Benefit accounting analysis of sponge transformation in building and communities: taking Rose Community in Guyuan City as an example
-
摘要: 以固原市玫瑰苑小区为例,根据小区可改造绿地空间充足、雨落管断接改造难度较小等特点,提出了海绵化改造思路及工程内容,并对海绵化改造后的经济效益和生态效益进行核算。结果表明:通过海绵化改造即改造排水系统,建设下沉式绿地、植草沟、雨水花园、雨水罐、蓄水池、透水铺装等措施,可使小区综合雨量径流系数降低0.21,小区雨水径流量减少5 137.85 m 3∕a,具有良好的雨水调蓄效益;海绵化改造后具有一定的经济效益,可节约城市排水设施费用411.03元∕a,节约自来水费用4 159.20元∕a,节水效益达28 155.42元∕a;海绵化改造后可吸碳8.18 t∕a,释放氧气6.31 t∕a,吸收二氧化硫50.73 kg∕a,生态环境效益显著。Abstract: Taking Rose Community in Guyuan City as an example, the ideas and project contents of the sponge transformation were put forward according to the community characteristics such as large green space area and less difficulty in the renovation of broken rain-falling pipes, and the economic and ecological benefits after the sponge transformation were calculated. The results showed that, by means of the sponge transformation, which was to reconstruct the drainage system and construct the sinking green land, grass ditch, rainwater garden, rainwater tank, reservoir and permeable pavement, etc., the comprehensive rainfall runoff coefficient could be reduced by 0.21 and the runoff reduced by 5 137.85 m 3∕a in the residential area, thus resulting in good effect of rainwater regulation and storage. The sponge transformation had certain economic benefits, which could save the urban drainage facilities cost of 411.03 yuan∕a, the tap water cost of 4 159.20 yuan∕a, and the water-saving benefit of 28 155.42 yuan∕a. After the sponge transformation, it could absorb 8.18 t∕a of carbon, release 6.31 t∕a of oxygen and absorb 50.73 kg∕a of sulfur dioxide, resulting in significant ecological and environmental benefits.
-
[1] 章林伟 . 中国海绵城市建设与实践[J]. 给水排水, 2018,44(11):1-5. [2] 王浩, 梅超, 刘家宏 . 海绵城市系统构建模式[J]. 水利学报, 2017,48(9):1009-1022. [3] NAHB Research Center Inc . The practice of low impact development[R].Washington DC:US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, 2007. [4] 王俊岭, 聂练桃, 张雅君 , 等. 低影响开发雨洪管理技术费效分析[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2018,44(4):99-103.WANG J L, NIE L T, ZHANG Y J , et al. Analysis on cost and benefit of low impact development in storm-water management[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018,44(4):99-103. [5] 住房和城乡建设部. 海绵城市建设技术指南:低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社 2014. [6] 固原市海绵城市专项规划[R]. 原市海绵城市专项规划[R]. 北京:中国城市规划设计研究院, 2014. [7] 邓培德 . 城市雨水道设计洪峰径流系数法研究及数学模型法探讨[J]. 给水排水, 2014,40(5):108-112.DENG P D . Study on the flood-peak runoff coefficient method of urban storm water pipe design and mathematic model[J]. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 2014,40(5):108-112. [8] 龙莹洁 . 常规开发与雨水公园开发方案效益分析[J]. 城市建设理论研究(电子版), 2016(9):715. [9] 张书函, 陈建刚, 丁跃元 . 城市雨水利用的基本形式与效益分析方法[J]. 水利学报, 2007,38(增刊):399-402.ZHANG S H, CHEN J G, DING Y Y . Basic model and benefit analysis method of rainwater harvesting for utilization in urban areas[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007,38(Suppl):399-402. [10] 霍治澎, 吴小强 . 下沉式绿地和雨水回收中水利用相结合绿色建设技术在延安地区的具体应用[J]. 建筑节能, 2017(12):70-72.HUO Z P, WU X Q . Green building techniques applied in Yan’an:sunken green land and rainwater as reclaimed water[J]. Building Energy Saving, 2017(12):70-72. [11] 罗利民, 王超, 顾强生 , 等. 基于投入产出分析法的节水经济效益分析[J]. 水利经济, 2006,24(2):17-19. [12] HILLIGES R, SCHRIEWER A, HELMREICH B . A three-stage treatment system for highly polluted urban road runoff[J]. Journal of Environment Management, 2013,128:306-312. [13] BRATIERES K, FLETCHER T D, DELETIC A , et al. Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters:a large-scale design optimisation study[J]. Water Research, 2008,42(14):3930-3940. [14] 李晨, 王桂峰 . 北方城市海绵社区生态效益分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):119-124.LI C, WANG G F . Analysis on ecological benefits of sponge community in northern cities[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,37(3):119-124. [15] 韩霞 . 关于小区雨水综合利用和中水收集处理利用对于节约用水的主要作用[J]. 中华民居, 2014(5):347-348. [16] ICKSON-TAL N . Water reuse in Israel-the Dan Region Project:evalution of water quality and reliability of plant’s operation[J]. Water Science and Technology:Water Supply, 2003,3(4):231-237. [17] KANAREK A, MICHAIL M . Groundwater recharge with municipal effluent:Dan Region Reclamation Project[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1996,34(11):227-233. [18] 熊向艳, 韩永伟, 高馨婷 , 等. 北京市城乡结合部17种常用绿化植物固碳释氧功能研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2014,4(3):248-255.XIONG X Y, HAN Y W, GAO X T , et al. Analysis of carbon fixation and oxygen release capabilities of 17 afforestation plants in rural-urban fringe in Beijing[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2014,4(3):248-255. [19] 韦峰, 黄任, 陈海 , 等. 建筑小区年径流总量控制率和年SS总量去除率的计算分析[J]. 给水排水, 2018,44(3):79-81. [20] 段晓涵, 郑志宏, 赵飞 . 基于海绵城市理念的低影响开发设施应用研究[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2019(1):25-27. [21] 喻阳华, 杨苏茂 . 森林固碳释氧研究进展[J]. 环保科技, 2016,22(3):51-54.YU Y H, YANG S M . Review on carbon sequestration and oxygen release forest[J]. Environmental Protection and Technology, 2016,22(3):51-54. [22] 周小和 . 城市公共绿地建设的经济学分析[J]. 上海经济研究, 2003(9):67-72.ZHOU X H . An economic analysis of construction of public green lands in cities[J]. Shanghai Economic Review, 2003(9):67-72. [23] 徐凌 . 城市绿地生态系统综合效益研究:以大连市为例[D]. 大连:辽宁师范大学, 2003. [24] 马莹莹 . 低影响开发理念下的武汉市道路绿地效益综合评价研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2017. [25] 段艺凡 . 不同园林植物景观对大学生心理作用的影响调查研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2017.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 573
- HTML全文浏览量: 99
- PDF下载量: 112
- 被引次数: 0