Effects of land-use change on ecosystem service values in Xiong’an New Area from 1995 to 2019
-
摘要: 在对城市化可持续发展的研究中,城市生态系统服务价值(ecosystem service value,ESV)的时空研究具有重要意义。以雄安新区为例,基于1995年、2005年、2015年、2019年4期遥感影像,采用土地动态度、价值当量因子等方法对雄安新区土地利用变化及ESV进行分析。结果表明:1995—2019年,雄安新区耕地、建设用地变化较大,其面积占比分别从1995的70.55%和10.29%变为2019年的62.80%和20.30%;林地、水域、草地的面积占比较小,但变化幅度较剧烈。1995—2015年,研究区ESV减少了19.17亿元,总体呈下降趋势;2015—2019年呈上升趋势。空间上,雄安新区ESV较高的湿地生态系统面积呈先减少后逐渐增加的趋势,与总体ESV变化趋势一致。雄安新区ESV变化的最主要驱动因素是水域,在未来的城市化进程中,需要更加注重白洋淀的保护,促进生态-经济-社会的协调可持续发展。Abstract: In the study of sustainable development of urbanization, the spatiotemporal study of urban ecosystem service values (ESV) is of great significance. Taking Xiong’an New Area as an example, based on four remote sensing images from 1995 to 2019, the land use dynamics and the ESV of Xiong’an New Area were analyzed by using land dynamic degree and value equivalent factor. The results showed that: the cultivated land and construction land in Xiong’an New Area changed greatly from 1995 to 2019, and their proportions changed from 70.55% and 10.29% in 1995 to 62.80% and 20.30% in 2019, respectively; the proportion of woodland, waters and grassland was relatively small, but the range of changing was more dramatic. From 1995 to 2015, the ESV in the study area showed a decreasing trend, with a decrease of 1.917 billion yuan, and an increasing trend from 2015 to 2019. Spatially, the area of wetland ecosystems with higher ESV in Xiong’an New Area showed a trend of decreasing first and then gradually increasing, which was consistent with the ESV trend of Xiong’an New Area. In general, the main driving factor for the changing of ESV in Xiong’an New Area was water area. In the future urbanization process, Xiong’an New Area should pay more attention to the protection of Baiyangdian Lake and promote the coordinated and sustainable development of ecology-economic-society.
-
Key words:
- land use change /
- ecosystem service value /
- Xiong’an New Area
-
[1] MOONEY H A, DURAIAPPAH A, LARIGAUDERIE A. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013,110(Suppl 1):3665-3672. [2] 房学宁, 赵文武. 生态系统服务研究进展:2013年第11届国际生态学大会(INTECOL Congress)会议述评[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(20):6736-6740.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201310122451[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being:current state and trends[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005: 77-101. [4] 张立伟, 傅伯杰. 生态系统服务制图研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(2):316-325.ZHANG L W, FU B J. The progress in ecosystem services mapping:a review[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(2):316-325. [5] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999,19(5):607-613.OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K, MIAO H. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999,19(5):607-613. [6] 王军, 顿耀龙. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015,24(5):798-808.WANG J, DUN Y L. A review on the effects of land use change on ecosystem services[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015,24(5):798-808. [7] 张天海, 田野, 徐舒, 等. 滨海城市土地利用格局演变及对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(21):7572-7581.ZHANG T H, TIAN Y, XU S, et al. The evolvement of land use patterns in coastal cities and its influence on ecosystem service values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(21):7572-7581. [8] DARVILL R, LINDO Z. The inclusion of stakeholders and cultural ecosystem service in land management trade-off decisions using an ecosyetem services appproch[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2016,31(3):533-545. [9] SCHUCH G, SERRAO-NEUMANN S, MORGAN E, et al. Water in the city:green open spaces,land use planning and flood management:an Australian case study[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017,63:539-550. [10] BRAHMA B, PATHAK K, LAL R, et al. Ecosystem carbon sequestration through restoration of of degraded lands in Northeast India[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018,29(1):15-25. [11] TOLESSA T, SENBETA F, KIDANE M. The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017,23:47-54. [12] HILL M J, BIGGS J, THORNHILL I, et al. Urban ponds as an aquatic biodiversity resource in modified landscapes[J]. Globa Change Biology, 2016,23(3):986-999. [13] 高奇, 师学义, 黄勤, 等. 