Study on temporal and spatial changes of environmental regulation intensity in China
-
摘要:
环境规制是实现环境质量改善的必然要求，是提升环境保护与经济发展协调性的重要手段，环境规制强度测算是后续展开相关研究的基础。选取9个环境规制强度测度指标，构建环境规制指标体系，采用因子分析方法测算环境规制强度，从时间趋势和空间格局2个方面展开分析。时间维度上，测算了全国层面2011—2019年环境规制强度，提取出规制效果、正式环境规制、环保意识3个公共因子，可以看出，正式环境规制因子和规制效果因子存在交叉变化现象，环保意识因子变动需要时间跨度较大，我国环境规制整体上处于稳定态势且具有轻微波动性。空间维度上，测算了我国30个省（区、市）的环境规制强度，并对其进行聚类分析，得到了环境规制强度等级，表明我国环境规制强度呈现东高西低的空间格局但区域差异性在缩小。最后，从减排投入与管控等正式环境规制与环境规制效果之间的滞后问题、东西部地区的不平衡性、非正式环境规制的重要性等方面展开分析，提出加大环境治理投入与落实、优化产业结构及重视公众环保意识培养是提高我国环境规制强度、促进区域均衡发展的重要措施。
Abstract:Environmental regulation is an inevitable requirement to improve environmental quality and an important means to enhance the coordination between environmental protection and economic development. The calculation of the intensity of environmental regulation is the basis for subsequent related research. Nine environmental regulation intensity measurement indicators were selected to construct the environmental regulation index system. The environmental regulation intensity was calculated by the factor analysis method. The analysis was carried out from two aspects of time trend and spatial pattern. In terms of time dimension, the intensity of environmental regulation at the national level from 2011 to 2019 was measured, and three public factors were extracted, including regulation effect, formal environmental regulation and environmental awareness. There were cross changes between formal environmental regulation factors and regulation effect factors. The change of environmental awareness factors needed a large time span, and China's environmental regulation was stable and slightly fluctuated as a whole. In terms of spatial dimension, the environmental regulation intensity of 30 provinces (autonomous regions and cities) in China was measured, and the level of environmental regulation intensity was obtained by cluster analysis. The environmental regulation intensity in China showed a spatial pattern of high in the east and low in the west, but the regional difference was narrowing. Finally, the lag between formal environmental regulation and environmental regulation effect, such as emission-reduction investment and control, the imbalance between eastern and western regions, and the importance of informal environmental regulation were analyzed. Some suggestions were proposed, including increasing investment and implementation of environmental governance, optimizing industrial structure and paying attention to the cultivation of public environmental awareness, to improve the intensity of environmental regulation and promote balanced regional development.
-
Key words:
- environmental regulation /
- factor analysis /
- time trend /
- spatial pattern
-
表 1 环境规制强度指标体系
Table 1. Indicator system of environmental regulation intensity
目标层 准则层 指标层 指标名称 数据选取 单位 与环境规制强度关系 环境
规制
强度正式环境规制 环境污染治理投资 环境污染治理投资占GDP比例 % ＋ 排污费/环境保护税 排污费/环境保护税占GDP比例 % ＋ 非正式环境规制 环境信访 万人环境信访件数 件/万人 ＋ 环保意识 居民受教育程度 大专以上学历人口占总人口的比例 % ＋ 年龄结构 15岁以下人口占比 % ＋ 收入水平 人均可支配收入 元/人 ＋ 环境规制
效果二氧化硫排放量 单位工业增加值二氧化硫排放量 t/万元 － 烟粉尘排放量 单位工业增加值烟粉尘排放量 t/万元 － 工业废水排放量 单位工业增加值工业废水排放量 t/万元 － 注：＋表示该指标与环境规制强度呈正相关，－表示该指标与环境规制强度呈负相关。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 总方差解释
Table 2. Total variance interpretation
因子 初始特征值 提取载荷平方和 旋转载荷平方和 总计 方差贡献率/% 累计百分比/% 总计 方差贡献率/% 累计百分比/% 总计 方差贡献率/% 累计百分比/% 1 3.961 44.012 44.012 3.961 44.012 44.012 2.909 32.327 32.327 2 2.491 27.683 71.695 2.491 27.683 71.695 2.865 31.835 64.162 3 1.693 18.815 90.511 1.693 18.815 90.511 2.371 26.349 90.511 4 0.458 5.092 95.603 5 0.224 2.490 98.093 6 0.170 1.887 99.980 7 0.000 0.000 100.000 8 0.000 0.000 100.000 9 0.000 0.000 100.000
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 成分矩阵
Table 3. Composition matrix
指标 因子 1 2 3 工业二氧化硫排放量 0.947 0.078 0.265 工业烟粉尘排放量 0.946 0.065 0.264 工业废水排放量 0.937 0.076 0.264 环境污染治理投资 0.380 0.789 −0.205 排污费/环境保护税 0.038 0.956 0.213 环境信访 −0.360 0.806 0.286 居民收入水平 −0.597 −0.732 −0.020 年龄结构 0.292 0.102 0.934 受教育程度 −0.292 −0.102 −0.934
