农村黑臭水体治理项目专项资金绩效评价研究

Research on performance evaluation of Special funds for rural black and Odorous Water body governance projects

  • 摘要: 农村黑臭水体治理工作是打好碧水保卫战的重要一环,近年来各级财政专项资金支持力度呈现增长态势,充分表明改善农村生态环境、落实农村黑臭水体治理任务的重要性。然而,在传统的项目专项资金绩效评价中,部分地区存在资金分配与治理需求脱节、预算执行率不高、治理效果不佳等问题,现有绩效评价体系与项目管理衔接不够、个性化设计不足等,存在改进的空间。据此,本文基于政策演进与现实需求双重驱动,采用德尔菲法与分度法等组合赋权策略,建立公众维度、财政资金维度、项目管理维度、可持续发展维度等评价指标,并构建准则层、三级指标等覆盖31项具体指标的绩效评价体系,旨在通过优化指标量化特征、增强个性化设计,进一步提升绩效评价的科学性与可操作性,优化农村黑臭水体治理项目资金绩效评价体系,提升财政资金使用效益、优化生态环境治理政策,同时,也为同类型生态环境领域资金绩效评价体系构建提供借鉴和参考。

     

    Abstract: The treatment of rural black and odorous water bodies is a crucial component of the broader effort to ensure clean water resources. In recent years, financial support from special funds at various levels has shown an upward trend, fully demonstrating the importance of improving the rural ecological environment and accomplishing the task of treating rural black and odorous water bodies. However, in traditional performance evaluations of special project funds, issues such as a disconnect between fund allocation and actual treatment needs, low budget execution rates, and suboptimal treatment outcomes have been observed in some regions. The existing performance evaluation system also shows room for improvement, including insufficient integration with project management and a lack of tailored design.Driven by both policy evolution and practical needs, this paper adopts a combined weighting strategy, including the Delphi Method and the Scaled Method, to establish evaluation indicators across dimensions such as public engagement, fiscal fund utilization, project management, and sustainability. A performance evaluation system covering 31 specific indicators across criterion and tertiary levels is constructed. By optimizing the quantitative characteristics of the indicators and enhancing personalized design, this study aims to improve the scientific rigor and operability of performance evaluation, refine the fund performance evaluation system for rural black and odorous water body treatment projects, enhance the efficiency of fiscal fund utilization, and optimize ecological environment governance policies. Additionally, it provides a reference for constructing fund performance evaluation systems in similar ecological and environmental fields.

     

/

返回文章
返回