Study on the coupling coordination relationship between economic development and ecological environment protection in Gansu Province
-
摘要:
为了对经济发展与生态环境保护的耦合协调程度做出评价,以甘肃省为例,运用综合发展评价模型和耦合协调度模型对经济系统与环境系统耦合协调关系进行研究,从时间和空间上对省级及其下辖的14市(州)2011—2019年经济与环境耦合协调状况进行分析。结果表明:1)甘肃省综合发展水平逐年提升,经济与环境耦合协调度由0.005 5升至0.911 0,耦合协调水平总体处于上升趋势,并在2017年实现良好耦合协调,且经济发展与生态环境保护实现同步;2)14市(州)经济与环境综合发展水平呈上升趋势,部分市(州)在2016年和2018年出现波动,酒泉、兰州等综合发展水平较高,甘南、定西等综合发展水平较低;3)14市(州)经济与环境耦合协调程度在时间上于2016年全部脱离失调衰退进入耦合协调期,从空间上表现为中部最优、北部次之、南部略差。
Abstract:To evaluate the degree of coupling and coordination between economic development and ecological environment protection, the coupling coordination relationship between economic and environmental systems was studied by using the comprehensive development evaluation model and the coupling coordination degree model. Taking Gansu Province as an example, the coupling coordination between economy and environment at the provincial level and 14 cities (prefectures) under its jurisdiction from 2011 to 2019 were analyzed in terms of time and space. The results showed that: 1) The comprehensive development level of Gansu Province increased year by year, and the coupling coordination degree of economy and environment increased from 0.005 5 to 0.911 0. The coupling coordination level of Gansu Province was generally on the rise, and achieved good coupling coordination in 2017 with the synchronization economic development and ecological environment protection. 2) The comprehensive development level of economy and environment in 14 cities (prefectures) showed an upward trend, and some cities (prefectures) showed fluctuations in 2016 and 2018. The comprehensive development level of Jiuquan and Lanzhou was higher, while that of Gannan and Dingxi was lower. 3) The coupling coordination degree of economy and environment in 14 cities (prefectures) all broke away from the imbalance recession and entered the coupling coordination stage in 2016. In space, it was the best in the central region, followed by the north and slightly worse in the south.
-
表 1 经济发展与生态环境保护耦合协调评价指标体系
Table 1. Evaluation index system of coupling coordination between economic development and ecological environment protection
系统层 子系统 指标 单位 指标属性 经济
系统经济
规模人均GDP 万元/人 正向 人均工业增加值 万元/人 正向 人均固定资产投资额 万元/人 正向 第三产业GDP占比 % 正向 消费
潜力城镇化率 % 正向 城镇居民人均消费支出 万元/人 正向 农村人均消费支出 万元/人 正向 在岗职工平均工资 万元 正向 发展
效率劳动生产率 元/人 正向 能源生产率 元/t(以
标煤计)正向 土地生产率 元/m3 正向 科技
投入科技研发人员折合全时人员 人·a 正向 研发经费投入强度 % 正向 环境
系统环境
质量地表水监测断面达到优良以上比例 % 正向 建成区绿化覆盖率 % 正向 空气质量优良天数比率 % 正向 环境
污染废水排放量 万t 负向 COD排放量 万t 负向 氨氮排放量 万t 负向 SO2排放量 万t 负向 氮氧化物排放量 万t 负向 工业固体废物产生量 万t 负向 绿色
低碳能源消耗强度 t/万元
(以标
煤计)负向 水资源消耗强度 t/万元 负向 碳排放强度 t/万元 负向 环境
治理城镇污水处理率 % 正向 城镇生活垃圾无害化处理率 % 正向 一般工业固体废物综合利用率 % 正向 表 2 经济系统与环境系统耦合类型
Table 2. Coupling types of economic and environmental systems
C 耦合类型 C=0 子系统无关且无序发展 0<C≤0.3 低水平耦合 0.3<C≤0.5 颉颃 0.5<C≤0.8 磨合 0.8<C<1 高水平耦合 C=1 子系统良性共振耦合且有序发展 表 3 经济系统与环境系统耦合协调区间及状态
Table 3. Coupling coordination interval and state of economic and environmental systems
D 耦合协调区间 耦合协调状态 0<D≤0.1 失调衰退 极度失调衰退类 0.1<D≤0.2 严重失调衰退类 0.2<D≤0.3 中度失调衰退类 0.3<D≤0.4 过渡调和 轻度失调衰退类 0.4<D≤0.5 濒临失调衰退类 0.5<D≤0.6 勉强耦合协调类 0.6<D≤0.7 低度协调 初级耦合协调类 0.7<D≤0.8 中级耦合协调类 0.8<D≤0.9 高度协调 良好耦合协调类 0.9<D≤1.0 优质耦合协调类 表 4 甘肃省经济与环境耦合协调程度
Table 4. Coupling and coordination degree of economy and environment in Gansu Province
年份 C 耦合类型 D 耦合协调状态 U 协同发展类型 2011 0.000 4 低水平耦合 0.005 5 极度失调衰退类 0.080 7 经济发展滞后型 2012 0.999 6 高水平耦合 0.445 0 濒临失调衰退类 0.984 7 经济环境同步型 2013 0.987 2 高水平耦合 0.550 3 勉强耦合协调类 1.097 3 经济环境同步型 2014 0.764 5 磨合 0.541 1 勉强耦合协调类 1.529 2 环境质量滞后型 2015 0.746 4 磨合 0.587 2 勉强耦合协调类 1.557 9 环境质量滞后型 2016 0.988 5 高水平耦合 0.770 7 中级耦合协调类 1.091 7 经济环境同步型 2017 0.997 7 高水平耦合 0.833 4 良好耦合协调类 0.961 7 经济环境同步型 2018 0.999 5 高水平耦合 0.849 2 良好耦合协调类 1.018 1 经济环境同步型 2019 0.958 9 高水平耦合 0.911 0 优质耦合协调类 1.182 2 经济环境同步型 表 5 甘肃省14市(州)经济与环境综合发展指数
Table 5. Economic and environmental comprehensive development indexes in 14 cities (prefectures) in Gansu Province
