留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

五格式净粪池(FcPTR)启动特性研究

杨延梅,  罗勇,  谭伟,  蒋进元,  赫昶钧,  李加加,  陈可

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 环境工程技术学报  > 2023 >  13(1): 255-261
杨延梅，罗勇，谭伟，等.五格式净粪池(FcPTR)启动特性研究[J].环境工程技术学报，2023，13（1）：255-261 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210847
引用本文: 杨延梅，罗勇，谭伟，等.五格式净粪池(FcPTR)启动特性研究[J].环境工程技术学报，2023，13（1）：255-261 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210847
shu
YANG Y M,LUO Y,TAN W,et al.Study on the start-up characteristics of five-compartment purification tank reactor (FcPTR)[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology，2023，13（1）：255-261 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210847
Citation: YANG Y M,LUO Y,TAN W,et al.Study on the start-up characteristics of five-compartment purification tank reactor (FcPTR)[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology，2023，13（1）：255-261 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210847
shu

五格式净粪池(FcPTR)启动特性研究

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210847
  • 1.

    重庆交通大学河海学院

  • 2.

    中国环境科学研究院

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD1100505)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨延梅(1975—)，女，教授，主要从事水污染控制理论与实用技术，cqyymei@163.com

    通讯作者:

    蒋进元(1974—)，男，研究员，主要从事水污染控制技术开发与应用，istiger@163.com

  • 中图分类号: X703

Study on the start-up characteristics of five-compartment purification tank reactor (FcPTR)

  • 1.

    School of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University

  • 2.

    Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences

    摘要
  • 摘要:

    针对三格式化粪池(TcST)出水不达标的问题，构建了一种与TcST容积相等的五格式净粪池(FcPTR)，开展FcPTR与TcST处理实际生活污水的启动特性对比研究。结果表明，第13天〔水力停留时间（HRT）为80 h〕，FcPTR和TcST对CODCr的去除率分别降至44%和31%。第46天，通过降低HRT至36 h，FcPTR和TcST对CODCr的去除率分别升至86%和61%；FcPTR厌氧折流1区pH普遍大于厌氧折流2区，FcPTR厌氧区酸碱比为0.12~0.20，表明FcPTR具有较好的产酸产甲烷相分离特性。通过扫描电镜图分析FcPTR中填料挂膜和污泥生长情况，结果表明在第46天填料挂膜成功，污泥中微生物主要以短杆菌和球状菌为主。FcPTR相对于TcST具有较好的处理效果，CODCr出水达到GB 18918—2002《城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准》一级A标准。

     

    Abstract:

    A five-compartment purification tank reactor (FcPTR) with the same volume as three-compartment septic tank (TcST) was constructed to address the problem of substandard effluent from TcST, and a study of the start-up characteristics of FcPTR and TcST for treating actual domestic wastewater was conducted. The results showed that the removal rates of FcPTR and TcST of CODCr decreased to 44% and 31%, respectively, on the 13th day (HRT is 80 h). On the 46th day (HRT is 36 h), the removal rates of FcPTR and TcST of CODCr increased to 86% and 61%, respectively, by reducing HRT. On the 46th day, pH of FcPTR anaerobic fold 1 zone was generally larger than that of anaerobic fold 2 zone, and the acid to basic ratio of FcPTR anaerobic zone was 0.12-0.20, which had better acidification and methanation separation characteristics. On the 46th day, the filler and sludge in FcPTR were observed by sweeping electron microscopy, the morphology of biofilm on the fillers was successful, and the microorganisms in the sludge were mainly short bacilli and spherical bacteria. Research shows FcPTR had a better treatment effect than TcST, and CODCr effluent reached the Class Ⅰ A of Discharge Standard of Pollutants for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants (GB 18918-2002).