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 2011—2019年KMO检验及Bartlett球形度检验结果
Table 4. KMO inspection and Bartlett sphericity inspection results from 2011 to 2019
年份 KMO检验 Bartlett检验 年份 KMO检验 Bartlett检验 2011 0.654 118.026 2016 0.512 129.953 2012 0.673 123.900 2017 0.613 112.788 2013 0.677 124.583 2018 0.502 118.684 2014 0.551 134.537 2019 0.535 124.258 2015 0.608 121.849
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 2011年、2015年、2019年总方差解释
Table 5. Explanation of total variance in 2011, 2015 and 2019
% 因子 2011年方差
贡献率2015年方差
贡献率2019年方差
贡献率初始值 旋转后 初始值 旋转后 初始值 旋转后 1 44.59 36.13 44.37 31.41 45.42 33.88 2 26.38 25.40 26.07 29.70 24.52 28.54 3 14.04 23.48 15.51 24.84 16.04 23.56 合计 85.01 85.01 85.95 85.95 85.98 85.98
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 2011—2019各省（区、市）环境规制强度聚类结果
Table 6. Clustering results of environmental regulation intensity in various provinces from 2011 to 2019
分类 省（区、市） 高 北京、天津、上海、江苏、浙江、广东 中 中高 山东、河南、福建 中中 海南、湖北、重庆、辽宁 中低 河北、吉林、黑龙江、安徽、江西、湖南、广西、四川、云南、陕西、甘肃、青海、宁夏 低 内蒙古、山西、贵州、新疆
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 2011—2019各省环境规制强度分阶段聚类结果
Table 7. Phased clustering results of environmental regulation intensity in various provinces from 2011 to 2019
分类 阶段1 阶段2 阶段3 高 北京、天津、上海、江苏、浙江、福建、广东 北京、天津、上海、江苏、浙江、广东 北京、上海、江苏、浙江、广东 中 中高 重庆、黑龙江、安徽、江西、湖南、四川、
云南、陕西辽宁、江西、河南、云南、陕西、宁夏 天津、福建、山东、河南、湖北、重庆 中中 吉林、湖北、广西、海南 黑龙江、安徽、山东、湖北、湖南、广西、
海南、四川安徽、河北、山西、辽宁、江西、海南 中低 山东、甘肃、青海、宁夏 福建、重庆、吉林、甘肃、青海 吉林、黑龙江、湖南、广西、云南、四川、
陕西、青海低 辽宁、河北、山西、内蒙古、河南、
贵州、新疆河北、山西、内蒙古、贵州、新疆 内蒙古、贵州、甘肃、宁夏、新疆
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 张晓敏, 邬娜, 吴佳, 等.环境规制内涵、表征及应用述评[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(6):1250-1257. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210056ZHANG X M, WU N, WU J, et al. Review on the connotation, characterization and application of environmental regulation[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(6):1250-1257. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210056 [2] XIE R H, YUAN Y J, HUANG J J. Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on "green" productivity: evidence from China[J]. Ecological Economics,2017,132:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.019 [3] 刘彦卿. 环境规制的经济和环境效应研究: 基于我国省级面板数据的实证分析[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2018. [4] 王玥, 谭雪, 翁智雄, 等.大气规制对全要素生产率的动态影响效应测算[J]. 环境科学研究,2021,34(9):2285-2294. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.06.07WANG Y, TAN X, WENG Z X, et al. Measurement of dynamic impact of atmospheric regulation on total factor productivity[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(9):2285-2294. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.06.07 [5] 张乐勤, 陈素平.基于PLS方法的高技术产业发展对工业污染影响效应测度与分析[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2018,8(5):563-570.ZHANG L Q, CHEN S P. Measurement and analysis of influence effect of high-tech industry development on industrial pollution based on PLS method[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2018,8(5):563-570. [6] 童健, 刘伟, 薛景.环境规制、要素投入结构与工业行业转型升级[J]. 经济研究,2016,51(7):43-57.TONG J, LIU W, XUE J. Environmental regulation, factor input structure and industrial transformation[J]. Economic Research Journal,2016,51(7):43-57. [7] 徐志伟.工业经济发展、环境规制强度与污染减排效果: 基于“先污染, 后治理”发展模式的理论分析与实证检验[J]. 财经研究,2016,42(3):134-144.XU Z W. Industrial economic development, environmental regulation intensity and emissions reduction effect: theoretical analysis and empirical test based on development pattern of treatment after pollution[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics,2016,42(3):134-144. [8] 原毅军, 谢荣辉.环境规制与工业绿色生产率增长: 对“强波特假说”的再检验[J]. 中国软科学,2016(7):144-154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2016.07.016YUAN Y J, XIE R H. Environmental regulation and the "green" productivity growth of China's industry[J]. China Soft Science,2016(7):144-154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2016.07.016 [9] 王雅楠, 左艺辉, 陈伟, 等.