基于生态系统服务簇评价的长沙市生态修复优先区识别

蒋红波; 覃盟琳; 王政强; 罗丁丁; 吴欣芋

doi:10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220983

基于生态系统服务簇评价的长沙市生态修复优先区识别

doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20220983

蒋红波^{1, 3,},
覃盟琳^{2, 3, ,},
王政强^{1, 3},
罗丁丁^{1, 3},
吴欣芋^{1, 3}

1.
广西大学林学院
2.
广西大学土木建筑工程学院
3.
广西大学人居环境设计研究中心

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目 (52268008)

详细信息

作者简介:
蒋红波（1998—），男，硕士研究生，主要从事景观生态规划与生态修复研究，1050512327@qq.com

通讯作者:
覃盟琳（1978—），男，副教授，主要从事生态低碳规划研究，XDrenju@163.com

中图分类号: X171.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 380
- HTML全文浏览量: 382
- PDF下载量: 59
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-10
- 录用日期: 2023-04-21
- 修回日期: 2022-11-23
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-15

Identification of priority areas for ecological restoration based on evaluation of ecosystem service bundles：taking Changsha City as an example

JIANG Hongbo^{1, 3
,},
QIN Menglin^{2, 3
, ,},
WANG Zhengqiang^{1, 3},
LUO Dingding^{1, 3},
WU Xinyu^{1, 3}

1.
College of Forestry, Guangxi University
2.
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University
3.
Human Settlements Design and Research Center, Guangxi University

摘要

摘要:
为快速有效地划分长沙市生态修复优先级，构建了“生态系统服务簇—城市化强度”体系的生态修复优先区识别研究框架，运用生态系统服务价值计算模型、聚类分析、线性回归模型、空间统计等方法，识别研究区生态系统服务簇，对生态系统服务簇综合服务能力演变和城市化强度变化进行空间统计，进而识别出研究区生态修复优先区，并提出生态修复和保护策略。结果表明：城市扩张大量侵占城市周边土地，致使长沙市主城区4个生态系统服务簇在2000—2020年，有1 821个网格(占比为20.15%)发生了服务簇类型的改变；城市扩张破坏原有生态环境和景观格局，致使城市化发展对生态系统服务簇发展的影响始终是负面的，且随着城市化速度加快，其负面影响愈加明显；生态修复优先区被划分为5个等级，2 609个网格(占比为28.87%)需要进行生态修复，其中Ⅰ级生态修复优先区占比为13.53%，Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级占比分别为0.58%、12.53%、2.23%。Ⅰ级和Ⅲ级生态修复优先区应注重关键生态系统服务能力的提升，Ⅱ级和Ⅳ级生态修复优先区和生态保护区则应注重现有生态系统服务功能的保持。该方法能够快速定位高速城市化与生态系统受损同时发生的区域，并为不同分区修复策略的制定提供参考，在提升生态系统服务能力的同时，降低城市化对生态系统的负面影响。
- 生态修复 /
- 生态系统服务簇 /
- 优先区识别 /
- 长沙市
Abstract:
In order to quickly and effectively divide the priority of ecological restoration in Changsha City, a research framework for identifying the priority areas of territory space ecological restoration in the system of "ecosystem service bundle-urbanization intensity" was constructed. By using the calculation model of ecosystem service value, cluster analysis, linear regression model and spatial statistics, the ecosystem service bundles in the study area were indentified, as well as the evolution of the comprehensive service capacity of ecosystem service bundles and the change of urbanization intensity were analyzed by spatial statistics. The priority areas of ecological restoration in the study area were identified in turn, and ecological restoration and protection strategies were put forward. The results showed that urban expansion heavily encroached on the surrounding land, resulting in 1821 grids (accounting for 20.15%) of the four ecosystem service bundles in the main urban area of Changsha City changing their service bundle types from 2000 to 2020. Urban expansion destroyed the original ecological environment and landscape pattern, which made urbanization always have a negative impact on the development of ecosystem service bundles, and the negative impact became more and more obvious with the acceleration of urbanization. Ecological restoration priority areas were divided into five grades, and 2609 grids (accounting for 28.87%) needed ecological restoration, of which 13.53% were classified as Grade Ⅰ ecological restoration priority areas, with Grade Ⅱ accounting for 0.58%, Grade Ⅲ accounting for 12.53%, and Grade Ⅳ accounting for 2.23%. Priority areas of Grade Ⅰ and Ⅲ ecological restoration paid attention to the promotion of key ecosystem services, while those of Grade Ⅱ and Ⅳ ecological restoration and ecological protection areas paid attention to the maintenance of existing ecosystem services. This method could quickly locate the areas where high-speed urbanization and ecosystem damage occurred at the same time, and provide reference for the formulation of different zoning restoration strategies, which can improve the ecosystem service capacity and reduce the negative impact of urbanization on the ecosystem.
- ecological restoration /
- ecosystem service bundle /
- priority zone identification /
- Changsha City