     

    • HTML全文

  • 图  1  试验装置

    Figure  1.  Experimental setup diagram

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  2  FcPTR和TcST启动期进出水CODCr及去除率

    Figure  2.  CODCr and removal rate of inlet and outlet water during FcPTR and TcST startup

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  3  FcPTR各单元CODCr处理贡献率

    Figure  3.  Contribution rate of CODCr treatment of FcPTR units

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  4  FcPTR和TcST中pH变化

    Figure  4.  Variation of pH in FcPTR and TcST

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  5  FcPTR和TcST中VFA浓度变化

    Figure  5.  Variation of VFA concentrations in FcPTR and TcST

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  6  FcPTR和TcST中碱度变化

    Figure  6.  Variations of alkalinity in FcPTR and TcST

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  7  FcPTR中厌氧区不同时期填料表观的变化

    Figure  7.  Apparent variation of filler in the anaerobic zone in FcPTR at different periods

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  8  FcPTR厌氧区填料SEM图

    Figure  8.  SEM images of filler in the anaerobic zone of the FcPTR

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  9  第43天FcPTR厌氧区污泥SEM图

    Figure  9.  SEM images of sludge in the anaerobic area of FcPTR on the 43rd day

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    表  1  PU填料和火山岩填料性质及填充率

    Table  1.   Properties and filling rate of PU filler and volcanic rock filler

    填料规格/mm孔隙率/%比表面积吸水性/%填充率/%
    PU30×30×3096~99≥18 000 m2/m320040
    火山岩$\phi $86512 m2/kg6580
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  FcPTR和TcST运行参数

    Table  2.   Operated parameters of FcPTR and TcST

    项目阶段Ⅰ阶段Ⅱ
    时间/d1~1314~46
    有机负荷/﹝kg/(m3·d)﹞0.060.13
    HRT/h8036
    FcPTR好氧区DO浓度/(mg/L)1.8±0.31.8±0.3
    温度/℃36±236±2
    下载: 导出CSV
    • 参考文献(30)
  • [1] SAEED T, AFRIN R, AL-MUYEED A, et al. Bioreactor septic tank for on-site wastewater treatment: floating constructed wetland integration[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2021,9(4):105606. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105606
    [2] 杨金刚, 王海燕, 周岳溪, 等.三格厌氧池-垂直流人工湿地处理农村灰水[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2013,3(2):85-91.

    YANG J G, WANG H Y, ZHOU Y X, et al. Study of combined three-chamber anaerobic reactor and vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland process for rural grey wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2013,3(2):85-91.
    [3] 王立东, 刘德明, 马世斌, 等.改进型农村三格化粪池的污水处理性能[J]. 环境工程学报,2020,14(10):2831-2836.

    WANG L D, LIU D M, MA S B, et al. Sewage treatment performance of modified rural three-chamber septic tank[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2020,14(10):2831-2836.
    [4] 范彬, 王洪良, 张玉, 等.化粪池技术在分散污水治理中的应用与发展[J]. 环境工程学报,2017,11(3):1314-1321.

    FAN B, WANG H L, ZHANG Y, et al. Application and development of septic tank technology in decentralized wastewater treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2017,11(3):1314-1321.
    [5] STAZI V, TOMEI M C. Enhancing anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater: state of the art, innovative technologies and future perspectives[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2018,635:78-91. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.071
    [6] HASSAN S R, ZWAIN H M, DAHLAN I. Development of anaerobic reactor for industrial wastewater treatment: an overview, present stage and future prospects[J]. Journal of Advanced Scientific Research,2013(4):7-12.
    [7] 刘锦, 南国英, 杨天学.UZBAF处理农村生活污水工艺参数优化研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2011,1(2):118-122.

    LIU J, NAN G Y, YANG T X. Optimization the parameters of UZBAF for treatment of rural sewage[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2011,1(2):118-122.
    [8] FENG J, WANG Y L, JI X Y, et al. Performance and bioparticle growth of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) fed with low-strength domestic sewage[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering,2015,9(2):352-364.
    [9] KRISHNA G V T, KUMAR P, KUMAR P. Treatment of low strength complex wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR)[J]. Bioresource Technology,2008,99(17):8193-8200. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.016
    [10] GUO J B, WANG J H, CUI D, et al. Application of bioaugmentation in the rapid start-up and stable operation of biological processes for municipal wastewater treatment at low temperatures[J]. Bioresource Technology,2010,101(17):6622-6629. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.093
    [11] ZHOU H M, JIANG J Q, ZHAO Q L, et al. Effects of organic loading rates on high-solids anaerobic digestion of food waste in horizontal flow reactor: methane production, stability and mechanism[J]. Chemosphere,2022,293:133650. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133650
    [12] XU Z Q, YUAN H R, LI X J. Anaerobic bioconversion efficiency of rice straw in continuously stirred tank reactor systems applying longer hydraulic retention time and higher load: one-stage vs. two-stage[J]. Bioresource Technology,2021,321:124206. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124206
    [13] SHI J X, XU C Y, HAN Y X, et al. Enhanced anaerobic biodegradation efficiency and mechanism of quinoline, pyridine, and indole in coal gasification wastewater[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2019,361:1019-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.162
    [14] 潘迪, 胡颖, 史静.聚氨酯生物填料强化厌氧处理偶氮染料废水[J]. 水处理技术,2020,46(7):60-62.

