-
摘要: 为探索呼伦湖流域沙化严重的斑块状区域生态修复的治理模式,研发设计条形孔2.0 m高度(Ⅰ)、条形孔1.5 m高度(Ⅱ)、条形孔1.0 m高度(Ⅲ)、方形孔1.0 m高度(Ⅳ)和圆形孔1.0 m高度(Ⅴ)5种类型的可移动挡风墙作为沙障,并对其防风效能进行对比研究,明确挡风墙背风侧不同距离、距地表不同高度的风速及表层土壤含水量特征,为大风频发地区的挡风墙设置提供参考依据。结果表明:5种挡风墙均可在有限距离内降低风速,且距地表0.5 m高度处的防风效能均优于1.0 m高度处;其中在挡风墙背风侧1 m、距地表0.5 m高度处,防风效能为挡风墙Ⅴ(87.30%)>Ⅰ(83.91%)>Ⅱ(83.29%)>Ⅳ(80.20%)>Ⅲ(74.66%),表层土壤保水能力为挡风墙Ⅴ>Ⅰ>Ⅱ>Ⅳ>Ⅲ,制作成本为挡风墙Ⅰ>Ⅱ>Ⅴ>Ⅳ>Ⅲ。较适宜呼伦湖流域环境的挡风墙结构参数:1.5 m高,条形孔;1.0 m高,圆形孔。Abstract: The grassland desertification is serious in Hulun Lake Basin. 5 different heights and hole types of movable wind-break walls (Ⅰ:2.0 m high, stripe-shaped holes, Ⅱ:1.5 m high, stripe-shaped holes, Ⅲ:1.0 m high, stripe-shaped holes, Ⅳ:1.0 m high, square holes, Ⅴ:1.0 m high, circular holes) were developed and designed as sand barriers in order to explore the ecological restoration modes in serious desertification patches. The windbreak effects of wind-break walls were compared and the characteristics of wind speed at different distances and heights from the surface and surface soil moisture content behind them were determined, which could provide references for the installation of wind-break walls in areas with frequent winds. The results showed that, all wind-break walls could reduce the wind speed within limit distance and the windbreak effect at 0.5 m from the surface were higher than that at 1.0 m. At the distance of 1 m behind the wind-break walls and the height of 0.5 m from the surface, the windbreak effects were Ⅴ(87.30%)>Ⅰ(83.91%)>Ⅱ(83.29%)>Ⅳ(80.20%)>Ⅲ(74.66%). The order of water holding capacity of surface soil was Ⅴ>Ⅰ>Ⅱ>Ⅳ>Ⅲ and the cost of them was Ⅰ>Ⅱ>Ⅴ>Ⅳ>Ⅲ. Therefore, the structural parameters of the wind-break walls that were more suitable for Hulun Lake Basin were as follows: 1.5 m high, stripe-shaped holes; 1.0 m high, circular holes.
-
Key words:
- wind-break wall /
- windbreak effect /
- upright sand barrier /
- Hulunbeier sandy land
-
[1] 郭瑞霞, 管晓丹, 张艳婷. 我国荒漠化主要研究进展[J]. 干旱气象, 2015, 33(3):505-513.GUO R X, GUAN X D, ZHANG Y T. Main advances in desertification research in China[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2015, 33(3):505-513. [2] 王涛, 朱震达. 我国沙漠化研究的若干问题:1.沙漠化的概念及其内涵[J]. 中国沙漠, 2003, 23(3):209-214.WANG T, ZHU Z D. Study on sandy desertification in China:1.definition of sandy desertification and its connotation[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2003, 23(3):209-214. [3] 杨伟超. 生态修复中不同类型沙障防风固沙效应研究[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2017. [4] XIE Y H, DANG X H, ZHOU Y J, et al. Using sediment grain size characteristics to assess effectiveness of mechanical sand barriers in reducing erosion[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10:1429-1439.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58097-1[5] LIU L, BO T L. Effects of checkerboard sand barrier belt on sand transport and dune advance[J]. Aeolian Research, 2020, 42:100546.
doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2019.100546[6] NING B Y, MA J X, JIANG Z D, et al. Evolution characteristics and development trends of sand barriers[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017, 8(4):398-404.
doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.04.012[7] 李红悦, 哈斯额尔敦. 机械沙障固沙效应及生态效应的研究综述[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 56(1):63-67.LI H Y, HASI E D. Sand-fixing effect and ecological effect of mechanical sand barriers:a review[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2020, 56(1):63-67. [8] 由海忠. 浅谈防沙治沙工程的重要意义[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2018, 41(1):1-2. [9] 程弘毅. 干旱沙漠自然保护区社会服务功能研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2017. [10] 马学喜, 王海峰, 李生宇, 等. 两种固沙方格沙障的防护效益及地形适应性对比[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(2):344-349.MA X X, WANG H F, LI S Y, et al. Comparison of sand-protecting efficiency and terrain adapted of two checkerboard barriers[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2):344-349. [11] LIAO C R, LIU B C, XU Y N, et al. Effect of topography and protecting barriers on revegetation of sandy land,Southern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9:6501.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43034-8[12] 肖巍, 乔保军, 范海朋. 乌兰布和沙漠东北部麦草沙障防风固沙效果研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(14):106-109. [13] 袁立敏. 模块沙障的构建及其防护效益研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2014. [14] 李海英, 张泽, 姬爱民, 等. 生物质灰结渣和腐蚀特性[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2017, 7(1):107-113.LI H Y, ZHANG Z, JI A M, et al. Behavior of slagging and corrosion of biomass ash[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2017, 7(1):107-113. [15] LI X R, XIAO H L, HE M Z, et al. Sand barriers of straw checkerboards for habitat restoration in extremely arid desert regions[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2006, 28(2):149-157.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.05.020[16] 周丹丹. 生物可降解聚乳酸(PLA)材料在防沙治沙中的应用研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2009. [17] PAN X, WANG Z Y, GAO Y. Effects of compound sand barrier for habitat restoration on sediment grain-size distribution in ulan buh desert[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):2566.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59538-7[18] 柴玉生, 张琪, 赵宗阁, 等. 一种风沙危害治理新方法的建立[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2008, 34(1):61-64.CHAI Y S, ZHANG Q, ZHAO Z G, et al. A new method of controlling wind-drift sand disaster[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2008, 34(1):61-64. [19] 罗国才. 青藏铁路错那湖段插板式高立式沙障防风固沙效果研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018. [20] 韩峰, 石龙, 李凯崇. 风沙流对兰新高铁挡风墙的响应规律[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2019, 40(5):9-15.HAN F, SHI L, LI K C. Response law of wind-sand flow to windbreak wall along Lanzhou-Xinjiang high speed railway[J]. China Railway Science, 2019, 40(5):9-15. [21] 张广丰, 高志伟. 高速铁路特殊地形地貌段路基防风措施研究应用[J]. 高速铁路技术, 2020, 11(3):32-36.ZHANG G F, GAO Z W. Research on anti-wind measures for sections with special terrain and physiognomy of high-speed railway[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2020, 11(3):32-36. [22] 潘新民, 马秀清, 徐洁. 兰新高铁挡风墙防风效果分析评估[J]. 干旱气象, 2019, 37(3):496-499.PAN X M, MA X Q, XU J. Analysis and evaluation about anti-wind efficiency of windbreak experimental section in Lan-Xin high railway[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2019, 37(3):496-499. [23] 孙园. 沙漠公路风沙流特征及防风挡沙墙研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2014. [24] CHENG J J, LEI J Q, LI S Y, et al. Disturbance of the inclined inserting-type sand fence to wind-sand flow fields and its sand control characteristics[J]. Aeolian Research, 2016, 21:139-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.04.008[25] 孙华杰, 臧淑英, 孙德尧, 等. 呼伦湖沉积物粒度特征及其环境指示意义[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(9):1570-1578.SUN H J, ZANG S Y, SUN D Y, et al. Grain-size characteristics and their environmental significance of Hulun Lake sediments[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(9):1570-1578. [26] 冯宇, 王文杰, 刘军会, 等. 呼伦贝尔草原生态功能区防风固沙功能重要性主要影响因子时空变化特征[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2013, 3(3):220-230.FENG Y, WANG W J, LIU J H, et al. Spatial and temporal variation of main impact factors and importance of wind break and sand-fixing function in Hulun Buir grassland eco-function area[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2013, 3(3):220-230. [27] 赵新华. 呼伦湖周边地区沙化土地现状及防治对策[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2018, 41(5):1-2.ZHAO X H. Present situation of desertificated land around Hulun Lake and control measures[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design, 2018, 41(5):1-2. [28] 向开馥. 防护林学[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社, 1991: 19. [29] 张克存, 张伟民, 屈建军, 等. 不同砾石盖度戈壁床面动力学特征研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(6):1077-1082.ZHANG K C, ZHANG W M, QU J J, et al. Study on dynamic properties of gobi surface with different gravel coverage[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2012, 29(6):1077-1082. [30] 何志辉, 李生宇, 王海峰, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠4种结构尼龙阻沙网的防风阻沙效益对比[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(2):369-374.HE Z H, LI S Y, WANG H F, et al. Comparison of wind prevention and sand blocking effects of 4 types of sand blocking nylon nets in the central Taklimakan desert[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2014, 31(2):369-374. [31] 彭婉月, 王兆云, 李海东, 等. 黑河中下游防风固沙功能时空变化及影响因子分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(12):2734-2744.PENG W Y, WANG Z Y, LI H D, et al. Spatio-temporal changes of sand-fixing function and its driving forces in the middle and lower reaches of Heihe River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(12):2734-2744. [32] 邹苗. 4种沙障对毛乌素沙地流沙环境的影响研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2019. [33] 李凯崇, 周沁, 丁录胜, 等. 南疆戈壁区HDPE板沙障风沙防护机理及效果评价[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2019, 40(3):10-14.LI K C, ZHOU Q, DING L S, et al. Prevention mechanism and effect evaluation of HDPE sand barrier in Gobi area of southern Xinjiang[J]. China Railway Science, 2019, 40(3):10-14. [34] 武俊瑛, 高永. 浑善达克沙地公路机械沙障防风固沙效益分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2010, 24(12):161-166.WU J Y, GAO Y. Analysis on the sand-barrier-belt benefit for highway in Otindag Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2010, 24(12):161-166.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 484
- HTML全文浏览量: 156
- PDF下载量: 33
- 被引次数: 0