Research on water pollution control technology assessment in zinc smelting industry based on AHP-FCE
-
摘要: 通过构建锌冶炼行业水污染控制技术评价指标体系,结合层次分析-模糊综合评价(AHP-FCE)法,分别对污酸及酸性废水、综合废水2类废水建立锌冶炼行业水污染控制技术评价标准,对2类废水的8种污染控制技术进行综合量化评价。结果表明:基于选择性吸附—气液强化硫化—蒸发浓缩—氟氯分离的污酸资源化处理关键技术综合评价得分为4.38,为评价的4种污酸及酸性废水污染控制技术中最优的;基于重金属废水生物制剂深度处理技术的重金属冶炼废水生物-物化组合处理与回用技术综合评价得分为4.14,为评价的4种综合废水处理与回用技术中最优的。该评价结果可为企业选择适宜水污染控制技术提供可靠依据,也可为管理部门推荐最佳可行性技术及制订相关政策标准提供强有力的支撑。Abstract: The evaluation index system of water pollution control technology of zinc smelting industry was constructed, the analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (AHP-FCE) model was developed, and the evaluation standards of water pollution control technology of zinc smelting industry were established in two technical units: the complete set of pollution control technology for waste acid and acid wastewater and the complete set of comprehensive wastewater treatment and reuse technology. Then the comprehensive quantitative evaluation of eight pollution control technologies in two technical units was carried out based on AHP-FCE. The results showed that: The comprehensive evaluation score of the key technology of waste acid resource treatment based on “selective adsorption-gas-liquid enhanced sulphidation-evaporation concentration-fluorine chlorine separation” was 4.38, which was the best of the four waste acid and acid wastewater pollution control technologies; the comprehensive evaluation score of the heavy metal smelting wastewater biophysical and chemical combination treatment and reuse technology based on “biological agent advanced treatment technology of heavy metal wastewater” was 4.14, which was the best of the four comprehensive wastewater treatment technologies. The evaluation results couldprovide a reliable basis for enterprises to choose suitable water pollution control technology, and also provide a strong support for the management department to recommend the best feasible technology and formulate relevant policies and standards.
-
-
[1] 任岩军, 张铮, 何京东, 等. 我国燃煤电厂大气汞控制技术综合评估与对策探讨[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(4):841-848. REN Y J, ZHANG Z, HE J D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and countermeasures of atmospheric mercury pollution control technology in coal-fired power plants[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(4):841-848.
[2] 李梁, 曹欣然, 庞燕, 等. 洱海流域农村生活污水治理技术评价[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019, 9(4):349-354. LI L, CAO X R, PANG Y, et al. Evaluation of rural domestic wastewater treatment technologies in Lake Erhai Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4):349-354.
[3] XU G, YANG Y P, LU S Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of coal-fired power plants based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(5):2343-2351.
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.054[4] CHEN T, SHEN D S, JIN Y Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of environ-economic benefits of anaerobic digestion technology in an integrated food waste-based methane plant using a fuzzy mathematical model[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 208:666-677.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.082[5] SCHNEIDER P J, EVANIEW N, MCKAY P, et al. Moving forward through consensus:a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in orthopaedic oncology[J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2017, 475(12):3044-3055.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5482-7[6] LIM D J. Technology forecasting using DEA in the presence of infeasibility[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2018, 25(5):1695-1706.
doi: 10.1111/itor.2018.25.issue-5[7] 陈欢哲. 新乡市化工行业大气污染物控制技术与成本效益评估研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2019. [8] PU H X, LUO K L, ZHANG S X. Risk assessment model for different foodstuff drying methods via AHP-FCE method:a case study of “coal-burning” fluorosis area of Yunan and Guizhou Province,China[J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 263:74-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.123[9] SHAO L N, CHEN G Q. Evaluation of heavy metal pollution prevention technology based on AHP-FCE[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Biological Engineering and Pharmacy(BEP 2016). Paris: Atlantis Press, 2016:223-226.
[10] 姜河, 周建飞, 廖学品, 等. 牛皮制革过程污染控制技术评估模型的建立与实证[J]. 中国皮革, 2018, 47(11):40-47. JIANG H, ZHOU J F, LIAO X P, et al. Evaluation method development and case analysis of pollution control technologies for cowhide leather manufacturing process[J]. China Leather, 2018, 47(11):40-47.
[11] 牟桂芹, 隋立华, 郭亚逢, 等. 石化行业炼油恶臭污染源治理技术评估[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(12):4771-4778. MU G Q, SUI L H, GUO Y F, et al. Evaluation of treatment technology of odor pollution source in petrochemical industry[J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(12):4771-4778.
