留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

河流营养物基准制定方法研究进展

黄炜惠 马春子 何卓识 张含笑 霍守亮

黄炜惠, 马春子, 何卓识, 张含笑, 霍守亮. 河流营养物基准制定方法研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(1): 129-134. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200037
引用本文: 黄炜惠, 马春子, 何卓识, 张含笑, 霍守亮. 河流营养物基准制定方法研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(1): 129-134. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200037
HUANG Weihui, MA Chunzi, HE Zhuoshi, ZHANG Hanxiao, HUO Shouliang. Progress in research on river nutrient criteria development methods[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(1): 129-134. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200037
Citation: HUANG Weihui, MA Chunzi, HE Zhuoshi, ZHANG Hanxiao, HUO Shouliang. Progress in research on river nutrient criteria development methods[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11(1): 129-134. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200037

河流营养物基准制定方法研究进展

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200037
详细信息
    作者简介:

    黄炜惠(1996—),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为水环境质量演变及生态效应,huangweihui2020@163.com

    通讯作者:

    马春子 E-mail: xiaomachunzi@163.com

  • 中图分类号: X522

Progress in research on river nutrient criteria development methods

More Information
    Corresponding author: MA Chunzi E-mail: xiaomachunzi@163.com
  • 摘要: 河流营养物基准是进行河流营养状态综合评估、地表水标准修订的重要依据。系统论述了国内外河流营养物基准制定方法的最新研究进展,提出了河流营养物基准制定的程序及候选指标等,着重阐述了河流营养物基准制定的统计分析法、模型推断法和压力—响应模型法,并对河流营养物基准制定方法的发展趋势进行了展望。通过梳理和比较提出:河流营养物基准制定方法中,统计分析法中的参照河段法最能反映河流的自然状态,但使用历史河流数据和受人类干扰较小的河流数据都会造成河流的过保护,忽略气候变化等自然因素的影响会导致河流的欠保护;模型推断法需要大量数据资料构建表征水体特征的函数模型,其复杂性使该方法的应用存在较大难度;压力—响应模型是目前国内外学者研究的热点,但仍需深入探究在人类活动和气候变化影响下河流中营养物浓度与着生生物、特殊敏感种群之间的响应机制,加强营养物基准制定和河流管理需求的紧密结合。

     

  • [1] 张远, 高欣, 林佳宁, 等. 流域水生态安全评估方法[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016,29(10):1393-1399.

    ZHANG Y, GAO X, LIN J N, et al. Research on evaluation methods for riverine aquatic ecological security[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016,29(10):1393-1399.
    [2] 张远, 夏瑞, 张孟衡, 等. 水利工程背景下河流水华暴发成因分析及模拟研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017,30(8):1163-1173.

    ZHANG Y, XIA R, ZHANG M H, et al. Research progress on cause analysis and modeling of river algal blooms under background of mega water projects[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017,30(8):1163-1173.
    [3] 霍守亮, 席北斗, 陈奇, 等. 湿地营养物基准制定方法研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2012,2(3):179-183.

    HUO S L, XI B D, CHEN Q, et al. Study on development methods of wetland nutrient criteria[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2012,2(3):179-183.
    [4] CHEN J B, LI F Y, WANG Y J. Estimating the nutrient thresholds of a typical tributary in the Liao River Basin,Northeast China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018,8(1):3810.
    [5] JI X L, DAHLGREN R A, ZHANG M H. Comparison of seven water quality assessment methods for the characterization and management of highly impaired river systems[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016,188:15.
    pmid: 26643812
    [6] SEDDON E, HILL M, GREENWOOD M T, et al. The use of palaeoecological and contemporary macroinvertebrate community data to characterize riverine reference conditions[J]. River Research and Applications, 2019,35(8):1302-1313.
    [7] REID A J, CARLSON A K, CREED I F, et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity[J]. Biological Reviews, 2019,94(3):849-873.
    pmid: 30467930
    [8] MAAVARA T, CHEN Q W, van METER K, et al. River dam impacts on biogeochemical cycling[J]. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020,1:103-116.
    [9] Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual: rivers and streams[R]. Washington DC:Office of Water,US EPA, 2000.
    [10] ARTHINGTON A H, DULVY N K, GLADSTONE W, et al. Fish conservation in freshwater and marine realms:status,threats and management[J]. Aquatic Conservation:Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2016,26:838-857.
    [11] SÁNCHEZ-BAYO F, WYCKHUYS K A. Worldwide decline of the entomofauna:a review of its drivers[J]. Biological Conservation, 2019,232:8-27.
    [12] 霍守亮, 马春子, 席北斗, 等. 湖泊营养物基准研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2017,7(2):125-133.

    HUO S L, MA C Z, XI B D, et al. Progress in research on lake nutrient criteria[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2017,7(2):125-133.
    [13] STRAYER D L, DUDGEON D. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2010,29(1):344-358.
    [14] REID M A, CHILCOTT S, THOMS M C. Using palaeoecological records to disentangle the effects of multiple stressors on floodplain wetlands[J]. Journal of Paleolimnology, 2018,60(2):247-271.
    doi: 10.1007/s10933-017-0011-y
    [15] VÖRÖSMARTY C J, MCINTYRE P B, GESSNER M O, et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2010,467:555-561.
    doi: 10.1038/nature09440 pmid: 20882010
    [16] BOULEAU G, PONT D. Did you say reference conditions? ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2015,47(1):32-41.
    [17] KUJANOVÁ K, MATOUŠKOVÁ M. Identification of hydromorphological reference sites using the new REFCON method,with an application to rivers in the Czech Republic[J]. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 2017,17(3):235-245.
    [18] WIMMER R, CHOVANEC A, MOOG O, et al. Abiotic stream classification as a basis for a surveillance monitoring network in Austria in accordance with the EU Water Framework Directive[J]. Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologica, 2010,28(4):177-184.
    [19] AGRA J U M, LIGEIRO R, MACEDO D R, et al. Ecoregions and stream types help us understand ecological variability in Neotropical reference streams[J]. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2019,70(4):594-602.
    [20] KUJANOVÁ K, MATOUŠKOVÁ M, HOŠEK Z. The relationship between river types and land cover in riparian zones[J]. Limnologica, 2018,71(1):29-43.
    [21] THEODOROPOULOS C, KARAOUZAS I, VOURKA A, et al. ELF:a benthic macroinvertebrate multi-metric index for the assessment and classification of hydrological alteration in rivers[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,108(1):105713.
    [22] Using stressor-response relationships to derive numeric nutrient criteria[R]. Washington DC:Office of Water,US EPA, 2010.
    [23] HEATHERLY Ⅱ T. Acceptable nutrient concentrations in agriculturally dominant landscapes:a comparison of nutrient criteria approaches for Nebraska rivers and streams[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,45(1):355-363.
    [24] GRANADOS M, MANDRAK N E, JACKSON D A. Synthesizing reference conditions for highly degraded areas through best professional judgment[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2014,40(Suppl 2):37-42.
    [25] JOHNSON R K, HALLSTAN S. Modelling outperforms typologies for establishing reference conditions of boreal lake and stream invertebrate assemblages[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018,93(1):864-873.
    [26] LIU Z T. Water quality criteria green book of China[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2015: 23-77.
    [27] CHEN J B, LU J. Establishment of reference conditions for nutrients in an intensive agricultural watershed,Eastern China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014,21(4):2496-2505.
    pmid: 24081922
    [28] CHENG P, LI X Y. Establishing reference nutrient conditions using improved statistical methods in a river network with typical monsoon climatic pattern[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018,89:260-268.
    [29] MAKAREWICZ J C, LEWIS T W, REA E, et al. Using SWAT to determine reference nutrient conditions for small and large streams[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2015,41(1):123-135.
    [30] ULRIKE H, JUDITH M, MATHIAS G, et al. Reference conditions for rivers of the German Baltic Sea Catchment:reconstructing nutrient regimes using the model MONERIS[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2014,14(3):1123-1138.
    [31] MCLAUGHLIN D B, RECKHOW K H. A Bayesian network assessment of macroinvertebrate responses to nutrients and other factors in streams of the Eastern Corn Belt Plains,Ohio,USA[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2017,345:21-29.
    [32] QIAN S S, MILTNER R J. A continuous variable Bayesian networks model for water qualitymodeling:a case study of setting nitrogen criterion for small rivers and streams in Ohio,USA[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2015,69:14-22.
    [33] ASHTON M J, MORGAN R P, STRANKO S. Relations between macroinvertebrates,nutrients,and water quality criteria in wadeable streams of Maryland,USA[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2014,186(2):1167-1182.
    doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3447-1 pmid: 24114278
    [34] HAUSMANN S, CHARLES D F, GERRITSEN J, et al. A diatom-based biological condition gradient (BCG) approach for assessing impairment and developing nutrient criteria for streams[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,562:914-927.
    [35] ELIAS C L, CALAPEZ A R, ALMEIDA S F P, et al. Determining useful benchmarks for the bioassessment of highly disturbed areas based on diatoms[J]. Limnologica-Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 2015,51:83-93.
    [36] CHARLES D F, TUCCILLO A P, BELTON T J. Use of diatoms for developing nutrient criteria for rivers and streams:a biological condition gradient approach[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,96:258-269.
    [37] National strategy for the development of regional nutrient criteria[R]. Washington DC:Office of Water,US EPA, 1998.
    [38] LIU L N, MA C Z, HUO S L, et al. Impacts of climate change and land use on the development of nutrient criteria[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018,563:533-542.
    [39] HUO S L, HE Z S, MA C Z, et al. Stricter nutrient criteria are required to mitigate the impact of climate change on harmful cyanobacterial blooms[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019,569:698-704.
    [40] YANG N, LI Y, ZHANG W L, et al. Cascade dam impoundments restrain the trophic transfer efficiencies in benthic microbial food web[J]. Water Research, 2020,170(1):115351.
    [41] CHEN W, OLDEN J D. Designing flows to resolve human and environmental water needs in a dam-regulated river[J]. Nature Communications, 2017,8(1):2158.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02226-4 pmid: 29255194
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  554
  • HTML全文浏览量:  212
  • PDF下载量:  89
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-02-29
  • 刊出日期:  2021-01-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回