留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

天然气开采水基钻井固体废物污染特性及一体化处理技术效果

韩桂梅 党春阁 郭亚静 林雨琛 李子秀 颜家霖 方刚 周长波

韩桂梅,党春阁,郭亚静,等.天然气开采水基钻井固体废物污染特性及一体化处理技术效果:以苏里格气田为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(3):967-974 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210197
引用本文: 韩桂梅,党春阁,郭亚静,等.天然气开采水基钻井固体废物污染特性及一体化处理技术效果:以苏里格气田为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(3):967-974 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210197
HAN G M,DANG C G,GUO Y J,et al.Pollution characteristics and effect of integrated treatment technology of solid wastes from water-based drilling for natural gas exploitation: taking Sulige Gas Field as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(3):967-974 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210197
Citation: HAN G M,DANG C G,GUO Y J,et al.Pollution characteristics and effect of integrated treatment technology of solid wastes from water-based drilling for natural gas exploitation: taking Sulige Gas Field as an example[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(3):967-974 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210197

天然气开采水基钻井固体废物污染特性及一体化处理技术效果—以苏里格气田为例

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210197
基金项目: 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07301-004)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    韩桂梅(1985—),女,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事工业固体废物资源化综合利用、清洁生产技术研究,hangui_mei@126.com

    通讯作者:

    方刚(1987—),男,工程师,硕士,主要从事清洁生产政策、技术及固体废物资源化研究,fanggang@craes.org.cn

    周长波(1973—),男,研究员,博士,主要从事工业固体废物处置资源化、清洁生产、低碳绿色发展研究,zhoucb@edcmep.org.cn

  • 中图分类号: X705

Pollution characteristics and effect of integrated treatment technology of solid wastes from water-based drilling for natural gas exploitation: taking Sulige Gas Field as an example

  • 摘要:

    天然气开采过程产生大量的钻井固体废物,其中含有石油烃、无机盐及难降解有机物等有毒有害物质。对苏里格气田5个区块典型钻井现场不同井型、不同井段产生的固体废物进行采样,分析其性能特征、污染特点,研究钻井固体废物分类管控—稳定化预处理—高温氧化一体化处理技术工艺参数,分析利用该技术工艺处理前后钻井固体废物污染物浓度变化情况。结果表明:通过精细化的稳定化预处理技术处理,浅表层钻井固体废物及浸出液中,污染物浓度符合GB 8978—1996《污水综合排放标准》最高允许限值要求;深层井段钻井固体废物中石油烃的削减率均在98.6%以上,浓度符合GB 36600—2018《土壤环境质量 建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)》建设用地土壤污染第二类用地筛选值要求,残渣中重金属和有机物浓度显著降低,符合GB 8978—1996《污水综合排放标准》限值要求。另外,固体废物体积缩减41.2%。该一体化处理技术可从源头上解决天然气开采钻井固体废物处理处置问题,与现有传统不分类处理技术相比较,整体成本降低52%,具有较好的推广前景。

     

  • 图  1  苏里格气田不同井段钻井液体系组成

    Figure  1.  Composition of drilling fluid system in different well sections of Sulige Gas Field

    图  2  苏里格气田不同井段钻井废弃泥浆性能指标差异

    Figure  2.  Differences of performance indexes of drilling waste mud in different well sections of Sulige Gas Field

    图  3  钻井固体废物一体化处理技术路线

    Figure  3.  Roadmap of drilling solid waste treatment technology

    图  4  高温氧化焚烧前后深层井段钻井固体废物石油烃浓度变化

    Figure  4.  Changes of petroleum hydrocarbons concentrations of drilling solid wastes in deep sections before and after high temperature oxidation incineration

    图  5  高温氧化焚烧处理前后钻井固体废物重金属浓度变化

    Figure  5.  Changes of heavy metal concentrations of drilling solid wastes before and after high temperature oxidation incineration treatment

    图  6  钻井固体废物分类与混合处理所用药剂成本对比

    Figure  6.  Cost comparison of agents used in classification and mixed treatment of drilling solid wastes

    表  1  钻井固体废物样品的石油烃浓度及pH

    Table  1.   Petroleum hydrocarbons content and pH of drilling solid waste samples

