武夷山主峰黄岗山片区生态安全格局构建研究

朱振肖; 柴慧霞; 张箫; 王夏晖; 牟雪洁; 于洋

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210363

武夷山主峰黄岗山片区生态安全格局构建研究

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210363

生态环境部环境规划院

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0506604）

详细信息

作者简介:
朱振肖（1989—），女，工程师，硕士，主要从事区域生态保护修复、景观生态规划研究，zhuzx@caep.org.cn

中图分类号: X52
计量
- 文章访问数: 369
- HTML全文浏览量: 173
- PDF下载量: 31
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-29

Research on the construction of ecological security pattern in Huanggang Mountain area, the Main Peak of Wuyi Mountain

Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Ministry of Ecology and Environment

摘要

摘要:
生态安全格局理论为区域尺度的景观综合体生态保护修复实践提供了理论依据和技术路径。以我国东南地区重要的生态屏障——武夷山主峰黄岗山片区为例，按照识别生态源地—构建阻力面—提取生态廊道的研究框架，采用定性与定量相结合的方法，评估提取区域内生态系统服务功能极重要区，将其与自然保护地叠加生成生态源地；采用地类和地形因子对研究区设置阻力面，运用最小累积阻力模型提取生态廊道，将生态功能重要区确定为生态缓冲区，构建黄岗山片区生态安全格局。结果显示：黄岗山片区生态源地面积为5 808.80 km²，占区域面积的34.16%，占比较大，主要分布在江西省南部、福建省北部山地的交界地带；提取生态廊道共21条，长度为455.1 km，呈组团式将中部与东北部、西南部源地斑块连通起来；生态缓冲区面积为1 574.13 km²，占比为9.2%，主要分布在研究区的北部山区。研究打破省域、市域、流域界限，将研究区视为一个完整的生命共同体，充分考虑生态结构的完整性、生态过程的连通性以及生态功能的重要性，构建区域尺度点线面状的生态安全格局，可为当地实施区域一体化保护和修复提供空间指引。
- 生态安全格局 /
- 最小累积阻力模型 /
- 生态系统服务 /
- 生态保护修复 /
- 黄岗山片区
Abstract:
The theory of ecological security pattern provides theoretical basis and technical path for the ecological protection and restoration of landscape complex at regional scale. Taking the important ecological barrier in Southeast China, that is Huanggang Mountain area, the main peak of Wuyi Mountain, as an example, according to the research framework of "Identifying ecological sources - Constructing resistance surfaces - Extracting ecological corridors", a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was adopted to evaluate and extract the areas with extremely important ecosystem service functions in the region, and superimpose the areas with natural reserves to generate ecological source areas. And the resistance surfaces were set for the study area with land type and terrain factors, then the minimum cumulative resistance model was used to extract the ecological corridors, the important ecological function areas were determined as the ecological buffer zones, and the ecological security pattern of Huanggang Mountain area was constructed. The results showed that the area of ecological sources in Huanggang Mountain area was high at 5 808.8 km², accounting for 34.16% of the regional land area, which were mainly distributed in the junction zones between the southern mountains in Jiangxi Province and northern mountains in Fujian Province. 21 ecological corridors in total were extracted, with a length of 455.1 km, connecting the central part of the study area with the source patches in the northeast and southwest in a group form. The ecological buffer zones covered an area of 1 574.13 km², accounting for 9.2%, and mainly distributed in the northern mountainous areas of the region. The study broke the boundaries of provinces, cities and river basins, regarded the study area as a complete community of life, fully considered the integrity of ecological structure, the connectivity of ecological process and the importance of ecological functions, and constructed a regional-scale point-line-plane ecological security pattern, which could provide spatial guidance for the local implementation of regional integrated conservation and restoration.
- ecological security pattern /
- minimum cumulative resistance model /
- ecosystem service /
- ecological protection and restoration /
- Huanggang Mountain area

HTML全文

图 1 研究技术路线

Figure 1. Research technical route

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 黄岗山片区生态源地空间分布

Figure 2. Spatial distribution of ecological sources in Huanggang Mountain area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 黄岗山片区生态阻力空间分异

Figure 3. Spatial differentiation of ecological resistance value in Huanggang Mountain area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 黄岗山片区生态廊道分布