[12] 梁静芳. 制药行业水污染防治技术评估方法研究[D]. 石家庄:河北科技大学, 2010. [13] 王谦. 电镀行业六价铬污染防治最佳可行技术评估的研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2013. [14] 田亚静, 姜晨, 吴广龙, 等. 再生铜冶炼过程多氯萘与二噁英类排放特征分析与控制技术评估[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(12):4682-4689. TIAN Y J, JIANG C, WU G L, et al. Assessment of emission and co-reduction of PCDD/Fs and PCNs in the secondary copper production sector[J]. Environmental Science, 2015, 36(12):4682-4689.
[15] 李旭华, 周长波, 朱宁芳, 等. 电解锰行业污染治理技术评估研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2013, 3(6):514-518. LI X H, ZHOU C B, ZHU N F, et al. Evaluation of the technologies for EMM industry pollution control[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2013, 3(6):514-518.
[16] 曲久辉, 杨中超, 刘锐平, 等. 一种高浓度含砷酸性废水处理方法及装置:CN103253791A[P]. 2013-08-21. [17] 环境保护部. 铅冶炼污染防治最佳可行技术指南(试行)[A/OL].(2012-01-17)[2021-03-08]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201201/t20120120_222827.htm. [18] 柴立元, 王庆伟, 蒋国民, 等. 污酸资源回收与深度处理方法及装置:CN105439355A[P]. 2016-03-30. [19] 环境保护部. 铅锌冶炼工业污染防治技术政策[A/OL].(2012-03-07)[2021-03-08]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/wrfzjszc/201203/t20120319_224788.htm. [20] 邓国屏, 王化敏. 重金属废水生物制剂深度处理与回用技术在锌冶炼废水处理中的运用[J]. 青海环境, 2013, 23(1):18-20. [21] 李艳萍, 乔琦, 柴发合, 等. 基于层次分析法的工业园区环境风险评价指标权重分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2014, 27(3):334-340. LI Y P, QIAO Q, CHAI F H, et al. Study on environmental risk assessment index weight of industrial park based on the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(3):334-340.
-
期刊类型引用(14)
1. 王雪宁，万丹丹. 基于层次分析—模糊综合评价法的医学高校实验室安全评价体系的研究. 实验室检测. 2024(04): 69-72 . 
百度学术
2. 孙叶，黄乾，王薇，徐征和，姜瑶，薛雁. 设施农业雨水集蓄利用方案综合评价方法研究. 农学学报. 2024(06): 72-82 . 百度学术
3. 王上，米江川，陈明涛，宋丹，张乔，师晖军，李超. 汉江地区内河桥梁桩基冲刷损伤评价指标体系研究. 路基工程. 2024(05): 44-50 . 百度学术
4. 孙佳. 基于模糊综合评价模型的水库综合效益评价研究. 水利科技与经济. 2024(10): 88-93 . 百度学术
5. 李中杰，汪艳如，李宗逊. 基于AHP-FCE的生态环境损害赔偿制度实施成效评估研究——以昆明市为例. 环境保护科学. 2023(01): 63-68 . 百度学术
6. 王爽. 太子河辽阳段水体污染时空变化特征研究. 黑龙江水利科技. 2023(11): 29-32 . 百度学术
7. 台辉，王苹，江宁，张茂林，徐聪，杨振奇. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的生产建设项目水土保持效果研究. 水土保持通报. 2023(05): 169-175 . 百度学术
8. 董怡华，张雪莹，张新月，李亮. 基于层次分析-模糊综合评价法的辽河流域农田面源污染治理技术评价. 环境工程. 2023(12): 150-157 . 百度学术
9. 王天枢，戚作秋，王成凯，刘精精，李利. 基于AHP-FCE的特种设备安全信用研究. 中国设备工程. 2022(07): 74-77 . 百度学术
10. 史菲菲，王雯，但智钢，姚扬，苑雯，尹姝，方琳. 基于AHP-FCE的电解锰行业废水全过程控制技术评估. 有色金属(冶炼部分). 2022(07): 109-116+121 . 百度学术
11. 王俊岭，熊玉华，张现国，邓玉莲. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的城市排水管网状态和运行效能评价——以淮安市淮安区为例. 环境工程技术学报. 2022(04): 1162-1169 . 本站查看
12. 司念朋，肖海清，李焘，宗艺晶，郭兴洲，王宏伟. 基于AHP-FCE的电子电气产品可再生ABS能效评估模型构建. 质量安全与检验检测. 2022(03): 107-110 . 百度学术
13. 解蕾，姚扬，但智钢，史菲菲，袁殷，方琳，苑雯. 基于DPSIR模型的省域绿色发展绩效评价. 环境工程技术学报. 2022(05): 1681-1686 . 本站查看
14. 王程，敬小兰，李敏，段建宏，董星佑. 2016—2021年黄土高原马莲河干流水质时空变化特征及其成因. 水土保持通报. 2022(05): 158-164 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(9)
计量
- 文章访问数: 957
- HTML全文浏览量: 656
- PDF下载量: 55
- 被引次数: 23
下载:
