地下水脱砷技术的研究现状及发展趋势

石乐琪; 郭莉; 吕晨阳; 杜冬云

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210284

地下水脱砷技术的研究现状及发展趋势

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210284

石乐琪^{1, 2,},
郭莉^{1, 2},
吕晨阳^{1, 2},
杜冬云^{1, 2, ,}

1.
中南民族大学, 湖北省重金属污染防治工程技术研究中心
2.
中南民族大学, 催化转化与能源材料化学教育部重点实验室

基金项目: 湖北省重大科技创新项目（2019ACA156）；湖北省重点研发计划项目（2020BCB062）

详细信息

作者简介:
石乐琪（1997—），女，硕士研究生，主要从事污染控制化学研究，1609509320@qq.com

通讯作者:
杜冬云（1963—），男，教授，主要从事污染控制化学研究，dydu666@mail.scuec.edu.cn

中图分类号: X523
计量
- 文章访问数: 289
- HTML全文浏览量: 148
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-01

Research status and development trend of the technology for arsenic removal from groundwater

SHI Leqi^{1, 2
,},
GUO Li^{1, 2},
LÜ Chenyang^{1, 2},
DU Dongyun^{1, 2
, ,}

1.
Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center of Heavy Metal Pollution Prevention and Control, South-Central Minzu University
2.
Key Laboratory of Catalytic Conversion and Energy Materials Chemistry of Ministry of Education, South-Central Minzu University

摘要

摘要:
为明确地下水脱砷技术研究现状及未来发展趋势，采用文献计量学方法统计分析了Web of Science（WoS）数据库中2008—2020年发表的关于地下水脱砷技术的文献资料，并从年度发文量、发文机构、发文期刊、发文作者以及论文关键词等方面进行分析。结果表明：WoS数据库中地下水脱砷技术方面的研究型论文共1 501篇，年度发文量总体呈上升趋势；中国、美国和印度为发文量排名前3的国家；共计1 503家研究机构、4 875名作者参与地下水脱砷技术研究，其中高等院校为主要研究机构，而高校教师与硕士、博士研究生则为研究的主力军；关键词分析表明，吸附和电絮凝技术是地下水脱砷的主流方法，其中零价铁材料作为吸附剂是贯穿2008—2020年的研究热点；通过突现分析得出，二元甚至多元氧化物和纳米复合材料的制备将成为未来地下水脱砷技术研究的热点方向。
- 地下水 /
- 除砷 /
- 文献计量 /
- 研究趋势 /
- Web of Science(WoS)数据库
Abstract:
To clarify the research status and future development trend of arsenic removal from groundwater, the bibliometric method was used to analyze the literature on arsenic removal from groundwater published in the Web of Science (WoS) database from 2008 to 2020, and the comprehensive analysis was conducted from the aspects of the annual number of articles published, publishing organizations, journals, authors, and keywords. The results indicated that: in WoS database, there were 1 501 research papers on arsenic removal from groundwater, and the annual number of publications was on an overall upward trend; the top three countries in terms of publication volume were China, the United States and India; a total of 1 503 research institutions and 4 875 authors participated in the research of arsenic removal from groundwater, in which universities were the main research bases, and university teachers, postgraduate students werethe main force of the research. Keywords analysis showed that the adsorption and electrocoagulation technology were the mainstream methods for arsenic removal from groundwater, the zero-valent iron materials were popular adsorbents applied in the research from 2008 to 2020. At the same time, the emergence analysis showed that the preparation of binary or even multiple oxides and nanocomposites would become the frontier hotspot in the research of arsenic removal from groundwater.
- groundwater /
- arsenic removal /
- bibliometrics /
- researching trends /
- Web of Science (WoS) database

HTML全文

图 1 2008—2020年地下水脱砷技术研究的发文量及发文国家占比

Figure 1. Number of articles published and the proportion of published countriesin in the research field of groundwater arsenic removal technology from 2008 to 2020

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 2008—2020年地下水脱砷技术研究机构共现图谱

Figure 2. Co-occurrence map of research institutes for groundwater arsenic removal technology from 2008 to 2020

