Comparative study on carbon dioxide peaking in some countries and regions and its enlightenment to China
-
摘要:
21世纪以来,中国碳排放量持续处于上升阶段。2030年前碳达峰、2060年前碳中和目标已明确,如何按期实现,面临着诸多挑战。截至2020年,全球约有50个国家实现能源活动二氧化碳排放达峰,排放总量约占全球排放量的36%。从经济水平、产业结构、工业化城镇化水平、能源消费情况、政策支持等角度,以比较分析法对发达国家和地区碳达峰进展进行梳理概述,结果表明:主要国家和地区碳达峰时人均GDP在1万美元以上,美国和日本均在3万美元以上;绝大多数国家和地区碳达峰前后第二产业占比稳步下降,第三产业占比逐步上升;主要国家和地区碳达峰时城镇化率均在53%以上,且1/2以上国家和地区达到75%以上;主要国家和地区碳达峰时能源消费强度多在1.0~4.7 t/万美元(以标准煤计)。从发布的中长期碳排放发展战略及碳中和目标角度,深入论证发达国家和地区实现深度脱碳、开展碳中和方面的经验,指出绝大多数国家和地区均将控制能源消费总量和能源低碳转型作为实现碳中和的重点;将发展循环经济、提升能效作为实现能源消费总量控制的具体措施;将科技创新作为战略竞争优势的重要研究领域和持续动力。结合能源消费情况,中国从碳达峰到碳中和时间仅约30年,意味未来碳达峰后,碳中和任务重。这要求中国的碳达峰不是单纯地攀高峰,而是理性地低位达峰。需加大力度推动经济产业结构调整,构建清洁低碳安全高效能源系统,强化绿色低碳技术的研发创新,有序推进碳排放权交易市场建设。
Abstract:Since the 21st century, China's carbon dioxide emissions have continued to rise. The country has determined the goal of carbon dioxide peaking before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060. There are many challenges in how to achieve it on schedule. By 2020, about 50 countries in the world had reached the target of carbon dioxide peaking, of which the total amount of carbon dioxide emissions accounted for about 36% of global emissions. The progress of carbon dioxide peaking in developed countries and regions was compared and analyzed, from the perspectives of economic level, industrial structure, industrialization and urbanization level, energy consumption, policy support and so on. The results showed that: at the peak of carbon dioxide emissions, the per capita GDP of major countries and regions was more than 10 000 US dollars, and that of the United States and Japan was more than 30 000 US dollars. In most countries and regions, the proportion of the secondary industry decreased steadily, and the proportion of the tertiary industry increased gradually during the period of carbon dioxide peaking. When the major countries and regions achieved the goals of carbon dioxide peaking, the urbanization rate was more than 53%, and more than half of the countries and regions reached more than 75%. When the major countries and regions achieved the goals of carbon dioxide peaking, the consumption intensity of energy was mostly between 1.0 to 4.7 tons of standard coal per 10 000 US dollars. From the perspective of the released medium and long-term carbon dioxide emission development strategy and carbon neutralization goal, the experience of developed countries and regions achieving deep decarbonization and carbon neutralization was expounded in depth. It was pointed out that the vast majority of countries and regions had put the control of the total amount of energy consumption and the transformation of low-carbon energy as their strategic focus, taken the development of the circular economy and the improvement of the energy efficiency as specific measures, and taken the S&T innovation as an important field and continuous motivation. According to the consumption of energy in China, the period from carbon dioxide peaking to carbon neutrality was only 30 years, which meant that after reaching the goal of carbon dioxide peaking, the task of carbon neutrality would be very heavy. This required that China's carbon dioxide peaking should not be simply climbing the peak, but a rational low peak. China needed to make greater efforts to promote the adjustment of economic and industrial structure, build a clean, low-carbon, safe and efficient energy system, strengthen the R&D and innovation of clean and low-carbon technologies, and orderly promote the construction of carbon emission trading market.