    钻井固体废物样品编号石油烃浓度/(mg/kg)pH
    浅表层井段 1 828 9.41
    2 952 9.50
    3 536 9.47
    4 738 9.62
    5 822 9.45
    深层井段 6 6 390 9.82
    7 6 120 9.94
    8 7 200 10.05
    9 9 120 10.12
    10 7 120 9.78
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 杨德敏, 袁建梅, 程方平, 等.油气开采钻井固体废物处理与利用研究现状[J]. 化工环保,2019,39(2):129-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1878.2019.02.003

    YANG D M, YUAN J M, CHENG F P, et al. Current situation of treatment and utilization of drilling solid waste in oil and gas exploitation[J]. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry,2019,39(2):129-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1878.2019.02.003
    [2] 李开环. 涪陵地区页岩气开采固体废物污染特性及资源化环境风险研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2018.
    [3] 王之超, 何洁, 张曼丽, 等.油基钻井岩屑固化体中多环芳烃释放特征[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(4):647-652. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200013

    Zhichao WANG, Jie HE, Manli ZHAN, et al. Release characteristics of PAHs in oil-based drilling cuttings solidified body[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(4):647-652. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200013
    [4] 吴明霞. 废弃水基钻井液环境影响及固化处理技术研究[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2012.
    [5] 罗伟. 钻井废弃泥浆固化路基材料性能研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015.
    [6] 童刚强. 川东北地区钻井固废的处置研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2014.
    [7] 王松, 刘罡, 李谷.江汉油田废弃水基钻井液对环境的影响研究[J]. 油气田环境保护,1998(3):30-32.

    WANG S, LIU G, LI G. Research on the effect of abandoned water-based drilling fluid upon environment in Jianghan oilfield[J]. Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields,1998(3):30-32.
    [8] 王茂仁. 新疆油田钻井水基固液废弃物不落地处理技术研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2017: 3-5.
    [9] 张媛媛, 祝威, 王利君.油气田企业固体废物处理处置及资源化技术展望[J]. 油气田环境保护,2018,28(1):1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3158.2018.01.001

    ZHANG Y Y, ZHU W, WANG L J. Prospect of oily solid waste treatment and resource utilization technology in oil and gas field enterprises[J]. Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields,2018,28(1):1-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3158.2018.01.001
    [10] 杜春蕾. 油田钻井废弃泥浆中重金属分布特征与污染评价 : 以中石油塔里木分公司塔北井区为例[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2015: 1-2.
    [11] KOGBARA R B, DUMKHANA B B, AYOTAMUNO J M, et al. Recycling stabilised/solidified drill cuttings for forage production in acidic soils[J]. Chemosphere,2017,184:652-663. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.042
    [12] SERRANO S, VLASSOPOULOS D, BESSINGER B, et al. Immobilization of Hg(Ⅱ) by coprecipitation in sulfate-cement systems[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2012,46(12):6767-6775.
    [13] KUMPIENE J, LAGERKVIST A, MAURICE C. Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments: a review[J]. Waste Management,2008,28(1):215-225. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.012
    [14] IRYNA A, LEONID P. The immobilization of heavy metals during drilling sludge utilization[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation,2016,6:123-131.
    [15] 何敏, 张思兰, 张春, 等.钻井与热脱附过程对油基泥浆中矿物油组分变化的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2018,8(3):290-296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.03.038

    HE M, ZHANG S L, ZHANG C, et al. Effects of drilling and thermal desorption process on the change of mineral oil compositions in oil-based mud[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2018,8(3):290-296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2018.03.038
    [16] WAN S Y, YU S Y, HE T P, et al. Application of microbial treatment on waterbased drilling waste[J]. Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields,2019,29(2):33-36.
    [17] 李世刚, 吴明霞, 王宝辉, 等.废弃油基钻井液处理技术研究进展[J]. 化学工业与工程技术,2012,33(5):33-37.