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 2008—2020年地下水脱砷技术研究相关作者发文情况共现图谱

Figure 3. Co-occurrence map of authors' papers on groundwater arsenic removal technology from 2008 to 2020

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 2008—2020年发文量排名前5的国家及其发文量

Table 1. Top 5 countries and their annual number of publications from 2008 to 2020 篇

年份	中国	印度	美国	韩国	澳大利亚
2008	5	12	20	5	0
2009	9	12	19	8	3
2010	15	22	18	3	1
2011	19	17	18	4	0
2012	30	21	19	4	1
2013	26	21	21	4	4
2014	34	18	27	3	2
2015	30	20	23	3	5
2016	40	26	29	6	9
2017	47	15	16	8	3
2018	33	16	16	9	7
2019	46	36	14	8	16
2020	35	30	19	11	17

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2008—2020年地下水脱砷技术研究发文量排名前10的期刊

Table 2. Top 10 journals in the number of articles published on groundwater arsenic removal technology from 2008 to 2020

期刊名称	发文量/篇	发文量占比/%	2020年影响因子	科学网学科类别
Journal of Hazardous Materials	94	6.26	9.04	工程技术
Desalination and Water Treatment	60	4.00	0.85	工程技术
Water Research	58	3.86	9.13	环境科学与生态学
Chemical Engineering Journal	51	3.40	10.65	工程技术
Chemosphere	48	3.20	5.78	环境科学与生态学
Environmental Science & Technology	48	3.20	4.36	环境科学与生态学
Environmental Science and Pollution Research	42	2.80	3.06	环境科学与生态学
Science of the Total Environmental	41	2.73	6.55	环境科学与生态学
Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A： Toxic/Hazardous Substances Environmental Engineering	28	1.87	0.97	环境科学与生态学
RSC Advances	28	1.87	3.12	化学

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2008—2020年地下水脱砷技术研究发文量排名前20的发文机构

Table 3. Top 20 institutions in the number of articles published in groundwater arsenic removal technology from 2008 to 2020

机构名称		发文量/篇	占比/ %	排名
英文名称	中文名称	发文量/篇	占比/ %	排名
Chinese Academy of Sciences	中国科学院	83	5.53	1
China University of Geosciences	中国地质大学	52	3.46	2
Indian Institute of Technology	印度理工学院	46	3.07	3
Tongji University	同济大学	23	1.53	4
Indian Institute of Technology	印度国立理工学院	18	1.20	5
National University of Singapore	新加坡国立大学	16	1.07	6
University Guanajuato	瓜纳华托大学	16	1.07	6
Nanjing University	南京大学	15	1.00	8
University of California, Berkeley	加州大学伯克利分校	15	1.00	8
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences	中国科学院大学	15	1.00	8
University of Science and Technology of China	中国科学技术大学	15	1.00	8
University of Southern Queensland	南昆士兰大学	15	1.00	8
Delft University of Technology	代尔夫特大学技术学院	14	0.93	13
Taiwan University	台湾大学	14	0.93	13
University of Belgrade	贝尔格莱德大学	14	0.93	13
University of Novi Sad	诺维萨德大学	14	0.93	13
US Environmental Protection Agency	美国国家环境保护局	14	0.93	13
Central South University	中南大学	12	0.80	18
Cheng Kung University	台湾成功大学	12	0.80	18
Tsinghua University	清华大学	12	0.80	18

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2008—2020年出现频次排名前20的地下水脱砷技术研究的关键词

Table 4. Keywords of groundwater arsenic removal technology with top 20 occurrences in 2008-2020