Figure 4. Spatial distribution of ecological corridors in Huanggang Mountain area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 黄岗山片区生态安全格局

Figure 5. Ecological security pattern in Huanggang Mountain area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同阻力因子的阻力赋值

Table 1. Resistance values of different resistance factors

阻力因子		权重	阻力赋值
阻力因子		权重	300	100	50	10	1
土地覆盖类型		0.50	建设用地、未利用地	农田	草地	林地	湿地
地形	高程/m	0.15	<50	50~200	200~500	500~1 000	>1 000
地形	坡度/(°)	0.15	<5	5~10	10~20	20~30	>30
湿地	与湿地距离/m	0.10	>1 500	800~1 500	300~800	<300	湿地内
林地	与林地距离/m	0.10	>1 500	1 000~1 500	500~1 000	<500	林地内

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 黄岗山片区生态源地分县（市、区）统计情况

Table 2. Distribution of ecological sources in each county (city, district) in Huanggang Mountain area

县（市、区）		数量/个	面积/km²	面积占比/%
江西省	上饶县	33	1 413.66	25.35
	铅山县	21	2 039.82	36.58
	广丰县	19	706.81	12.67
福建省	光泽县	14	385.91	6.92
	武夷山市	13	631.47	11.32
	建阳区	9	168.59	3.02
	浦城县	14	230.81	4.14
合计		123	5 577.16	100

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(38)

