城镇污水处理厂综合效益评价——以辽河流域为例

Evaluation of comprehensive benefits of urban sewage treatment plants: taking Liaohe River Basin as an example

  • 摘要: 从污水处理厂的运行成本和环境效益2个方面出发,建立了含有单位处理量建设费、单位处理量运行费、COD削减比例、氨氮削减比例4个指标的评价体系,采用熵权法确定相应指标的权重,应用欧式贴近度对污水处理厂进行综合效益的客观评价。基于污水处理厂的处理水量和出水水质特征,将辽河流域的47座污水处理厂划分为4类进行评价。结果表明:在处理能力2万t/d以下、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002《污水处理厂污染物排放标准》一级A标准的污水处理厂中,A 2/O工艺优越性较为明显;在处理能力2万t/d以上、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002一级A标准的污水处理厂中,MBBR+紫外消毒工艺综合效益较高;在处理能力2万t/d以下、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002一级B标准的污水处理厂中,A 2/O工艺优越性显著;在处理能力2万t/d以上、出水水质满足GB 18918—2002一级B标准的污水处理厂中,林泡尔工艺和百乐克工艺优势非常明显。

     

    Abstract: Based on the two aspects of operation cost and environmental benefits of the sewage treatment plants (STPs), the evaluation index system with four evaluation indexes, i.e. unit construction cost, unit operation cost, COD reduction rate, ammonia nitrogen reduction rate, was constructed. Then the entropy weight method was used to determine the corresponding weight coefficient, and the Euclid approach degree applied to realize the objective evaluation of the comprehensive benefits of the STPs. Based on the treatment quantity and water quality, 47 STPs in Liaohe River Basin were divided into four groups. The results showed that the superiority of A 2/O technology was more obvious when the water quantity was under 20 000 t/d and the effluent water quality was up to Level 1A standard of GB 18918-2002, while in the process that the water quantity was above 20 000 t/d and the effluent water quality was up to Level 1A, MBBR+ UV disinfection technology showed better performance in the comprehensive benefit.When the water quality was under 20 000 t/d and the effluent quality was up to Level 1B standard, the superiority of A 2/O technology was obvious, and in the process that the water quantity was above 20 000 t/d and the effluent water quality was up to Level 1B standard,the advantages of Linpaoer technology and BIOLAK technology were obvious.

     

/

返回文章
返回