基于“价值规范-学科基质与评价模式-制度安排”的中国政策环评范式研究与应用初探

徐千淇; 张亚宁; 包存宽

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220740

基于“价值规范-学科基质与评价模式-制度安排”的中国政策环评范式研究与应用初探

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220740

徐千淇^{1, 2,},
张亚宁³,
包存宽^{1, 2, ,}

1.
复旦大学环境科学与工程系
2.
上海市生态环境治理政策模拟与评估重点实验室, 复旦大学
3.
山东省建设项目环境评审服务中心

基金项目: 上海市生态环境局项目（沪环科〔2021〕第18号）

详细信息

作者简介:
徐千淇（1998—），男，硕士研究生，主要从事战略环评与政策分析研究，20210740110@fudan.edu.cn

通讯作者:
包存宽（1971—），男，教授，主要从事战略环境评价、环境规划与环境政策、环境治理研究，baock@fudan.edu.cn

中图分类号: X820
计量
- 文章访问数: 451
- HTML全文浏览量: 221
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-23
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-22

A preliminary exploration on the paradigm and application of China's policy strategic environmental assessment: based on "value norm-disciplinary substrate and evaluation model-institutional arrangement"

XU Qianqi^{1, 2
,},
ZHANG Yaning³,
BAO Cunkuan^{1, 2
, ,}

1.
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University
2.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Policy Simulation and Assessment for Ecology and Environment Governance, Fudan University
3.
Shandong Province Environmental Assessment and Service Center of Construction Projects

摘要

摘要:
当前我国政策环评范式尚未形成普遍共识。梳理了政策与政策环评的相关概念，将政策划分为广义政策、狭义政策、政策工具3个层次，并认为政策环评对象应是狭义政策，政策分析不仅应将该政策置于其所属政策体系即广义政策中，还须从该政策方案所包含的相关政策工具入手，分析政策之间的关系以促进形成政策合力；提出了涵盖“价值规范-学科基质与评价模式-制度安排”等层次的政策环评范式，并以某省可再生能源政策为例进行了初步应用。最后就政策环评加强理论研究、积累实践经验、推进制度建设、最终构建政策环评范式等方面提出建议。
- 政策环评 /
- 战略环评 /
- 政策 /
- 政策体系 /
- 政策过程
Abstract:
There is no paradigm of policy strategic environmental assessment (SEA) commonly agreed in China. The relevant definitions of policies were sorted out into broad sense, narrow sense and policy instruments. Policies in a narrow sense should be the object of policy SEA. The practice of policy analysis should not only emphasize on policy coordination of policy instruments in the policy system consisting of policies in a broad sense, but also analyze the relationship between the policy and other policies from the perspective of relevant policy tools in the policy system to form a policy synergy. The paradigm of policy SEA, covering the levels of "value norm-disciplinary substrate and evaluation model- institutional arrangement", was proposed, and was preliminarily applied with a renewable energy policy of one province as an example. Suggestions included strengthening theoretical research on policy SEA, accumulating practical experience, promoting institutional construction, and finally establishing the paradigm of policy SEA.
- policy strategic environmental assessment /
- strategic environmental assessment /
- policy /
- policy system /
- policy process

HTML全文

图 1 政策环评的基本程序

Figure 1. The basic procedure of policy SEA

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 “政策内容-政策过程-政策体系”政策环评模式的某省实践

Figure 2. The practice of policy SEA pattern under content, procedure and system in a certain province

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(40)