环境规制对碳排放的门槛效应及其区域差异[J]. 环境科学研究,2018,31(4):601-608. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2017.03.92WANG Y N, ZUO Y H, CHEN W, et al. Threshold effect and regional differences of environmental regulation on carbon emission[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2018,31(4):601-608. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2017.03.92 [10] 蒋毓琪, 杨怡康, 朱少英.黄河流域山西矿区自然资本占用动态评估及驱动机制[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(4):1264-1271. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.20210327JIANG Y Q, YANG Y K, ZHU S Y. Dynamic evaluation and driving mechanism of natural capital occupation in Shanxi mining areas of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(4):1264-1271. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.20210327 [11] 姬翠梅, 王喜军.多主体协同框架下环境治理体系建设[J]. 知与行,2018(6):132-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1308.2018.06.028 [12] 程钰, 任建兰, 陈延斌, 等.中国环境规制效率空间格局动态演变及其驱动机制[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(1):123-136. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201601011CHENG Y, REN J L, CHEN Y B, et al. Spatial evolution and driving mechanism of China's environmental regulation efficiency[J]. Geographical Research,2016,35(1):123-136. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201601011 [13] 张华.地区间环境规制的策略互动研究: 对环境规制非完全执行普遍性的解释[J]. 中国工业经济,2016(7):74-90.ZHANG H. Strategic interaction of regional environmental regulation: an explanation on the universality of incomplete enforcement of environmental regulation[J]. China Industrial Economics,2016(7):74-90. [14] 徐成龙, 任建兰, 程钰.山东省环境规制效率时空格局演变及影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(12):35-40.XU C L, REN J L, CHENG Y. Influence factors and temporal-spatial evolution of environmental regulation efficiency in Shandong Province[J]. Economic Geography,2014,34(12):35-40. [15] 罗能生, 王玉泽.财政分权、环境规制与区域生态效率: 基于动态空间杜宾模型的实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(4):110-118.LUO N S, WANG Y Z. Fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation and regional eco-efficiency: based on the dynamic spatial Durbin model[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2017,27(4):110-118. [16] 张江雪, 蔡宁, 杨陈.环境规制对中国工业绿色增长指数的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(1):24-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.01.004ZHANG J X, CAI N, YANG C. Impact of environmental regulation on green growth index of industry in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2015,25(1):24-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.01.004 [17] 伍格致, 游达明.环境规制对技术创新与绿色全要素生产率的影响机制: 基于财政分权的调节作用[J]. 管理工程学报,2019,33(1):37-50.WU G Z, YOU D M. The influence mechanism of environmental regulation on technology innovation and green total factor productivity: based on the moderating effect of fiscal decentralization[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2019,33(1):37-50. [18] PARGAL S, WHEELER D. Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1996,104(6):1314-1327. doi: 10.1086/262061 [19] 张鹏鹏. 环境规制对污染密集型产业转移的影响[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2017. [20] 沈坤荣, 金刚, 方娴.环境规制引起了污染就近转移吗[J]. 经济研究,2017,52(5):44-59.SHEN K R, JIN G, FANG X. Does environmental regulation cause pollution to transfer nearby[J]. Economic Research Journal,2017,52(5):44-59. [21] 叶琴, 曾刚, 戴劭勍, 等.不同环境规制工具对中国节能减排技术创新的影响: 基于285个地级市面板数据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(2):115-122.YE Q, ZENG G, DAI S Q, et al. Research on the effects of different policy tools on China's emissions reduction innovation: based on the panel data of 285 prefectural-level municipalities[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2018,28(2):115-122. [22] 臧传琴, 张菡.环境规制技术创新效应的空间差异: 基于2000—2013年中国面板数据的实证分析[J]. 宏观经济研究,2015(11):72-83. □ -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 592
- HTML全文浏览量: 238
- PDF下载量: 38
- 被引次数: 0