市(州) 2011年 2012年 2013年 2014年 2015年 2016年 2017年 2018年 2019年 兰州 0.084 3 0.220 1 0.334 7 0.416 0 0.420 0 0.610 8 0.688 7 0.728 4 0.912 6 嘉峪关 0.212 3 0.301 7 0.298 3 0.315 3 0.342 8 0.640 3 0.657 9 0.758 3 0.757 8 金昌 0.214 8 0.301 8 0.369 3 0.360 1 0.340 8 0.520 2 0.575 9 0.563 0 0.729 2 白银 0.075 1 0.207 4 0.351 2 0.428 1 0.388 9 0.571 2 0.694 5 0.707 7 0.850 1 天水 0.160 3 0.235 4 0.323 3 0.389 9 0.420 2 0.539 5 0.670 8 0.748 0 0.886 7 武威 0.114 4 0.169 4 0.283 1 0.309 4 0.356 0 0.537 9 0.641 4 0.618 0 0.873 0 张掖 0.139 9 0.201 9 0.264 9 0.309 6 0.350 0 0.629 8 0.723 1 0.691 2 0.808 7 平凉 0.173 2 0.307 2 0.358 6 0.386 3 0.404 4 0.598 7 0.643 0 0.701 1 0.824 7 酒泉 0.123 8 0.322 1 0.415 3 0.455 0 0.504 9 0.642 2 0.634 2 0.733 0 0.713 8 庆阳 0.189 1 0.311 5 0.401 4 0.467 7 0.513 0 0.563 8 0.543 3 0.654 6 0.743 8 定西 0.199 2 0.228 6 0.292 6 0.341 6 0.356 2 0.431 3 0.519 9 0.646 4 0.866 2 陇南 0.225 2 0.258 4 0.279 6 0.379 0 0.353 0 0.546 3 0.628 8 0.696 5 0.790 5 临夏 0.123 9 0.217 2 0.308 4 0.390 1 0.394 1 0.564 8 0.728 6 0.787 6 0.864 2 甘南 0.355 0 0.107 8 0.225 4 0.312 9 0.380 0 0.400 6 0.542 0 0.585 1 0.686 4 -
[1] HAN H, GUO L, ZHAN J Q, et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of the coordination of economic development, resource utilization, and environmental quality in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration[J]. Ecological Indicators,2021,127:107724. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107724 [2] LIU Y, YANG L Y, JIANG W. Coupling coordination and spatiotemporal dynamic evolution between social economy and water environmental quality: a case study from Nansi Lake catchment, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2020,119:106870. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106870 [3] 徐建伟, 傅泽强, 谢园园, 等.基于EKC假说的经济增长与资源和环境协调性分析: 以铁岭市为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2016,6(3):290-294. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2016.03.013XU J W, FU Z Q, XIE Y Y, et al. Coordination analysis on economic growth and resources and environment based on EKC: a case study on Tieling City[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2016,6(3):290-294. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2016.03.013 [4] 严雨男, 刘玉邦.基于距离协调度和GM模型的四川3E系统耦合协调度评价研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2020,50(24):241-250.YAN Y N, LIU Y B. Research on Coordination evaluation of Sichuan 3E system based on distance coordination and GM Model[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2020,50(24):241-250. [5] 王凌青,王雪平,方华军,等.青藏高原典型区域资源环境与社会经济耦合分析[J/OL]. 环境科学学报:1-9[2021-06-02]. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2020.0535. [6] 唐晓灵, 杜莉.基于引力模型的区域经济发展与生态环境耦合协调研究: 以陕西省为例[J]. 生态经济,2020,36(7):164-169.TANG X L, DU L. Research on coupling coordination between regional economic development and ecological environment based on gravity model: taking Shaanxi Province as an example[J]. Ecological Economy,2020,36(7):164-169. [7] PENG D M, MU Y T, ZHU Y G. Evaluating the level of coordinated development of fisheries economic growth and environmental quality in selected Chinese regions[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2021,89:106605. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106605 [8] WU M W, WU J Q, ZANG C F. A comprehensive evaluation of the eco-carrying capacity and green economy in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,281:124945. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124945 [9] LIU H M, HUANG B, YANG C. Assessing the coordination between economic growth and urban climate change in China from 2000 to 2015[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,732:139283. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139283 [10] CUI D, CHEN X, XUE Y L, et al. An integrated approach to investigate the relationship of coupling coordination between social economy and water environment on urban scale: a case study of Kunming[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2019,234:189-199. [11] LIN Y Q. Coupling analysis of marine ecology and economy: case study of Shanghai, China[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management,2020,195:105278. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105278 [12] SHEN L Y, HUANG Y L, HUANG Z H, et al. Improved coupling analysis on the coordination between socio-economy and carbon emission[J]. Ecological Indicators,2018,94:357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.068 [13] ZHANG Y X, ZHAO F, ZHANG J, et al. Fluctuation in the transformation of economic development and the coupling mechanism with the environmental quality of resource-based cities: a case study of Northeast China[J]. Resources Policy,2021,72:102128. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102128 [14] XU M X, HU W Q. A research on coordination between economy, society and environment in China: a case study of Jiangsu[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,258:120641. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120641 [15] 张姣玉, 龙凤, 毕粉粉, 等.滨海型工业城市的经济发展和生态环境耦合协调关系研究: 以玉环市为例[J]. 环境污染与防治,2021,43(2):255-258.ZHANG J Y, LONG F, BI F F, et al. A study of coupling coordination between economic development and ecological environment in coastal industrial cities: an example from Yuhuan City[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control,2021,43(2):255-258. [16] YANG Y, WANG L, YANG F, et al. Evaluation of the coordination between eco-environment and socio-economy under the “Ecological County Strategy” in western China: a case study of Meixian[J]. Ecological Indicators,2021,125:107585. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107585 [17] 纪荣婷, 陈梅, 程虎, 等.国家“两山”基地经济与生态环境协调发展评价: 以浙江省宁海县为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2020,10(5):798-805. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190211JI R T, CHEN M, CHENG H, et al. Assessment of economic and environmental coordination development degree in the “Two Mountains” Base: a case study of Ninghai County in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(5):798-805. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190211 [18] 罗翠. 云南岩溶地区经济发展与生态环境耦合协调研究[D]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2020. [19] 郭婧, 周学斌, 任君, 等.青海省湟水谷地经济发展与生态环境耦合协调度的时空分异[J]. 水土保持研究,2018,25(6):242-250.GUO J, ZHOU X B, REN J, et al. Spatiotemporal difference of coupling coordinative degree of economic development and ecological environment in Huangshui Valley, Qinghai Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(6):242-250. [20] SHI T, YANG S Y, ZHANG W, et al. Coupling coordination degree measurement and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between economic development and ecological environment: empirical evidence from tropical and subtropical regions of China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,244:118739. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118739 [21] 段长桂, 董增川, 管西柯, 等.南京市经济发展与生态环境耦合协调关系研究[J]. 水力发电,2017,43(9):5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0559-9342.2017.09.002DUAN C G, DONG Z C, GUAN X K, et al. Study on the coupling relationship of economic development and ecological environment in Nanjing City[J]. Water Power,2017,43(9):5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0559-9342.2017.09.002 [22] 姬溶婧. 河南省经济发展与环境质量耦合协调的时空演变分析[D]. 郑州: 河南财经政法大学, 2020. [23] 李建新, 梁曼, 钟业喜.长江经济带经济与环境协调发展的时空格局及问题区域识别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(12):2584-2596.LI J X, LIANG M, ZHONG Y X. The spatial-temporal pattern of the coordinated development between economy and environment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and problem areas identification[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2020,29(12):2584-2596. [24] 吴洪发. 浙江经济发展与生态环境质量协调关系分析: 基于高质量发展视角[D]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2018. [25] 甘肃省统计局, 国家统计局甘肃调查总队. 甘肃发展年鉴2020[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2020.