基于PSFR模型的黄河流域吕梁段水生态安全评估

Aquatic ecological security assessment of Lüliang section of the Yellow River Basin based on PSFR model

  • 摘要: 基于压力-状态-功能-响应(PSFR)生态安全评估模型,从水生态压力、水生态状态、生态功能、社会响应4个方面构建了10个要素层、27个指标层的指标体系,并通过变异系数法分类分级地定量化评估黄河流域吕梁段水生态安全状态。结果表明:在5个安全等级标准下,研究区内15个子流域的水生态安全状态为不安全状态~较安全状态,未出现极不安全状态和非常安全状态。其中,处于不安全状态的子流域有3个,占比20.0%;处于基本安全状态的子流域有10个,占比66.7%;处于较安全状态的子流域数为2个,占比13.3%。此外,基于不同土地利用类型划分的3个片区水生态安全状态表现出显著的空间异质性,西部丘陵区水生态安全状况相对最优,但仍然受渔业供给量不足(年产量<120 t)、旅游资源开发受限(景点数量占比<32%)以及集中饮用水水质达标率低(<50%)等生态功能指标的制约;中部中山区水生态安全状况次之,其核心制约因子为点源污染负荷高、渔业供给能力不足(年产量<112 t)以及水域休闲面积占比低(<20%)等;东部平川区水生态安全状况最差,其影响因子呈现多维复杂性,面临人口密度高(290人/km²)、工业及居民用地面积占比大(工业用地占48%、农村居民点用地占39%、城镇用地占46%)、单位面积点源污染负荷高以及生态系统脆弱(如植被覆盖率<12%)等多重压力。针对黄河流域吕梁段各片区的水生态安全异质性胁迫因素开展保护修复工作,可全面推动流域水生态安全的有效提升。

     

    Abstract: Based on the Pressure-State-Function-Response (PSFR) ecological security assessment model, an index system of 10 element layers and 27 index layers was constructed from four aspects,i.e. aquatic ecological pressure, aquatic ecological state, ecological function and social response. This index system was applied to quantitatively evaluate the aquatic ecological security of the Lüliang section of the Yellow River Basin by the coefficient of variation method for classification and grading. The results showed that the aquatic ecological state of the 15 sub-watersheds in the study area could be classified into three groups: insecure, general secure and secure, with no instances of extremely insecure or very secure. Among the 15 sub-watersheds, 3 sub-watersheds were at the insecure ecological status, accounting for 20.0% of the total sub-watersheds, whereas 10 sub-watersheds were at the general secure status, representing 66.7%. In contrast, only 2 sub-watersheds were grouped at the secure status, accounting for 13.3%. Furthermore, the aquatic ecological security status of the three zones delineated by distinct land use types exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity. The western hilly zone demonstrated relatively optimal conditions, yet remained constrained by ecological functional indicators such as insufficient fishery supply (annual yield <120 tons), limited tourism resource development (scenic area coverage <32%), and low compliance rate of drinking water quality (<50%). The central mountainous zone ranked second, with core constraints including high point-source pollution loads, insufficient fishery supply (annual yield <112 tons), and low proportion of aquatic recreational areas (<20%). The eastern plain zone exhibited the poorest aquatic ecological security status, characterized by multidimensional complexity in influencing factors, including high population density (290 persons/km2), intensive industrial and residential land use (industrial areas 48%, rural settlements 39%, urban areas 46%), high point source pollution load per unit area and fragile ecosystem , and fragile ecosystems exemplified by low habitat coverage (<12%). Carrying out protection and restoration work on the heterogeneous stress factors of aquatic ecological security in various areas of Lüliang section of the Yellow River Basin can comprehensively promote the effective improvement of aquatic ecological security in the basin.

     

/

返回文章
返回