湿地可恢复性评价方法及其应用——以天津滨海新区为例

吕金霞; 王文杰; 蒋卫国; 陈征; 荔琢; 邓雅文

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190091

湿地可恢复性评价方法及其应用——以天津滨海新区为例

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190091

吕金霞^1,2,
王文杰^3,4,*, ,,
蒋卫国^1,2,
陈征³,
荔琢^1,2,
邓雅文^1,2

1.
地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京师范大学地理科学学部
2.
环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京师范大学地理科学学部
3.
中国环境科学研究院
4.
生态环境部土壤与农业农村生态环境监管技术中心

详细信息

作者简介:
吕金霞(1994—),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为湿地退化风险与可恢复性评价, lvjinxia@mail.bnu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
王文杰 E-mail: wangwj@craes.org.cn

中图分类号: X171
计量
- 文章访问数: 305
- HTML全文浏览量: 74
- PDF下载量: 72
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-05-28
- 刊出日期: 2020-01-20

Methodology study on the wetland restorability evaluation and its application in Binhai New Area, Tianjin City

LÜ Jinxia^1,2,
WANG Wenjie^{3,4,*
, ,},
JIANG Weiguo^1,2,
CHEN Zheng³,
LI Zhuo^1,2,
DENG Yawen^1,2

1.
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University
2.
Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education,Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University
3.
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
4.
Technical Center for Soil, Agriculture and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment

More Information

Corresponding author: Wenjie WANG E-mail: wangwj@craes.org.cn

摘要

摘要: 通过湿地可恢复性评价可获知湿地恢复的难易程度,为湿地修复的选址与实施提供理论支撑。基于湿地类型和生态要素数据,利用湿地类型丧失区和湿地要素受损区构建了受损湿地可恢复性评价方法,定量评价湿地受损区尺度的可恢复性;借助区域内地形条件、城镇化影响和生态重要性指标,利用源-汇理论和最小累积阻力模型构建了湿地所在区域可恢复性评价方法,定量评价区域尺度的湿地可恢复性;从湿地受损区和湿地所在区域2个尺度,构建湿地自然可恢复性评价方法,并对天津滨海新区湿地可恢复性进行评价和分析。结果表明:在湿地受损区尺度,滨海新区稳定湿地区面积为640.30 km ²,在整个恢复区面积中占比最大;其次是最难恢复区,面积为381.85 km ²,占比为22.15%;最难恢复区和较难恢复区面积约占整个恢复区的42.36%。在湿地所在区域尺度,滨海新区湿地可恢复性在中等和高等安全水平下,较易恢复区面积均为1 695.65 km ²,占比为82.02%,难恢复区面积分别为67.55和129.05 km ²,占比为3.27%和6.24%。
- 湿地 /
- 遥感 /
- 可恢复性 /
- 评价 /
- 天津滨海新区
Abstract: The wetland recoverability assessment could obtain the difficulty of wetland restoration, and provide important theoretical support for the site selection and implementation of wetland restoration. Based on the wetland types and ecological element data, the assessment method for the recoverability of damaged wetland was constructed by using wetland element damaged area and wetland type loss area, which could evaluate the recoverability of damaged wetland quantitatively. Based on the topographical conditions, urbanization effects and ecological importance indicators in the region, and using the source-sink theory and the minimum cumulative resistance model, a method to evaluate the regional recoverability of wetland was constructed, which were used to quantitatively evaluate the wetland natural recoverability at the regional scale. The evaluation methods of wetland natural recoverability were proposed at damaged wetland and regional scale. Furthermore, a case study was conducted in Binhai New Area, Tianjin city. The results showed that: (1) In damaged wetland scale, the area of stable wet area in Binhai New Area was 640.30 km ², the largest proportion of the recovery area, followed by the most difficult recovery area, with an area of 381.85 km ², accounting for 22.15%. The most difficult recovery area and the more difficult recovery area were accounted for 42.36% of the entire recovery area. (2) In regional scale, under the medium and high safety level, the area of the relatively easy recovery area of Binhai New Area was1 695.65 km ², accounting for 82.02%. The area of low recovery area were 67.55 km ² and 129.05 km ², accounting for 3.27% and 6.24%, respectively.
- wetland /
- remote sensing /
- restorability /
- evaluation /
- Tianjin Binhai New Area