[1]	陈利顶, 孙然好, 孙涛, 等.城市群生态安全格局构建: 概念辨析与理论思考[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(11):4251-4258. CHEN L D, SUN R H, SUN T, et al. Eco-security pattern building in urban agglomeration: conceptual and theoretical thinking[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(11):4251-4258.
[2]	黎晓亚, 马克明, 傅伯杰, 等.区域生态安全格局: 设计原则与方法[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(5):1055-1062. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.05.029 LI X Y, MA K M, FU B J, et al. The regional pattern for ecological security (RPES): designing principles and method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(5):1055-1062. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.05.029
[3]	COSTANZA R, de GROOT R, BRAAT L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go[J]. Ecosystem Services,2017,28:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
[4]	YU Q, YUE D P, WANG Y H, et al. Optimization of ecological node layout and stability analysis of ecological network in desert oasis: a typical case study of ecological fragile zone located at Deng Kou County (Inner Mongolia)[J]. Ecological Indicators,2018,84:304-318. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.002
[5]	LIU D, CHANG Q. Ecological security research progress in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(5):111-121. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.07.001
[6]	KATTEL G R, ELKADI H, MEIKLE H. Developing a complementary framework for urban ecology[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2013,12(4):498-508.
[7]	俞孔坚, 王思思, 李迪华. 区域生态安全格局: 北京案例[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[8]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等.区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(3):407-419. PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction[J]. Geographical Research,2017,36(3):407-419.
[9]	汤峰, 王力, 张蓬涛, 等.基于生态保护红线和生态网络的县域生态安全格局构建[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(9):263-272. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.09.030 TANG F, WANG L, ZHANG P T, et al. Construction of county-level ecological security pattern based on ecological protection red line and network in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(9):263-272. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.09.030
[10]	袁鹏奇. 基于生态安全格局的汝阳县域生态红线划定研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
[11]	王成新, 万军, 于雷, 等. 基于生态网络格局的城市生态保护红线优化研究: 以青岛市为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(增刊1): 9-14. WANG C X, WAN J, YU L, et al. Research on the optimization of urban ecological redline based on ecological network pattern: taking Qingdao as an example[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(Suppl 1): 9-14.
[12]	徐德琳, 邹长新, 裴文明, 等.基于生态保护红线的佳木斯市生态安全格局构建[J]. 环境生态学,2019,1(4):8-14. XU D L, ZOU C X, PEI W M, et al. Ecological security pattern construction of Jiamusi City based on ecological protection redlines[J]. Environmental Ecology,2019,1(4):8-14.
[13]	余珮珩, 冯明雪, 刘斌, 等.顾及生态安全格局的流域生态保护红线划定及管控研究: 以云南杞麓湖流域为例[J]. 湖泊科学,2020,32(1):89-99. doi: 10.18307/2020.0109 YU P H, FENG M X, LIU B, et al. Demarcation and administration of watershed ecological protection red line considering the ecological security pattern:a case of the Qilu Lake Watershed, Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences,2020,32(1):89-99. doi: 10.18307/2020.0109
[14]	张亮. 基于生态安全格局的城市增长边界划定与管理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
[15]	丛佃敏, 赵书河, 于涛, 等.综合生态安全格局构建与城市扩张模拟的城市增长边界划定: 以天水市规划区(2015—2030年)为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2018,33(1):14-26. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20161330 CONG D M, ZHAO S H, YU T, et al. Urban growth boundary delimitation method integrating comprehensive ecological security pattern and urban expansion simulation:a case study of planning areas in Tianshui City (2015-2030)[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2018,33(1):14-26. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20161330
[16]	周锐, 王新军, 苏海龙, 等.基于生态安全格局的城市增长边界划定: 以平顶山新区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊,2014(4):57-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2014.04.010 ZHOU R, WANG X J, SU H L, et al. Delimitation of urban growth boundary based on ecological security pattern[J]. Urban Planning Forum,2014(4):57-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2014.04.010
[17]	杜腾飞, 齐伟, 朱西存, 等.基于生态安全格局的山地丘陵区自然资源空间精准识别与管制方法[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(5):1190-1200. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200514 DU T F, QI W, ZHU X C, et al. Precise identification and control method of natural resources space based on ecological security pattern in mountainous hilly area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(5):1190-1200. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200514
[18]	李政, 丁忆, 王亚林, 等.基于最小累积阻力模型的山地石漠化地区生态安全格局构建: 以重庆市南川区为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(8):1046-1054. LI Z, DING Y, WANG Y L, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern in mountain rocky desertification area based on MCR model: a case study of Nanchuan, Chongqing[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2020,36(8):1046-1054.
[19]	韩世豪, 梅艳国, 叶持跃, 等.基于最小累积阻力模型的福建省南平市延平区生态安全格局构建[J]. 水土保持通报,2019,39(2):192-198. HAN S H, MEI Y G, YE C Y, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern in yanping district of Nanping City, Fujian Province based on minimum cumulative resistance model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,39(2):192-198.
[20]	陈德权, 兰泽英, 李玮麒.基于最小累积阻力模型的广东省陆域生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(7):826-835. CHEN D Q, LAN Z Y, LI W Q. Construction of land ecological security in Guangdong Province from the perspective of ecological demand[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2019,35(7):826-835.
[21]	卢卓, 吴冰, 刘晓光, 等.基于边介数的省域生态廊道构建方法优化[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(3):700-708. LU Z, WU B, LIU X G, et al. Optimization of construction method of provincial ecological corridor based on edge-betweenness[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(3):700-708.