[1]	李巍, 王华东, 王淑华.战略环境影响评价研究[J]. 环境科学进展,1995(3):1-6. LI W, WANG H D, WANG S H. Studies on strategic environmental impact assessment[J]. Advances in Environmental Science,1995(3):1-6.
[2]	任景明.建立政策评价制度确保科学发展[J]. 中国软科学,2005(6):25-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2005.06.006 REN J M. Establishing the institution of policy assessment to ensure the realization of scientific development[J]. China Soft Science,2005(6):25-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2005.06.006
[3]	耿海清, 李南锟, 李苗. 我国的政策分类和政策环评主要对象探讨[J/OL]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220740. GENG H Q, LI N K, LI M. Discussion on China′s policy classification and main objects of policy strategic environmental assessment [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022. doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220740.
[4]	耿海清, 李天威, 徐鹤.我国开展政策环评的必要性及其基本框架研究[J]. 中国环境管理,2019,11(6):23-27. doi: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2019.06.023 GENG H Q, LI T W, XU H. The necessity and basic framework of China's policy strategic environmental assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2019,11(6):23-27. doi: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2019.06.023
[5]	李海生, 李小敏, 赵玉婷, 等.基于文献计量分析的近40年国内外环境影响评价研究进展[J]. 环境科学研究,2022,35(5):1091-1101. LI H S, LI X M, ZHAO Y T, et al. Environmental impact assessment research in domestic and foreign literature in past four decades based on scientometric reviews[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2022,35(5):1091-1101.
[6]	马蔚纯, 林健枝, 陈立民, 等.战略环境评价(SEA)及其研究进展[J]. 环境科学,2000,21(5):107-112. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2000.05.027 MA W C, LIN J Z, CHEN L M, et al. Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and its development[J]. Enviromental Science,2000,21(5):107-112. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2000.05.027
[7]	徐鹤, 朱坦, 戴树桂,等. 战略环境影响评价(SEA)与可持续发展[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2000, 10(增刊1): 10-12. XU H, ZHU T, DAI S G, et al. Strategic environmental assessment: key tool in achieving sustainable development[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2000, 10(Suppl 1): 10-12.
[8]	田丰, 王文琪, 包存宽.以降碳为目标的逆向战略环境评价: 理念与模式[J]. 环境保护,2021,49(12):22-27. TIAN F, WANG W Q, BAO C K. Reverse strategic environmental assessment aiming at carbon reduction: ideas and models[J]. Environmental Protection,2021,49(12):22-27.
[9]	毛显强, 李向前, 涂莹燕, 等.农业贸易政策环境影响评价的案例研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(6):40-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.06.010 MAO X Q, LI X Q, TU Y Y, et al. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural trade policy: a wheat planting industry case study in Qian'an County, Hebei Province[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2005,15(6):40-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.06.010
[10]	吴玉萍, 胡涛, 毛显强, 等.贸易政策环境影响评价方法论初探[J]. 环境与可持续发展,2011,36(3):35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2011.03.008 WU Y P, HU T, MAO X Q, et al. On methodology of environmental impact assessment on trade policy[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development,2011,36(3):35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2011.03.008
[11]	张颖, 杨桂红, 陆霁, 等.开展林权制度改革政策环境影响评价促进林业绿色发展[J]. 环境与可持续发展,2012,37(2):5-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2012.02.002 ZHANG Y, YANG G H, LU J, et al. Promoting environmental impact assessment on forest tenure reform for green development of forestry in China[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development,2012,37(2):5-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2012.02.002
[12]	李巍, 杨志峰.重大经济政策环境影响评价初探: 中国汽车产业政策环境影响评价[J]. 中国环境科学,2000(2):114-118. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2000.02.005 LI W, YANG Z F. Preliminary study on environmental impact assessment of significant economic policies-EIA of China automobile industry development policy[J]. China Environmental Science,2000(2):114-118. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2000.02.005
[13]	王红梅, 何磊, 沈鹏, 等.规划环境影响评价中开展健康风险源头控制[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(1):61-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.009 WANG H M, HE L, SHEN P, et al. Analysis on source control of health risk in planning environmental impact assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2019,9(1):61-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.01.009
[14]	严强, 王强. 公共政策学[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2002: 5-6.
[15]	蒋硕亮. 公共政策学: 公共经济与管理·政策分析系列[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2018: 3-4.
[16]	拉雷 N 格斯顿. 公共政策的制定: 程序和原理[M]. 朱子文译. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 2001: 3.
[17]	张国庆. 现代公共政策导论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1997: 8.
[18]	药师寺泰藏. 公共政策[M]. 张丹译. 北京: 经济日报出版社, 1991.
