交通科技与管理,2021(34):163-164. [18] 曾庆华, 徐志胜.基于降低飞机噪声影响的机场场址与跑道构型优化研究[J]. 环境影响评价,2017,39(6):31-33. doi: 10.14068/j.ceia.2017.06.008ZENG Q H, XU Z S. Study on airport site and runway layout optimization to reduce aircraft noise impact[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment,2017,39(6):31-33. doi: 10.14068/j.ceia.2017.06.008 [19] 赵仁兴, 尹建坤, 马丽霞.协调机场及周边土地利用规划减少飞机噪声影响[J]. 环境影响评价,2015,37(2):61-65.ZHAO R X, YIN J K, MA L X. Coordinate land use planning for airport and its surroundings to reduce noise influence[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment,2015,37(2):61-65. [20] 孙宏, 黄赶祥, 周杰松.法兰克福机场噪音收费制度研究[J]. 科技和产业,2015,15(7):86-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1807.2015.07.018SUN H, HUANG G X, ZHOU J S. Study on Frankfurt Airport noise charge system[J]. Science Technology and Industry,2015,15(7):86-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1807.2015.07.018 [21] SREENATH S, SUDHAKAR K, YUSOP A. Sustainability at airports: technologies and best practices from ASEAN countries[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2021,299:113639. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113639 [22] VINKX K. Effective communication using aircraft noise visualisations will improve the noise debate[EB/OL]. [2022-3-15]. https://to70.com/effective-communication-using-aircraft-noise-visualizations-will-improve-the-noise-debate/. [23] GASCO L, ASENSIO C, de ARCAS G. Communicating airport noise emission data to the general public[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017,586:836-848. □ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.063 -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 435
- HTML全文浏览量: 211
- PDF下载量: 36
- 被引次数: 0