[22]	谭华清, 张金亭, 周希胜.基于最小累计阻力模型的南京市生态安全格局构建[J]. 水土保持通报,2020,40(3):282-288. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.041 TAN H Q, ZHANG J T, ZHOU X S. Construction of ecological security patterns based on minimum cumulative resistance model in Nanjing City[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,40(3):282-288. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.03.041
[23]	曹秉帅, 单楠, 顾羊羊, 等.呼伦湖流域生态安全评价及时空分布格局变化趋势研究[J]. 环境科学研究,2021,34(4):801-811. CAO B S, SHAN N, GU Y Y, et al. Evaluation of ecological security in Hulun Lake Watershed and its spatio-temporal distribution trend[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(4):801-811.
[24]	李博, 甘恬静.基于ArcGIS与GAP分析的长株潭城市群水安全格局构建[J]. 水资源保护,2019,35(4):80-88. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2019.04.013 LI B, GAN T J. Construction of water security pattern of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration based on ArcGIS and GAP analysis[J]. Water Resources Protection,2019,35(4):80-88. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2019.04.013
[25]	杨彦昆, 王勇, 程先, 等.基于连通度指数的生态安全格局构建: 以三峡库区重庆段为例[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(15):5124-5136. YANG Y K, WANG Y, CHENG X, et al. Establishment of an ecological security pattern based on connectivity index: a case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in Chongqing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(15):5124-5136.
[26]	方臣, 匡华, 贾琦琪, 等. 基于生态系统服务重要性和生态敏感性的武汉市生态安全格局评价[J/OL]. 环境工程技术学报.https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5972.X.20211029.0939.002.html. FANG C, KUANG H, JIA Q Q, et al. Evaluation of ecological security pattern in Wuhan City based on the importance of ecosystem services and ecological sensitivity[J/OL]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology.https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5972.X.20211029.0939.002.html.
[27]	倪庆琳, 丁忠义, 侯湖平, 等.基于电路理论的生态格局识别与保护研究: 以宁武县为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(5):67-73. NI Q L, DING Z Y, HOU H P, et al. Ecological pattern recognition and protection based on circuit theory[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2019,33(5):67-73.
[28]	覃盟琳, 朱梓铭, 胡城旗, 等.市县国土空间生态修复分区方法与修复策略研究: 以崇左市天等县为例[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版),2020,45(4):802-815. QIN M L, ZHU Z M, HU C Q, et al. Research on zoning methods and strategies of ecological restoration of territorial space at municipal and county level: a case study of Tiandeng County, Chongzuo City[J]. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition),2020,45(4):802-815.
[29]	应凌霄, 王军, 周妍.闽江流域生态安全格局及其生态保护修复措施[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(23):8857-8866. YING L X, WANG J, ZHOU Y. Ecological-environmental problems and solutions in the Minjiang River Basin, Fujian Province, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(23):8857-8866.
[30]	储昭升, 高思佳, 庞燕, 等.洱海流域山水林田湖草各要素特征、存在问题及生态保护修复措施[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(5):507-514. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.07.291 CHU Z S, GAO S J, PANG Y, et al. Characteristics, problems and ecological protection and restoration measures of mountain-river-forest-farmland-lake-grassland elements in Lake Erhai Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(5):507-514. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.07.291
[31]	王晓玉, 冯喆, 吴克宁, 等.基于生态安全格局的山水林田湖草生态保护与修复[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(23):8725-8732. WANG X Y, FENG Z, WU K N, et al. Ecological conservation and restoration of Life Community Theory based on the construction of ecological security pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(23):8725-8732.
[32]	毛诚瑞, 代力民, 齐麟, 等.基于生态系统服务的流域生态安全格局构建: 以辽宁省辽河流域为例[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(18):6486-6494. MAO C R, DAI L M, QI L, et al. Constructing ecological security pattern based on ecosystem services: a case study in Liaohe River Basin, Liaoning Province, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(18):6486-6494.
[33]	徐威杰, 陈晨, 张哲, 等.基于重要生态节点独流减河流域生态廊道构建[J]. 环境科学研究,2018,31(5):805-813. XU W J, CHEN C, ZHANG Z, et al. Ecological corridor construction based on important ecological nodes in Duliujian River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2018,31(5):805-813.
[34]	苏泳娴, 张虹鸥, 陈修治, 等.佛山市高明区生态安全格局和建设用地扩展预案[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(5):1524-1534. doi: 10.5846/stxb201205160733 SU Y X, ZHANG H O, CHEN X Z, et al. The ecological security patterns and construction land expansion simulation in Gaoming[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(5):1524-1534. doi: 10.5846/stxb201205160733
[35]	王洁, 李锋, 钱谊, 等.基于生态服务的城乡景观生态安全格局的构建[J]. 环境科学与技术,2012,35(11):199-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2012.11.042 WANG J, LI F, QIAN Y, et al. Landscape security pattern design based on ecosystem service[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2012,35(11):199-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2012.11.042
[36]	魏黎灵, 李岚彬, 林月, 等.基于生态足迹法的闽三角城市群生态安全评价[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(12):4317-4326. WEI L L, LI L B, LIN Y, et al. Evaluation of the ecological security of Urban Agglomeration on Min Delta based on ecological footprint[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(12):4317-4326.
[37]	GREENBERG J A, RUEDA C, HESTIR E L, et al. Least cost distance analysis for spatial interpolation[J]. Computers & Geosciences,2011,37(2):272-276.
[38]	潘竟虎, 刘晓.基于空间主成分和最小累积阻力模型的内陆河景观生态安全评价与格局优化: 以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 应用生态学报,2015,26(10):3126-3136. PAN J H, LIU X. Assessment of landscape ecological security and optimization of landscape pattern based on spatial principal component analysis and resistance model in arid inland area: a case study of Ganzhou District, Zhangye City, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(10):3126-3136. ◇