-
Key words:
- carbon dioxide peaking /
- carbon neutrality /
- clean energy /
- low-carbon
-
表 1 主要国家和地区碳达峰时间
Table 1. Time of carbon dioxide peaking in major countries and regions
时间 国家和地区 1970—1979年 瑞典、英国、加蓬、比利时、法国 1980—1989年 匈牙利、瑙鲁、保加利亚、波兰、朝鲜、罗马尼亚 1990—1999年 德国、捷克、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、斯洛伐克、乌克兰、津巴布韦、丹麦、北马其顿 2000年至今 法罗群岛、葡萄牙、芬兰、意大利、日本、奥地利、希腊、美国、爱尔兰、西班牙、澳大利亚 表 2 主要国家和地区碳达峰时第三产业占比
Table 2. Proportion of tertiary industry in major countries and regions with carbon dioxide peaking
碳达峰时第三产业占比/% 主要国家和地区 60及以上 美国、希腊、意大利、葡萄牙、西班牙等 50~59 法国、爱尔兰、塞尔维亚、奥地利 40~49 日本、芬兰、德国、罗马尼亚 表 3 主要国家和地区碳达峰时人口增长率
Table 3. Population growth rate in major countries and regions with carbon dioxide peaking
国家和
地区人口增长
率/%国家和
地区人口增长
率/%国家和
地区人口增长
率/%美国 0.92 德国 0.73 意大利 0.65 法国 0.41 英国 0.42 日本 −0.02 表 4 承诺碳中和目标年的国家和地区
Table 4. Target year of countries and regions committed to carbon neutrality
承诺性质 2030—
2035年2040—
2045年2050年 2060年 21世纪后期 法律规定 瑞典 英国、法国、匈牙利、
丹麦、新西兰、德国立法草案 西班牙、智利、斐济 政策宣示 冰岛、奥地利 加拿大、韩国、日本、
南非、瑞士、葡萄牙中国 提交联合国的长期战略 乌拉圭 斯洛伐克、哥斯达黎加、马绍尔群岛 新加坡 执政党政府工作计划 芬兰 爱尔兰、美国其他州* 行政命令 美国加州 注:*表示拜登竞选网站公布的《清洁能源革命和环境正义计划》中提到2050年之前,美国实现100%的清洁能源经济和净零排放。 -
[1] 中共中央, 国务院. 中共中央 国务院关于完整准确全面贯彻新发展理念做好碳达峰碳中和工作的意见[A/OL]. (2021-10-24)[2022-4-29]. http:// www.gov.on/index.htm. [2] 中共中央, 国务院. 中共中央 国务院关于深入打好污染防治攻坚战的意见[A/OL]. (2021-11-07)[2022-4-29]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/zcwj/zyygwj/202111/t20211108_959456.shtml. [3] 姜华, 李艳萍, 高健, 等.关于统筹建立二氧化碳排放总量控制制度的思考[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(1):1-5. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210778JIANG H, LI Y P, GAO J, et al. Thoughts on the overall establishment of total carbon dioxide emission control system[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(1):1-5. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210778 [4] 张楠, 张保留, 吕连宏, 等.碳达峰国家达峰特征与启示[J]. 中国环境科学,2022,42(4):1912-1921. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2022.04.049ZHANG N, ZHANG B L, LÜ L H, et al. Peaking characteristics and enlightenment based on carbon peak countries[J]. China Environmental Science,2022,42(4):1912-1921. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2022.04.049 [5] 翟桂英, 王树堂, 崔永丽, 等.全球主要经济体碳中和愿景、实施举措及对我国的启示[J]. 环境保护,2021,49(11):69-72.ZHAI G Y, WANG S T, CUI Y L, et al. The goals, measures and enlightment of carbon-neutrtion in major global economies[J]. Environmental Protection,2021,49(11):69-72. [6] 杨儒浦, 冯相昭, 赵梦雪, 等.欧洲碳中和实现路径探讨及其对中国的启示[J]. 环境与可持续发展,2021,46(3):45-52.YANG R P, FENG X Z, ZHAO M X, et al. Study on European carbon neutrality pathway and its enlightenment to China[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development,2021,46(3):45-52. [7] 陈怡, 刘强, 田川, 等.部分国家长期温室气体低排放发展战略比较分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2019,15(6):633-640.CHEN Y, LIU Q, TIAN C, et al. Comparison analysis of the long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies of main countries[J]. Climate Change Research,2019,15(6):633-640. [8] 张贤, 郭偲悦, 孔慧, 等.碳中和愿景的科技需求与技术路径[J]. 中国环境管理,2021,13(1):65-70. doi: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2021.01.065ZHANG X, GUO S Y, KONG H, et al. Technology demands and approach of carbon neutrality vision[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2021,13(1):65-70. doi: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2021.01.065 [9] 冯相昭.