Effect of optimizing operation of primary sedimentation tank on nitrogen and phosphorus removal of modified A2/O process
-
摘要: 采用改良型A2/O工艺处理城市污水,设置6种工况,即原水进入初沉池与超越初沉池直接进入生物池流量分配比分别为10∶0、8∶2、6∶4、4∶6、2∶8、0∶10,在具体工程实例中考察初沉池优化运行对脱氮除磷效果的影响。结果表明:初沉池的优化运行对出水总氮浓度和生物除磷率具有显著影响,而对出水氨氮浓度影响较小。工艺中存在反硝化除磷现象,且反硝化除磷率与原水超越初沉池直接进入生物池流量分配比呈正相关。基于6种工况,较为优化的原水进入初沉池与超越初沉池直接进入生物池流量分配比为6∶4。该工况后期出水总氮平均浓度为8.79 mg/L,较原工况降低了33.9%,氨氮浓度低于0.5 mg/L,好氧区总磷平均浓度为0.34 mg/L,满足GB 18918—2002《城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准》一级A排放标准;电耗为0.337 kW·h/m3,仅比原工况上涨了5.31%,涨幅较小。相比于原工况,虽然电耗出现了轻微上涨,但出水水质可控性得到了进一步强化,且显著优于一级A排放标准。Abstract: The modified A2/O process was used to treat urban sewage, and the effect of optimized operation of primary sedimentation tank (PST) on nitrogen and phosphorus removal were investigated in the specific engineering example. Six different operation conditions were adopted in the test, namely, the flow distribution ratio of raw water entering PST to that directly entering the biological tank stepping over PST were 10∶0, 8∶2, 6∶4, 4∶6, 2∶8 and 0∶10, respectively. The results showed that the optimized operation of PST had significant influence on the concentration of total nitrogen in the effluent and the efficiency of biological phosphorus removal, but had little influence on the ammonia nitrogen concentration. The phenomenon of denitrifying phosphorus removal existed in the experimental process, and the denitrifying phosphorus removal rate was positively related to the flow distribution ratio of raw water stepping over PGT directly entering the biological tank. Among the six different conditions, the more optimal flow distribution ratio of raw water entering PST to that directly entering the biological tank stepping over PST was 6:4. In the later stage of this condition, the average concentration of total nitrogen in the effluent was 8.79 mg/L, which was 33.9% lower than the original condition; the concentration of ammonia nitrogen was lower than 0.50 mg/L, and the average concentration of total phosphorus in aerobic area was 0.34 mg/L, which met the first level A standard of Discharge Standard of Pollutants for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant (GB 18918-2002); the power consumption was 0.337 kW·h/m3, which was only 5.31% higher than the original operation condition, with a small increase. Compared with the original condition, although the power consumption slightly increased, the controllability of the effluent water quality was further strengthened, and it was significantly better than the discharge standard of the first level A.
-
[1] HE Q L, SONG Q, ZHANG S L, et al. Simultaneous nitrification,denitrification and phosphorus removal in an aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor with mixed carbon sources:reactor performance,extracellular polymeric substances and microbial successions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 331:841-849.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.060[2] 郭晓娅, 年跃刚, 闫海红, 等. 以玉米淀粉废水为反硝化碳源的污染物降解特征与微生物群落结构研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2016, 6(5):427-433.GUO X Y, NIAN Y G, YAN H H, et al. Pollutants degradation characteristics and microbial community structure using cornstarch wastewater as denitrification carbon source[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2016, 6(5):427-433. [3] 赵蓉, 郑涛, 孙晨, 等. 沈阳得利满AO工艺升级为改良A2O工艺的可行性研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2016, 6(6):547-552.ZHAO R, ZHENG T, SUN C, et al. Feasibility study on modified A2O process to upgrade and reconstruct Shenyang degremont anoxic oxic process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2016, 6(6):547-552. [4] BU F, HU X, XIE L, et al. Cassava stillage and its anaerobic fermentation liquid as external carbon sources in biological nutrient removal[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Science B, 2015, 16(4):304-316.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400106[5] XIE J Y, GUO Y, LI Y F. The role of external carbon sources at each stage of an A2/O process for simultaneously removing nitrogen and phosphorus[J]. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2018, 37(6):2010-2015. [6] 常洋, 王彤, 王海燕, 等. 芦苇碳源-表面流人工湿地对农田退水脱氮的长期效能研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2016, 6(5):453-461.CHANG Y, WANG T, WANG H Y, et al. The long-term nitrogen removal efficiency from agricultural runoff in phragmites australis packed surface flow constructed wetland[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2016, 6(5):453-461. [7] 马玉霞, 谭蕾蕾, 沈志强, 等. Ca(OH)2预处理的秸秆作为固体碳源的反硝化性能[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2017, 7(2):46-52.MA Y X, TAN L L, SHEN Z Q, et al. Study on denitrification performance using calcium hydroxide pretreated straw as solid carbon source[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2017, 7(2):46-52. [8] 李易寰, 奚蕾蕾, 钟奕杰, 等. 倒置A2/O工艺运行效果及优化控制方案[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(3):76-81.LI Y H, XI L L, ZHONG Y J, et al. Operation effect and control scheme optimization of an inverted A2/O process[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2020, 38(3):76-81. [9] HU X, SOBOTKA D, CZERWIONKA K, et al. Effects of different external carbon sources and electron acceptors on interactions between denitrification and phosphorus removal in biological nutrient removal processes[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Science B, 2018, 19(4):305-316.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1700064[10] 黄庆涛, 宋秀兰. 外加碳源对AOA-SBR工艺脱氮除磷效果的影响[J]. 工业水处理, 2017, 37(9):26-29.HUANG Q T, SONG X L. Influences of extra carbon sources on the removal of nitrogen and phosphate by AOA-SBR process[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2017, 37(9):26-29. [11] 顾学林. 低C/N值污水处理的总氮达标研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2019, 35(9):96-99.GU X L. Discharge standard achievement of TN in treatment of sewage with low C/N ratio[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2019, 35(9):96-99. [12] WU C Y, PENG Y Z, LI X L, et al. Effect of carbon source on biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in an anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A2O) process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2010, 136(11):1248-1254.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000262[13] JOHN K D, ZHANG H, LI Y F. The external carbon source to each stages of A2/O process for simultaneously nitrogen and phosphorus removal[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 8(1):140-153. [14] 杨杰, 李冬, 罗亚红, 等. SBR后置缺氧反硝化除磷的启动及去除性能[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(5):1376-1383.YANG J, LI D, LUO Y H, et al. The start-up and performance of denitrifying phosphorus removal process in a post-anoxic SBR system[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016, 36(5):1376-1383. [15] WISNIEWSKI K, KOWALSKI M, MAKINIA J. Modeling nitrous oxide production by a denitrifying-enhanced biologically phosphorus removing (EBPR) activated sludge in the presence of different carbon sources and electron acceptors[J]. Water Research, 2018, 142:55-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.041[16] PANSWAD T, TONGKHAMMAK N, ANOTAI J. Estimation of intracellular phosphorus content of phosphorus-accumulating organisms at different P:COD feeding ratios[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 84(2):141-145.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.013[17] 楚想想, 罗丽, 王晓昌, 等. 我国城镇污水处理厂的能耗现状分析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2018, 34(7):70-74.CHU X X, LUO L, WANG X C, et al. Analysis on current energy consumption of wastewater treatment plants in China[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2018, 34(7):70-74.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 572
- HTML全文浏览量: 188
- PDF下载量: 41
- 被引次数: 0