活性污泥胞外聚合物中蛋白质定量方法的评价

杨凯; 张硕; 崔康平; 黑生强; 吕学敏; 宋广清; 张弦; 黄霞

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200046

活性污泥胞外聚合物中蛋白质定量方法的评价

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200046

杨凯^1,,
张硕²,
崔康平¹,
黑生强²,
吕学敏²,
宋广清²,
张弦²,
黄霞^2,*, ,

1.
合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院
2.
环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室,清华大学环境学院

详细信息

作者简介:
杨凯(1993—),男,硕士,研究方向为膜污染机理,yangkai986155252@163.com

通讯作者:
黄霞 E-mail: xhuang@tsinghua.edu.cn

中图分类号: X703.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 883
- HTML全文浏览量: 358
- PDF下载量: 143
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-03-09
- 刊出日期: 2021-01-20

Evaluation of protein quantification methods for extracellular polymers in activated sludge

1.
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering,Hefei University of Technology
2.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University

More Information

Corresponding author: HUANG Xia E-mail: xhuang@tsinghua.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 胞外聚合物(EPS)中蛋白质的准确定量对研究活性污泥性质具有重要意义。为对EPS中蛋白质定量方法的选择提供依据,系统评价了Modified Lowry法、BCA法、Bradford法的测试性能,包括测试范围、准确度、精密度及对EPS中部分组分(Ca²⁺、Mg²⁺、还原性糖、腐殖酸)的抗干扰性。结果表明:Modified Lowry法在蛋白质浓度为1~10、10~100 mg/L时与吸光度的线性相关性较好(R²>0.99),BCA法和Bradford法的测试范围较Modified Lowry法更宽;Modified Lowry法的准确度和精密度均最高,BCA法次之,Bradford法最低;Modified Lowry法受Ca²⁺、Mg²⁺和还原性糖干扰,BCA法受还原性糖和腐殖酸干扰,Bradford法受腐殖酸的干扰。因此,EPS中蛋白质定量方法的选择应从样品性质(蛋白质浓度范围、干扰物质种类及浓度)和测试方法性能(测试范围、准确度、精密度和抗干扰性)2个方面综合考虑。
- 胞外聚合物 /
- 蛋白质定量 /
- Modified Lowry法 /
- BCA法 /
- Bradford法
Abstract: The accurate quantification of proteins in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) is of great significance for studying the properties of activated sludge. To provide a basis for the selection of protein quantification methods in EPS, the test performance of Modified Lowry method, BCA method, Bradford method was systematically evaluated, including the test range, accuracy, precision and the anti-interference of some components (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺,reducing sugar and humic acid) in EPS. The results indicated that the Modified Lowry method showed a good linear correlation between protein concentration and absorbance in the range of protein concentration of 1-10 and 10-100 mg/L (R²>0.99); and the test range of BCA method and Bradford method was wider. Modified Lowry method had the highest accuracy and precision, BCA method ranked the second, and Bradford method was the worst. Besides, Modified Lowry method was affected by Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺and reducing sugar; BCA method was affected by reducing sugar and humic acid; and Bradford method was affected by humic acid. Therefore, the choice of protein quantification method in EPS should be comprehensively considered from the two aspects of sample properties (protein content range, interference species and concentration) and test method performance (test range, accuracy, precision and anti-interference).
- extracellular polymeric substances /
- protein quantification /
- Modified Lowry method /
- BCA method /
- Bradford method

HTML全文

参考文献(29)

[1]	KAVITHA S, JAYASHREE C, ADISH K S, et al. The enhancement of anaerobic biodegradability of waste activated sludge by surfactant mediated biological pretreatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,168(3):159-166.
[2]	WANG B B, LIU X T, CHEN J M, et al. Composition and functional group characterization of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in activated sludge:the impacts of polymerization degree of proteinaceous substrates[J]. Water Research, 2018,129:133-142. pmid: 29145083
[3]	CHEN L, TIAN Y, CAO C Q, et al. Interaction energy evaluation of soluble microbial products (SMP) on different membrane surfaces:role of the reconstructed membrane topology[J]. Water Research, 2012,46(8):2693-2704. pmid: 22406287
[4]	NI B J, RITTMANN B E, YU H Q. Soluble microbial products and their implications in mixed culture biotechnology[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2011,29(9):454-463. pmid: 21632131
[5]	KUNACHEVA C, STUCKEY D C. Analytical methods for soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymers (ECP) in wastewater treatment systems:a review[J]. Water Research, 2014,61(Suppl):1-18.
[6]	ZHANG P, SHEN Y, GUO J S, et al. Extracellular protein analysis of activated sludge and their functions in wastewater treatment plant by shotgun proteomics[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:12041. doi: 10.1038/srep12041 pmid: 26160685
[7]	HOU X, LIU S, ZHANG Z. Role of extracellular polymeric substance in determining thehigh aggregation ability of anammox sludge[J]. Water Research, 2015,75:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.031 pmid: 25746962
[8]	YIN C, MENG F, CHEN G H. Spectroscopic characterization of extracellular polymeric substances from a mixed culture dominated by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria[J]. Water Research, 2015,68:740-749. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.046 pmid: 25462778
[9]	WU B, NI B J, HORVAT K, et al. Occurrence state and molecular structure analysis of extracellular proteins with implications to the dewaterability of waste activated sludge[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017,51(16):9235-9243. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02861 pmid: 28741346
[10]	FELIPE M O, LEMA J, RAMON M, et al. Role of exopolymeric protein on the settleability of nitrifying sludges[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2004,94(1):43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.11.010 pmid: 15081485
[11]	XIAO B Y, LIU Y, LUO M, et al. Evaluation of the secondary structures of protein in the extracellular polymeric substances extracted from activated sludge by different methods[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019(6):128-136.
[12]	BRADSTREET R B. Kjeldahl method for organic nitrogen[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1954,26(1):185-187.
[13]	HIRT R C. Ultraviolet spectrophotometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1956,28(4):579-583.
[14]	GORNALL A G, BARDWILL C J, DAVID M N. Determination of serum protein by means of the Biuret reaction[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1949,177:751-766.
[15]	FRØLUND B, GRIEBE T, NIELSEN P H. Enzymatic-activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1995,43(4):755-761. doi: 10.1007/BF00164784 pmid: 7546613
[16]	LOWRY O H, ROSEBROUGH N J, FARR A L, et al. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1951,193(1):265-275.
[17]	SMITH P K, KROHN R I, HERMANSON G T. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1985,163(1):76-85.
[18]	BRANFORD M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976,72(1/2):248-254.
[19]	YUAN H X, QIN F, GUO W Q, et al. Oxidative stress and spermatogenesis suppression in the testis of cadmium-treated Bombyx mori larvae[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015,23(6):5763-5770. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5818-3 pmid: 26585454
[20]	DONG Q, PARKER W, DAGNEW M. Impact of FeCl₃,dosing on AnMBR treatment of municipal wastewater[J]. Water Research, 2015,80:281-293. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.025 pmid: 26005788
[21]	KASZYCKI P, DUBICKA-LISOWSKA A, AUGUSTYNOWICZ J, et al. Callitriche cophocarpa (water starwort) proteome under chromate stress:evidence for induction of a quinone reductase[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018,25(10):1-15.
[22]	SHEN Y X, XIAO K, LIANG P, et al. Improvement on the modified Lowry method against interference of divalent cations in soluble protein measurement[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013,97(9):4167-4178. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4783-3 pmid: 23474613
[23]	FELZ S, VERMEULEN P, van LOOSDRECHT M C M, et al. Chemical characterization methods for the analysis of structural extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)[J]. Water Research, 2019,157(15):201-208.
[24]	LE C C, KUNACHEVA C, STUCKEY D C. “Protein” measurement in biological wastewater treatment systems:a critical evaluation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016,50(6):3074-3081. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05261 pmid: 26893149
[25]	MORENO M R D, SMITH J F, SMITH R V. Mechanism studies of coomassie blue and silver staining of proteins[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2010,75(9):907-911. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600750919 pmid: 2431134
[26]	HENRIST C, MATHIEU J P, VOGELS C, et al. Morphological study of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles precipitated in dilute aqueous solution[J]. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2003,249(1/2):321-330.
[27]	LÜ J, QIU L, QU B. Controlled growth of three morphological structures of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles by wet precipitation method[J]. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2004,267(3/4):676-684.
[28]	WAFFENSCHMIDT S, JAENICKE L. Assay of reducing sugars in the nanomole range with 2,2’-bicinchoninate[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 1987,165(2):337-340. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90278-8 pmid: 3425902
[29]	刘新超, 李俊, 谢丽, 等. 腐殖酸表征方法研究进展[J]. 净水技术, 2009,28(3):6-9.