排序	关键词		出现频次/次	中心性
排序	英文名称	中文名称	出现频次/次	中心性
1	groundwater	地下水	961	0.00
2	adsorption	吸附	717	0.00
3	arsenic	砷	539	0.00
4	drinking water	饮用水	421	0.01
5	removal	去除	421	0.00
6	water	水资源	388	0.01
7	arsenic removal	砷去除	370	0.01
8	aqueous solution	水溶液	336	0.02
9	sorption	吸附作用	299	0.02
10	iron	铁矿	285	0.01
11	oxidation	氧化	225	0.02
12	adsorbent	吸附剂	211	0.02
13	kinetics	动力学	205	0.02
14	As(Ⅲ)	三价砷	199	0.02
15	nanoparticle	纳米颗粒	151	0.02
16	contamination	污染物	150	0.02
17	As(Ⅴ)	五价砷	138	0.04
18	zero valent iron	零价铁	124	0.04
19	remediation	修复	121	0.04
20	speciation	物种形成	120	0.02

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 2008—2020年地下水脱砷技术研究关键词突现图谱

Table 5. Keywords of groundwater arsenic removal technology from 2008 to 2020

关键词		年份	突现图谱
英文名称	中文名称	年份	突现图谱
zerovalent iron	零价铁	2008—2010
hydroxide	羟化物	2008—2011
Bangladesh	孟加拉国	2008—2010
phosphate	磷酸	2008—2009
alumina	氧化铝	2008—2011
carbonate	碳酸盐	2008—2011
binary oxide	二元氧化物	2016—2020
electrode	电极	2016—2020
iron electrocoagulation	铁电凝法	2016—2018
Fe(Ⅱ)	二价铁	2017—2018
hexavalent chromium	六价铬	2017—2018
in situ	原位	2017—2018
Fe	铁	2017—2018
graphene oxide	石墨烯氧化物	2017—2020
pollution	污染	2017—2020
contaminant	污染物	2017—2020
biochar	生物炭	2018—2020
adsorptive removal	吸附去除	2018—2020
health risk	健康风险	2018—2020
risk assessment	风险评估	2018—2020
response surface methodology	响应面法	2018—2020
methylene blue	亚甲蓝	2018—2020
simultaneous removal	同时去除	2018—2020
waste water	废水	2018—2020
nanocomposite	纳米复合材料	2018—2020

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(28)

[1]	SINHA D, PRASAD P. Health effects inflicted by chronic low-level arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global public health challenge[J]. Journal of Applied Toxicology,2020,40(1):87-131. doi: 10.1002/jat.3823
[2]	CHEN Q Y, COSTA M. Arsenic: a global environmental challenge[J]. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology,2021,61:47-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-030220-013418
[3]	ALKA S, SHAHIR S, IBRAHIM N, et al. Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: a mini review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278:123805. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123805
[4]	GHOSH S, DEBSARKAR A, DUTTA A. Technology alternatives for decontamination of arsenic-rich groundwater: a critical review[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation,2019,13:277-303.
[5]	SIDDIQ O M, TAWABINI B S, SOUPIOS P, et al. Removal of arsenic from contaminated groundwater using biochar: a technical review[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2022,19(1):651-664. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-03116-x
[6]	郭丽, 王延荣.地下水污染环境评价探讨[J]. 当代化工研究,2021(13):129-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8114.2021.13.061 GUO L, WANG Y R. Discussion on environmental assessment of groundwater pollution[J]. Modern Chemical Research,2021(13):129-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8114.2021.13.061
[7]	王宝燕, 肖巍.地下水污染现状与防治对策研究[J]. 环境与发展,2020,32(10):38-39. WANG B Y, XIAO W. Study on the status quo of groundwater pollution and countermeasures[J]. Environment and Development,2020,32(10):38-39.
[8]	SHAJI E, SANTOSH M, SARATH K V, et al. Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula[J]. Geoscience Frontiers,2021,12(3):101079. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.015
[9]	生态环境部. 2018中国生态环境状况公报[A/OL]. (2019-05-29)[2021-06-02].https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywdt/tpxw/201905/t20190529_704841.shtml.
[10]	曾祥裕, 张春燕.印度应对水危机的政策措施评析[J]. 南亚研究季刊,2015(2):84-93. doi: 10.13252/j.cnki.sasq.2015.02.012 ZENG X Y, ZHANG C Y. Water crisis: the Indian response[J]. South Asian Studies Quarterly,2015(2):84-93. doi: 10.13252/j.cnki.sasq.2015.02.012
[11]	环境保护部. 2016中国环境状况公报[A/OL]. (2017-06-05)[2021-06-02].https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201706/t20170605_415442.htm.
[12]	SIK E, KOBYA M, DEMIRBAS E, et al. Combined effects of co-existing anions on the removal of arsenic from groundwater by electrocoagulation process: optimization through response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2017,5(4):3792-3802. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.004
[13]	MOHORA E, RONČEVIĆ S, AGBABA J, et al. Arsenic removal from groundwater by horizontal-flow continuous electrocoagulation (EC) as a standalone process[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2018,6(1):512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.042
[14]	CASTAÑEDA L F, COREÑO O, NAVA J L. Arsenic and hydrated silica removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation using an up-flow reactor in a serpentine array[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2019,7(5):103353. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103353
[15]	GUO H M, STÜBEN D, BERNER Z, et al. Adsorption of arsenic species from water using activated siderite-hematite column filters[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,151(2/3):628-635.
[16]	LI F L, GUO H M, ZHAO K, et al. Modeling transport of arsenic through modified granular natural siderite filters for arsenic removal[J]. Geoscience Frontiers,2019,10(5):1755-1764. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.002
[17]	CHENG Y, ZHANG S S, HUANG T L, et al. Arsenite removal from groundwater by iron-manganese oxides filter media: behavior and mechanism[J]. Water Environment Research,2019,91(6):536-545. doi: 10.1002/wer.1056
[18]	WU K, WANG M, LI A Z, et al. The enhanced As(Ⅲ) removal by Fe-Mn-Cu ternary oxide via synergistic oxidation: performances and mechanisms[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2021,406:126739. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126739
[19]	PAL M, CHAKRABORTTY S, NAYAK J, et al. Removing toxic contaminants from groundwater by graphene oxide nanocomposite in a membrane module under response surface optimization[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2019,16(8):4583-4594. doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-1924-3
[20]	CHOWDHURY T, ZHANG L, ZHANG J Q, et al. Removal of arsenic(Ⅲ) from aqueous solution using metal organic framework-graphene oxide nanocomposite[J]. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland),2018,8(12):1062. doi: 10.3390/nano8121062
[21]	GIFFORD M, HRISTOVSKI K, WESTERHOFF P. Ranking traditional and nano-enabled sorbents for simultaneous removal of arsenic and chromium from simulated groundwater[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017,601/602:1008-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.126
[22]	CHOWDHURY S R, YANFUL E K. Arsenic and chromium removal by mixed magnetite-maghemite nanoparticles and the effect of phosphate on removal[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2010,91(11):2238-2247. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.003
[23]	GUZMÁN A, NAVA J L, COREÑO O, et al. Arsenic and fluoride removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation using a continuous filter-press reactor[J]. Chemosphere,2016,144:2113-2120. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.108
[24]	NEMADE P D, KADAM A M, SHANKAR H S. Removal of iron, arsenic and coliform bacteria from water by novel constructed soil filter system[J]. Ecological Engineering,2009,35(8):1152-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.013
[25]	YANG L, LI X K, CHU Z R, et al. Distribution and genetic diversity of the microorganisms in the biofilter for the simultaneous removal of arsenic, iron and manganese from simulated groundwater[J]. Bioresource Technology,2014,156:384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.067
[26]	SHAKYA A K, GHOSH P K. Concurrent removal of nitrate, arsenic and iron from simulated and real-life groundwater to meet drinking water standards: effects of operational and environmental parameters[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2019,235:9-18.
[27]	THAKUR L S, MONDAL P. Simultaneous arsenic and fluoride removal from synthetic and real groundwater by electrocoagulation process: parametric and cost evaluation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2017,190:102-112.
[28]	POONIA T, SINGH N, GARG M C. Contamination of arsenic, chromium and fluoride in the Indian groundwater: a review, meta-analysis and cancer risk assessment[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,2021,18(9):2891-2902. ◇ doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-03043-x