区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(增刊2):308-312.GAO Q, SHI X Y, HUANG Q, et al. Ecosystem service value respond to regional land use change[J]. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2013,23(Suppl 2):308-312. [14] COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, de GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260. [15] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008,23(5):911-919.XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919. [16] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unitarea[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(8):1243-1254. [17] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003,18(2):189-196.XIE G D, LU C X, LENG Y F, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003,18(2):189-196. [18] 傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014,33(4):441-446.FU B J, ZHANG L W. Land-use change and ecosystem services:concepts,methods and progress[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014,33(4):441-446. [19] 石龙宇, 崔胜辉, 尹锴, 等. 厦门市土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2010,65(6):708-714.SHI L Y, CUI S H, YIN K, et al. The impact of land use/cover change on ecosystem service in Xiamen[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(6):708-714. [20] 冯异星, 罗格平, 鲁蕾, 等. 土地利用变化对干旱区典型流域生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009,23(6):247-251.FENG Y X, LUO G P, LU L, et al. Impacts of land use changes on ecosystem services value in typical river basin of arid area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009,23(6):247-251. [21] 李屹峰, 罗跃初, 刘纲, 等. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响:以密云水库流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(3):726-736.LI Y F, LUO Y C, LIU G, et al. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services,a case study in Miyun Reservoir watershed[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(3):726-736. [22] 叶振宇, 王之禹. 河北雄安新区实现国家战略的优势条件、问题挑战与应对之策[J]. 城市, 2018(2):3-8. [23] 国务院关于河北雄安新区总体规划(2018—2035年)的批复:国〔2018〕159号[A/OL]. (2019-01-02)[2019-12-24]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-01/02/content_5354222.htm. [24] 朱会义, 李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J]. 地理学报, 2003,58(5):643-650.ZHU H Y, LI X B. Discussion on the index method of regional land use change[J]. Acta Geogrphica Sinca, 2003,58(5):643-650. [25] 陈明叶, 刘素红, 于连海, 等. 大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值相应研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(8):1376-1389.CHEN M Y, LIU S H, YU L H, et al. Response of ecosystem service value to ecosystem structure change in Fuping Basin of the Daqinghe River[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018,33(8):1376-1389. [26] 王凯霖, 李海涛, 吴爱民, 等. 人工补水条件下白洋淀湿地演变研究[J]. 地球学报, 2019,39(5):549-558.WANG K L, LI H T, WU A M, et al. An analysis of the evolution of Baiyangdian wetlands in Hebei Province with artificial recharge[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2019,39(5):549-558. [27] 马远. 雄安新区城市森林建设的经验和启示[J]. 林业与生态, 2019(6):23-25. [28] 李晓赛, 朱永明, 赵丽, 等. 基于价值系数动态调整的青龙县生态系统服务价值变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23(3):373-381.LI X S, ZHU Y M, ZHAO L, et al. Ecosystem services value change in Qinglong County from dynamically adjusted value coefficients[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015,23(3):373-381. [29] 王晨绯. 生态系统服务:搭建人与自然的桥梁[N]. 中国科学报, 2017-02-27(5). [30] 环境保护部, 中国科学院. 全国生态环境十年变化(2000—2010年)遥感调查与评估[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019. [31] 朱金峰, 周艺, 王世新, 等. 1975—2018年白洋淀湿地变化分析[J]. 遥感学报, 2019,23(5):971-986.ZHU J F, ZHOU Y, WANG S X, et al. Analysis of changes of Baiyangdian wetland from 1975 to 2018 based on remote sensing[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2019,23(5):971-986.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 687
- HTML全文浏览量: 268
- PDF下载量: 75
- 被引次数: 0