全球油气行业积极应对双碳新局[J]. 中国石化,2021(6):72-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-457X.2021.06.024 [10] 张金岭.欧洲生态绿党在法国掀起“绿色浪潮”及其影响[J]. 当代世界,2020(11):71-79. [11] 周伟, 米红.中国能源消费排放的CO2测算[J]. 中国环境科学,2010,30(8):1142-1148.ZHOU W, MI H. Calculation on energy-related CO2 emissions in China (2010-2050)[J]. China Environmental Science,2010,30(8):1142-1148. [12] WANG S J, ZHOU C S, LI G D, et al. CO2, economic growth, and energy consumption in China's provinces: investigating the spatiotemporal and econometric characteristics of China's CO2 emissions[J]. Ecological Indicators,2016,69:184-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.022 [13] 马丁, 陈文颖. 中国2030年碳排放峰值水平及达峰路径研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(增刊1): 1-4.MA D, CHEN W Y. Analysis of China's 2030 carbon emission peak level and peak path[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(Suppl 1): 1-4. [14] 陈怡, 田川, 曹颖, 等.中国电力行业碳排放达峰及减排潜力分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2020,16(5):632-640.CHEN Y, TIAN C, CAO Y, et al. Research on peaking carbon emissions of power sector in China and the emissions mitigation analysis[J]. Climate Change Research,2020,16(5):632-640. [15] 胡鞍钢.中国实现2030年前碳达峰目标及主要途径[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(3):1-15.HU A G. China's goal of achieving carbon peak by 2030 and its main approaches[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition),2021,21(3):1-15. [16] AN R Y, YU B Y, LI R, et al. Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China's iron and steel industry[J]. Applied Energy,2018,226:862-880. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.044 [17] ZHANG X, ZHAO X R, JIANG Z J, et al. How to achieve the 2030 CO2 emission-reduction targets for China's industrial sector: retrospective decomposition and prospective trajectories[J]. Global Environmental Change,2017,44:83-97. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.003 [18] WANG J, RODRIGUES J F D, HU M M, et al. The evolution of Chinese industrial CO2 emissions 2000-2050: a review and meta-analysis of historical drivers, projections and policy goals[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2019,116:109433. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109433 [19] 王勇, 王颖.中国实现碳减排双控目标的可行性及最优路径: 能源结构优化的视角[J]. 中国环境科学,2019,39(10):4444-4455. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2019.10.050WANG Y, WANG Y. Feasibility and optimal pathway of China's double targets for carbon reduction: the perspective of energy structure optimizationFull text replacement[J]. China Environmental Science,2019,39(10):4444-4455. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2019.10.050 [20] 白永秀, 鲁能, 李双媛.双碳目标提出的背景、挑战、机遇及实现路径[J]. 中国经济评论,2021(5):10-13. [21] YAO C S, CHEN C Y, LI M. Analysis of rural residential energy consumption and corresponding carbon emissions in China[J]. Energy Policy,2012,41:445-450. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.005 [22] 王元龙.构建中国绿色金融体系的战略研究[J]. 经济研究参考,2011(39):2-25. □ doi: 10.16110/j.cnki.issn2095-3151.2011.39.001