HTML全文

图 1 研究区概况

Figure 1. Overview of the study area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 技术路线

Figure 2. Technology route

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同聚类数轮廓系数

Figure 3. Contour coefficient of different bundle numbers

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 各生态系统服务簇功能结构

注：图中数值为各生态系统服务类型在相应服务簇中的占比。

Figure 4. Functional structure of each ecosystem service bundle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 2000—2020年生态系统服务簇空间分布

Figure 5. Spatial distribution of ecosystem service bundles from 2000 to 2020

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 生态系统服务簇综合服务能力与城市化强度相关关系

Figure 6. Relationship between comprehensive service capacity of ecosystem service bundles and urbanization intensity in Changsha City at various periods

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 生态系统修复优先区

Figure 7. Priority areas for ecosystem restoration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 单位面积生态系统服务价值当量^[28-29]

Table 1. Ecosystem service value equivalent per unit area 元/hm²　

生态系统服务		旱地	水田	林地	草地	水系	湿地	建设用地	未利用地
一级类	二级类	旱地	水田	林地	草地	水系	湿地	建设用地	未利用地
供给服务	食物生产	2199.20	3518.71	653.29	603.70	2069.83	1319.52	0	0
	原料生产	1034.92	232.86	1500.63	888.30	595.08	1293.65	0	0
	水资源供给	51.75	−6804.57	776.19	491.59	21448.63	6701.08	0	0
调节服务	气体调节	1733.48	2871.89	4935.26	3122.00	1992.21	4915.85	0	51.75
	气候调节	931.42	1474.76	14766.96	8253.46	5924.89	9314.24	0	0
	净化环境	258.73	439.84	4327.24	2725.28	14359.46	9314.24	0	258.73
	水文调节	698.57	7037.43	9663.53	6045.63	264524.53	62690.04	−18628.49	77.62
支持服务	土壤保持	2664.91	25.87	6008.98	3803.32	2406.18	5976.64	10168.05	51.75
	维持养分循环	310.47	491.59	459.24	293.23	181.11	465.71	0	0
	生物多样性	336.35	543.33	5472.12	3458.34	6597.59	20361.97	0	51.75
文化服务	美学景观	155.24	232.86	2399.71	1526.50	4889.98	12237.88	0	25.87

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)