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	HOLLING C S . Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973,4(1):1-23.
[2]	PIMM S L . The complexity and stability of ecosystems[J]. Nature, 1984,307(5949):321-326.
[3]	王亮 . 湿地生态系统恢复研究综述[J]. 环境科学与管理,2008(8):152-156. WANG L . A review on wetland ecosystem restoration environmental science and management[J]. Environmental Science and Management,2008(8):152-156.
[4]	MAUCHAMP A, CHAUVELON P, GRILLAS P . Restoration of floodplain wetlands:opening polders along a coastal river in Mediterranean France,Vistre marshes[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2002,18(5):619-632.
[5]	颜昌宙, 范成新, 杨建华 , 等. 湖泊底泥环保疏浚技术研究展望[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2004,26(3):189-192. YAN C Z, FAN C X, YANG J H , et al. Prospect and progress of the study on environmental dredging technology of lake sediment[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2004,26(3):189-192.
[6]	刘小梅 . 河流污染治理技术在滇池河道水环境整治中的集成应用[J]. 城市道桥与防洪,2010(9):185-187. LIU X M . Integral application of river pollution treatment technology in Dianchi river water environmental treatment[J]. Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control,2010(9):185-187.
[7]	王国平, 张玉霞 . 水利工程对向海湿地水文与生态的影响[J]. 资源科学,2002(3):26-30. WANG G P, ZHANG Y X . Impacts of reservoir project on hydrological and ecological environment of Xianghai wetlands[J]. Resources Science,2002(3):26-30.
[8]	赵艳波, 刘正茂, 吕宪国 , 等. 浓江流域湿地生态水文过程恢复途径研究[J]. 水利发展研究,2008(6):20-25.
[9]	崔丽娟, 张岩, 张曼胤 , 等. 湿地水文过程效应及其调控技术[J]. 世界林业研究, 2011,24(2):10-14. CUI L J, ZHANG Y, ZHANG M Y , et al. A study of effect of wetland hydrology process and its regulation techniques[J]. World Forestry Research, 2011,24(2):10-14.
[10]	黄亮, 吴乃成, 唐涛 , 等. 水生植物对富营养化水系统中氮、磷的富集与转移[J]. 中国环境科学, 2010,30(增刊1):1-6. HUANG L, WU N C, TANG T , et al. Enrichment and removal of nutrients in eutrophic water by aquatic macrophytes[J]. China Environmental Science, 2010,30(Suppl 1):1-6.
[11]	种云霄, 胡洪营, 钱易 . 大型水生植物在水污染治理中的应用研究进展[J]. 环境污染治理技术与设备,2003(2):36-40. ZHONG Y X, HU H Y, QIAN Y . Advances in utilization of macrophytes in water pollution control[J]. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control,2003(2):36-40.
[12]	刘晶 . 上海浦东东滩鸟类栖息地生态修复区与自然退化区的水鸟群落动态变化[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2014.
[13]	何舸, 龙闹, 周文 , 等. 丹阳练湖湿地生境修复研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016,55(12):3047-3050. HE G, LONG N, ZHOU W , et al. Study on wetland habitat restoration of Lianhu,Danyang[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016,55(12):3047-3050.
[14]	李勇 . 湿地的生境修复及景观规划设计:以潍坊市白浪河湿地公园为例[J]. 中国园林, 2011,27(8):17-20. LI Y . Research on wetland habitat restoration and landscape planning:based on the Bailanghe river wetland Park of Weifang[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2011,27(8):17-20.
[15]	张杰, 熊必永 . 水环境恢复方略与水资源可持续利用[J]. 中国水利,2003(6):13-15. ZHANG J, XIONG B Y . Water environment recovery strategy and water resources sustainable utilization[J]. China Water Resources,2003(6):13-15.
[16]	陈燕飞, 张翔 . 河流水环境的可恢复性及其评价研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2016,24(1):34-46. CHEN Y F, ZHANG X . Water environment resilience and its resilient assessment of rivers[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2016,24(1):34-46.
[17]	欧阳宁雷 . 半湿润半干旱区湿地可恢复性评价方法研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2012.
[18]	胡文秋 . 基于RS 和GIS的退化湿地生态系统恢复力研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学, 2013
[19]	褚琳 . 黄河源玛曲高寒湿地生态退化与修复适宜性评价研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2012.
[20]	McFEETERS S K . The use of the normalized difference water index(NDWI) in the delineation of open water features[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1996,17(7):1425-1432.
[21]	YUAN F, BAUER M E . Comparison of impervious surface area and normalized difference vegetation index as indicators of surface urban heat island effects in Landsat imagery[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007,106(3):375-386.
[22]	LIU Y, MA W Y, YUE H, et al. Dynamic soil moisture monitoring in Shendong mining area using temperature vegetation dryness index [C]//International Conference on Remote Sensing.New York:IEEE, 2011.
[23]	陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 赵文武 . “源”“汇”景观理论及其生态学意义[J]. 生态学报, 2006,26(5):1444-1449. CHEN L D, FU B J, ZHAO W W . Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significance[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006,26(5):1444-1449.
[24]	陈阳, 岳文泽, 张亮 . 空间约束背景下海岸带湿地保护边界研究[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(3):900-908. CHEN Y, YUE W Z, ZHANG L . Mapping of wetland reserve boundary in coastal zone utilizing spatial constraints assessment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(3):900-908.
[25]	吕金霞, 蒋卫国, 王文杰 , 等. 湿地受损遥感识别方法及其在天津滨海新区的应用[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2020,10(1):1-8. LÜ J X, JIANG W G, WANG W J , et al. Wetland loss identification based on remote sensing technology and its application in Binhai New Area, Tianjin City[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2020,10(1):1-8.