酸性矿山排水生态风险评估研究进展

Research progress on ecological risk assessment of acid mine drainage

  • 摘要: 酸性矿山排水(AMD)是矿产资源开发过程中产生的典型复合污染,其低pH、高金属离子及硫酸盐负荷对区域水环境、土壤生态及生物健康构成跨介质胁迫。为系统解析AMD生态风险评估的研究进展,整合前沿成果与典型案例,在明晰污染成因的基础上,阐明了风险源、驱动因子、暴露途径与多层级生态终点,评述了当前主流评估体系的特点及其局限。结果表明:明确评估对象、尺度与方法是揭示风险形成机理与实现有效管控的基础;AMD风险特征受不同驱动因子组合的显著调控,其中自然-人为复合风险源的贡献尤为突出;现有评估体系主要包括环境基准评估、暴露-效应评估与多尺度综合评估三类,其方法学处于从静态指数、生物毒性测试向过程机理与动态模型评估的范式转型。然而,现有评估实践仍受数据代表性不足、模型参数复杂、风险表征不充分等多重不确定性的制约。针对上述局限,未来研究可将多源遥感、同位素示踪、机器学习等新技术交叉融合,发展具有动态预警和跨尺度解析能力的智能评估模型;同时推动形成污染控制-生态修复-碳汇提升协同治理路径,以提升AMD风险预警精度与管控主动性,增强区域生态系统服务的可持续性。

     

    Abstract: Acid mine drainage (AMD) is a typical form of complex pollution generated during mineral resource development. Its low pH, high concentrations of metal ions, and sulfate load exert pervasive cross-media stress on regional aquatic environments, soil ecosystems, and biological health. To systematically analyze the research progress on AMD ecological risk assessment, this study integrates cutting-edge findings and representative case studies. Based on a clear understanding of the causes of pollution, it explicitly delineates risk sources, driving factors, exposure pathways, and multi-tiered ecological endpoints, and reviews the characteristics and limitations of current mainstream assessment systems. The results indicate that clearly defining the assessment targets, scales, and methods is fundamental to revealing the mechanisms of risk formation and achieving effective control. AMD risk characteristics are significantly regulated by different combinations of driving factors, with the contribution of combined natural and anthropogenic risk sources being particularly notable. Existing assessment systems mainly include environmental benchmark assessment, exposure-effect assessment, and multi-scale integrated assessment, and their methodologies are undergoing a paradigm shift from static indices and bio-toxicity tests to process mechanisms and dynamic model evaluations. However, current assessment practices are still hampered by a suite of interconnected uncertainties, including limited data representativeness, overly complex model parameterization, and insufficiently robust risk characterization. To address these limitations, future research can synergistically integrate multi-source remote sensing, isotope tracing, machine learning, and other emerging technologies to develop intelligent assessment models with dynamic early-warning and cross-scale analytical capabilities. Simultaneously, efforts should be made to promote a coordinated governance pathway of pollution control–ecological restoration–carbon sequestration enhancement to improve the accuracy of AMD risk warnings, enhance proactive management, and strengthen the sustainability of regional ecosystem services.

     

/

返回文章
返回