    LI S G, WU M X, WANG B H, et al. Research progress on treating technology of waste oil-based drilling fluid[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry & Engineering,2012,33(5):33-37.
    [18] SANTOS N B C, FAGUNDES F M, de OLIVEIRA AROUCA F, et al. Sedimentation of solids in drilling fluids used in oil well drilling operations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,162:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.12.026
    [19] FENG D, LORENZEN L, ALDRICH C, et al. Ex situ diesel contaminated soil washing with mechanical methods[J]. Minerals Engineering,2001,14(9):1093-1100. doi: 10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00114-5
    [20] CONNER J R, HOEFFNER S L. A critical review of stabilization/solidification technology[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology,1998,28(4):397-462. doi: 10.1080/10643389891254250
    [21] 苏勤, 何青水, 张辉, 等.国外陆上钻井废弃物处理技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2010,38(5):106-110.

    SU Q, HE Q S, ZHANG H, et al. Foreign onshore drilling waste treatment technology[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2010,38(5):106-110.
    [22] 韩桂梅, 周长波, 方刚, 等.天然气开采钻井固体废物处理处置及资源化技术的应用现状及展望[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(3):583-590.

    HAN G M, ZHOU C B, FANG G, et al. Application status and prospects of solid waste disposal and resource utilization technology in natural gas extraction drilling[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(3):583-590.
    [23] 生态环境部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量 建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准: GB 36600—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
    [24] ORESHKIN D V, CHEBOTAEV A N, PERFILOV V A. Disposal of drilling sludge in the production of building materials[J]. Procedia Engineering,2015,111:607-611. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.053
    [25] 王朝强, 林晓燕, 梅绪东, 等. 我国页岩气开采钻井岩屑处理处置现状: 以重庆地区为例[C]. 2017油气田勘探与开发国际会议(IFEDC2017)论文集, 2017.
    [26] 吕倩楠.大牛地气田水基钻井岩屑危险特性鉴别[J]. 石油与天然气化工,2018,47(5):112-116.

    LYU Q N. Research on hazard identification of water-based drilling cuttings in Daniudi gas field[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas,2018,47(5):112-116.
    [27] 龚选波, 王广才.石油烃污染场地健康风险评价[J]. 中国水利技术信息中心,2009,6:127-132.
    [28] 丁安军, 王雨辰, 廖长君, 等.钻井含油污泥高温热解处理技术研究应用[J]. 石油地质与工程,2018,32(5):119-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2018.05.032

    DING A J, WANG Y C, LIAO C J, et al. Study and application of high temperature pyrolysis technology for drilling oily sludge[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2018,32(5):119-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2018.05.032
    [29] 黄慧, 聂志强, 孟棒棒, 等.不同处理工艺页岩气钻井岩屑的污染特性[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(3):777-782.

    HUANG H, NIE Z Q, MENG B B, et al. Pollution characteristics of typical field shale gas drilling cuttings with different treatment processes[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(3):777-782.
    [30] 黄思雨, 王嫣云, 周博逊, 等.页岩气开发油基钻屑-单组分生物质共热解特性[J]. 环境科学研究,2019,32(6):1074-1080.

    HUANG S Y, WANG Y Y, ZHOU B X, et al. Co-pyrolysis characteristics of oil-based drill cuttings and one-component biomass in shale gas exploitation[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2019,32(6):1074-1080.
    [31] 王丽芳. 废弃油基钻屑焚烧处理特征研究[D]. 西安: 陕西科技大学, 2017.
    [32] 宋薇, 刘建国, 聂永丰.含油污泥组成及其对热解特性的影响[J]. 环境科学,2008,29(7):2063-2067. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2008.07.051

    SONG W, LIU J G, NIE Y F. Components of oil sludge and their influence on pyrolysis behaviors[J]. Environmental Science,2008,29(7):2063-2067. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2008.07.051
    [33] WANG X D, LI C X, ZHANG B, et al. Migration and risk assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge during hydrothermal treatment combined with pyrolysis[J]. Bioresource Technology,2016,221:560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.069
    [34] DE LUAN J, LI A M, SU T, et al. Translocation and toxicity assessment of heavy metals from circulated fluidized-bed combustion of oil shale in Huadian, China[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,166(2/3):1109-1114. ⊕
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  425
  • HTML全文浏览量:  197
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-05-26
  • 录用日期:  2021-10-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-06-07

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回