    PAN D, HU Y, SHI J. Enhanced anaerobic treatment of azo dye wastewater with polyurethane bio-carrier[J]. Technology of Water Treatment,2020,46(7):60-62.
    [15] 王明铭, 魏俊, 黄荣敏, 等.潜流人工湿地填料及其去除污染物机理研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(4):769-776.

    WANG M M, WEI J, HUANG R M, et al. Research progress of subsurface flow constructed wetland filler and its pollutant removal mechanism[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(4):769-776.
    [16] 彭剑峰, 宋永会, 高红杰, 等.不同填料曝气生物滤池对河水的净化效能[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2011,1(4):339-343.

    PENG J F, SONG Y H, GAO H J, et al. Purification effect of biological aerated filter stuffed with different stuffing for river water[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2011,1(4):339-343.
    [17] 李慧婷, 李永峰, 刘元, 等.复合式厌氧折流板反应器启动中的相分离特性[J]. 化学工程,2010,38(7):83-87.

    LI H T, LI Y F, LIU Y, et al. Phase separation characteristics in start-up process of hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering (China),2010,38(7):83-87.
    [18] LAURENI M, FALÅS P, ROBIN O, et al. Mainstream partial nitritation and anammox: long-term process stability and effluent quality at low temperatures[J]. Water Research,2016,101:628-639. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.005
    [19] SOH Y N A, KUNACHEVA C, WEBSTER R D, et al. Composition and biotransformational changes in soluble microbial products (SMPs) along an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR)[J]. Chemosphere,2020,254:126775. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126775
    [20] RAJAB A R, SALIM M R, SOHAILI J, et al. Feasibility of nutrients removal and its pathways using integrated anaerobic-aerobic sequencing batch reactor[J]. Bioresource Technology Reports,2022,17:100912. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100912
    [21] LIANG Z, SHEN N, LU C C, et al. Effective methane production from waste activated sludge in anaerobic digestion via formic acid pretreatment[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,2021,151:106176. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106176
    [22] YU H Q, FANG H H P. Acidogenesis of gelatin-rich wastewater in an upflow anaerobic reactor: influence of pH and temperature[J]. Water Research,2003,37(1):55-66. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00256-7
    [23] 任南琪, 王爱杰. 厌氧生物技术原理与应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004.
    [24] ZHAO X L, LIU M, YANG S P, et al. Performance and microbial community evaluation of full-scale two-phase anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,814:152525. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152525
    [25] DAMA P, BELL J, FOXON K M, et al. Pilot-scale study of an anaerobic baffled reactor for the treatment of domestic wastewater[J]. Water Science and Technology:a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research,2002,46(9):263-270. doi: 10.2166/wst.2002.0255
    [26] LANGENHOFF A A M, STUCKEY D C. Treatment of dilute wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: effect of low temperature[J]. Water Research,2000,34(15):3867-3875. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00136-6
    [27] PEREIRA E, CAMPOS C, MOTERANI F. Efeitos do pH, acidez e alcalinidade na microbiota de um reator anaeróbio de manta de lodo (UASB) tratando efluentes de suinocultura[J]. Ambiente e Agua:an Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science,2009,4(3):157-168. doi: 10.4136/ambi-agua.109
    [28] DAMASCENO L H S, RODRIGUES J A D, RATUSZNEI S M, et al. Effects of feeding time and organic loading in an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (ASBBR) treating diluted whey[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2007,85(4):927-935. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.001
    [29] BODKHE S. Development of an improved anaerobic filter for municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology,2008,99(1):222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.026
    [30] ZHANG Q T, WANG M M, MA X Y, et al. High variations of methanogenic microorganisms drive full-scale anaerobic digestion process[J]. Environment International,2019,126:543-551. ⊗ doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.005
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
图(9) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  294
  • HTML全文浏览量:  138
  • PDF下载量:  19
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    版权所有 © 《环境工程技术学报》编辑部 京ICP备05031605号-2

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 设计开发