[19]	EASTON D. The political system[J]. World Politics,1957,9(3):383-400. doi: 10.2307/2008920
[20]	LASSWELL H D, KAPLAN A. Power and society[M]. London: Yale University Press, 2017.
[21]	DYE T. Understanding public policy[M]. New York: Palgrave Press, 1972.
[22]	AGRANOFF R. Intergovernmental policy management: cooperative practices in federal systems[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007: 248-283.
[23]	刘庆飞, 李佳耀. 公共政策与法律规范关系研究[M]//2018年政府法制研究. 上海: 上海市行政法制研究所, 2018: 147-149. DOI:10.26914/c.cnkihy.2018.004106.
[24]	宁骚. 公共政策学[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018: 142.
[25]	朱侃, 郭小聪.公共就业政策范式变迁及其逻辑研究[J]. 求实,2019(5):42-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8487.2019.05.005 ZHU K, GUO X C. The paradigm shift of public employment policy and its logic[J]. Truth Seeking,2019(5):42-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8487.2019.05.005
[26]	贺东航, 孔繁斌.公共政策执行的中国经验[J]. 中国社会科学,2011(5):61-79. HE D H, KONG F B. China's experience in public policy implementation[J]. Social Sciences in China,2011(5):61-79.
[27]	包存宽, 王金南.面向生态文明的中国环境管理学: 历史使命与学术话语[J]. 中国环境管理,2019,11(1):5-10. BAO C K, WANG J N. Environmental management in China facing ecological civilization: historical mission and academic discourse[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2019,11(1):5-10.
[28]	冯平. 评价论[M]. 北京: 东方出版社, 1995: 74-109.
[29]	李武军, 黄炳南.中国低碳经济政策链范式研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(10):19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.10.004 LI W J, HUANG B N. Research on policy of China developing low-carbon economy based on policy chain paradigm[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2010,20(10):19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.10.004
[30]	王晓红, 张亦工.中国环境政策体系: 构建与发展: 基于生态文明的视角[J]. 山东财经大学学报,2021,33(5):43-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2670.2021.05.005 WANG X H, ZHANG Y G. Construction and development of China environmental policy system: from the perspective of ecological civilization[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Finance and Economics,2021,33(5):43-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2670.2021.05.005
[31]	张江雪, 张力小, 李丁.绿色技术创新: 制度障碍与政策体系[J]. 中国行政管理,2018(2):153-155.
[32]	王磊, 沈建法.空间规划政策在中国五年计划/规划体系中的演变[J]. 地理科学进展,2013,32(8):1195-1206. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.08.003 WANG L, SHEN J F. Evolution of spatial planning in the Five-Year Plan/Planning system of China[J]. Progress in Geography,2013,32(8):1195-1206. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.08.003
[33]	薛依欣. 现行政策体系下对涉海空间用途管制的思考[C]//面向高质量发展的空间治理: 2020中国城市规划年会论文集(13规划实施与管理), 2021: 515-524.
[34]	张国兴, 高秀林, 汪应洛, 等.我国节能减排政策协同的有效性研究: 1997—2011[J]. 管理评论,2015,27(12):3-17. ZHANG G X, GAO X L, WANG Y L, et al. Effectiveness of the coordination of energy conservation and emission reduction policies in China: from 1997 to 2011[J]. Management Review,2015,27(12):3-17.
[35]	张国兴, 高秀林, 汪应洛, 等.中国节能减排政策的测量、协同与演变: 基于1978—2013年政策数据的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(12):62-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2014.12.009 ZHANG G X, GAO X L, WANG Y L, et al. Measurement, coordination and evolution of energy conservation and emission reduction policies in China: based on the research of the policy data from 1978 to 2013[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2014,24(12):62-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2014.12.009
[36]	李东泉, 黎唯.省级新型城镇化规划文本传递中的流变分析[J]. 规划师,2017,33(9):85-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.09.014 LI D Q, LI W. Transmission and alteration of new urbanization planning textbook in provincial region[J]. Planners,2017,33(9):85-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.09.014
[37]	刘力, 白渭淋.区域经济一体化与行政区经济的空间效应研究: 基于“泛珠三角”区域合作与广东“双转移”的政策协同效应[J]. 经济地理,2010,30(11):1773-1778. LIU L, BAI W L. The spacial effects study on regional economic integration and administrative economy: based on the regional cooperation of pan pearl dealt and bi-transfer strategy of Guangdong[J]. Economic Geography,2010,30(11):1773-1778.
[38]	操小娟, 杜丹宁.政策协同视角下的主体功能区土地政策研究[J]. 行政论坛,2021,28(6):105-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2021.06.014 CAO X J, DU D N. Research on the land policy of the main functional area from the perspective of policy synergy[J]. Administrative Tribune,2021,28(6):105-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2021.06.014
[39]	MEIJERS E, STEAD D. Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved?a multi-disciplinary review[C]// Greening of policies: interlinkages and policy integration. Berlin: 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, 2004.
[40]	孙迎春.公共部门协作治理改革的新趋势: 以美国国家海洋政策协同框架为例[J]. 中国行政管理,2011(11):96-99. SUN Y C. A new trend of public sector reform: collaborative governance: taking the US national ocean policy as an example[J]. Chinese Public Administration,2011(11):96-99. ⊕