浙江山区26县绿色发展效率的时空格局及影响因素

Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of green development efficiency of 26 mountainous counties in Zhejiang Province

  • 摘要: 提高绿色发展效率,缩小区域差距是推动山区县(市)迈向共同富裕的必经之路。采用超效率SBM模型和泰尔指数测度浙江山区26县(市、区)2010—2022年的绿色发展效率和区域差距,结合NICH指数和Hurst指数探讨绿色发展效率的未来趋势,运用面板Tobit模型识别绿色发展效率驱动因素。结果表明:1)研究期内,11个生态发展县的整体绿色发展效率始终高于15个跨越发展县,绿色发展效率区域差异逐渐缩小。2)空间敛散分布差异较大。下方发散型县域由低水平块状聚集向点状分散态势转变;下方收敛型县域由带状分布向块状集聚过渡;上方收敛型县域由中西部向东部转移;上方发散型县域相对分散。3)景宁畲族自治县、磐安县、青田县等县域的绿色发展效率未来将稳定高效增长,莲都区、龙泉市、遂昌县等县域未来将持续大幅下降,持续性和稳定性较低。4)城镇化和产业结构是提升山区26县(市、区)整体绿色发展效率的主要因素。对于生态发展县,产业结构的改善能显著提升其绿色发展效率。对于跨越发展县,城镇化是提升其绿色发展效率的关键。

     

    Abstract: Improving the efficiency of green development and narrowing the regional gaps are essential ways to promote mountainous counties to move towards common prosperity. The super-efficiency SBM model and the Theil coefficient were used to measure the green development efficiency and regional gaps of 26 mountainous counties (cities, districts) of Zhejiang Province from 2010 to 2022. The future development trend of green development efficiency was discussed by combining NICH index and Hurst index, and the panel Tobit model was used to identify the driving factors of green development efficiency. The results showed that: (1) During the study period, the overall green development efficiency of 11 ecological development counties was always higher than that of 15 leapfrog development counties, and the regional differences in green development efficiency had gradually narrowed. (2) The spatial convergence distribution was quite different. The bottom-divergent counties changed from low-level block aggregation to point-like dispersion; the bottom-convergent counties transitioned from banded distribution to block agglomeration; the top-convergent counties transferred from the central and western regions to the east; the top-divergent counties were relatively scattered. (3) In the foreseeable future, the green development efficiency of Jingning She Autonomous County, Panan County, and Qingtian County was projected to experience steady and efficient growth. Conversely, Liandu District, Longquan City, and Suichang County were anticipated to witness marked declines, characterized by low sustainability and stability in their green development endeavors. (4) Urbanization and industrial structure were the main factors to improve the overall green development efficiency of 26 mountainous counties (cities, districts). For ecological development counties, the improvement of industrial structure can significantly improve their green development efficiency. For leap-forward development counties, urbanization is the key to improving their green development efficiency.

     

/

返回文章
返回