[1]	杨宜男, 李敬, 王立, 等.长三角地区城市化对典型生态系统服务供需的影响[J]. 自然资源学报,2022,37(6):1555-1571. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220613 YANG Y N, LI J, WANG L, et al. Impact of urbanization on supply and demand of typical ecosystem services in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2022,37(6):1555-1571. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220613
[2]	PENG J, LIU Y, CORSTANJE R, et al. Promoting sustainable landscape pattern for landscape sustainability[J]. Landscape Ecology,2021,36(7):1839-1844. doi: 10.1007/s10980-021-01271-1
[3]	蔡振饶, 方朝阳, 何清华, 等.基于景观聚类的南昌市主城区城乡梯度识别及其生态系统服务响应[J]. 环境科学研究,2022,35(3):806-817. CAI Z R, FANG C Y, HE Q H, et al. Urban-rural gradient identification and ecosystem service response in main urban area of Nanchang based on landscape clustering[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2022,35(3):806-817.
[4]	FOLEY J A, DEFRIES R, ASNER G P, et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science,2005,309(5734):570-574. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772
[5]	TAYLOR L, HAHS A K, HOCHULI D F. Wellbeing and urban living: nurtured by nature[J]. Urban Ecosystems,2018,21(6):1227-1228. doi: 10.1007/s11252-018-0788-0
[6]	FISHER J C, BICKNELL J E, IRVINE K N, et al. Exploring how urban nature is associated with human wellbeing in a neotropical city[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2021,212:104119. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104119
[7]	LIU Z H, HUANG Q D, ZHOU Y, et al. Spatial identification of restored priority areas based on ecosystem service bundles and urbanization effects in a megalopolis area[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2022,308:114627. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114627
[8]	李开明.寻根究底量体裁衣推陈出新: 山水林田湖草生态保护修复的三个重要环节[J]. 中国生态文明,2019(1):64-65. LI K M. Explore the root of the matter, tailor the measures to suit the circumstances and bring forth the new: three important links of ecological protection and restoration of grass in Mountain-River-Forest-Farmland-Lake-Grass system[J]. China Ecological Civilization,2019(1):64-65.
[9]	曹宇, 王嘉怡, 李国煜.国土空间生态修复: 概念思辨与理论认知[J]. 中国土地科学,2019,33(7):1-10. CAO Y, WANG J Y, LI G Y. Ecological restoration foe territorial space: basic concepts and foundations[J]. China Land Science,2019,33(7):1-10.
[10]	袁兴中, 陈鸿飞, 扈玉兴.国土空间生态修复: 理论认知与技术范式[J]. 西部人居环境学刊,2020,35(4):1-8. YANG X Z, CHEN H F, HU Y X. Ecological restoration of territorial space: theoretical cognition and technological paradigm[J]. Journal of Human Settlements in West China,2020,35(4):1-8.
[11]	蔡海生, 陈艺, 查东平, 等.基于主导功能的国土空间生态修复分区的原理与方法[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(15):261-270. CAI H S, CHEN Y, ZHA D P, et al. Principle and method for ecological restoration zoning of territorial space based on the dominant function[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(15):261-270.
[12]	刘春芳, 李鹏杰, 刘立程, 等.西北生态脆弱区省域国土空间生态修复分区[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(17):254-263. LIU C F, LI P J, LIU L C, et al. Ecological restoration zoning of provincial territorial space in the ecologically fragile areas of northwest China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(17):254-263.
[13]	秦钦兰, 尹海伟, 朱梓铭, 等.柳州市国土空间生态修复区划策略研究[J]. 规划师,2020,36(14):56-62. QIN Q L, YIN H W, ZHU Z M, et al. Zoning strategy of ecological restoration in Liuzhou national land-space plan[J]. Planners,2020,36(14):56-62.
[14]	覃盟琳, 朱梓铭, 胡城旗, 等.市县国土空间生态修复分区方法与修复策略研究: 以崇左市天等县为例[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版),2020,45(4):802-815. QIN M L, ZHU Z M, HU C Q, et al. Research on zoning methods and strategies of ecological restoration of territorial space at municipal and county level: a case study of Tiandeng County, Chongzuo City[J]. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition),2020,45(4):802-815.
[15]	宫清华, 张虹鸥, 叶玉瑶, 等.人地系统耦合框架下国土空间生态修复规划策略: 以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 地理研究,2020,39(9):2176-2188. GONG Q H, ZHANG H O, YE Y Y, et al. Planning strategy of land space ecological restoration under the framework of man-land system coupling: taking the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao great bay as an example[J]. Geographical Research,2020,39(9):2176-2188.
[16]	韩博, 金晓斌, 项晓敏, 等.基于“要素—景观—系统”框架的江苏省长江沿线生态修复格局分析与对策[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(1):141-161. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200113 HAN B, JIN X B, XIANG X M, et al. Exploration of ecological restoration pattern and countermeasure along the Yangtze River in Jiangsu Province based on the "element-landscape-system" framework[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(1):141-161. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200113
[17]	KAREIVA P, WATTS S, MCDONALD R, et al. Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare[J]. Science,2007,316(5833):1866-1869. doi: 10.1126/science.1140170
[18]	RAUDSEPP-HEARNE C, PETERSON G D, BENNETT E M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(11):5242-5247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107
[19]	BENNETT E M, PETERSON G D, GORDON L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology Letters,2009,12(12):1394-1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
[20]	申嘉澍, 梁泽, 刘来保, 等.雄安新区生态系统服务簇权衡与协同[J]. 地理研究,2020,39(1):79-91. SHEN J S, LIANG Z, LIU L B, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem service bundles in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Geographical Research,2020,39(1):79-91.
[21]	齐麟, 张月, 许东, 等.东北森林屏障带生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J]. 生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3401-3411. QI L, ZHANG Y, XU D, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in forest barrier belt of northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2021,40(11):3401-3411.
[22]	CAO Y, LI G, TIAN Y, et al. Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, bundles and hotspot identification with cropland management in the coastal Hangzhou Bay area of China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 97: 104689.
[23]	冯兆, 彭建, 吴健生.基于生态系统服务簇的深圳市生态系统服务时空演变轨迹研究[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(8):2545-2554. FENG Z, PENG J, WU J S. Ecosystem service bundles based approach to exploring the trajectories of ecosystem service spatiotemporal change: a case study of Shenzhen City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(8):2545-2554.
[24]	宋家鹏, 陈松林.基于生态系统服务簇的福州市生态系统服务格局[J]. 应用生态学报,2021,32(3):1045-1053. SONG J P, CHEN S L. Ecosystem service pattern of Fuzhou City based on ecosystem service bundles[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2021,32(3):1045-1053.
[25]	闫晓露, 李欣媛, 刘澄浩, 等.生态系统服务簇空间演变轨迹及其社会-生态驱动的地理探测: 以大连市为例[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(14):5734-5747. YAN X L, LI X Y, LIU C H, et al. Spatial evolution trajectory of ecosystem service bundles and its social-ecological driven by geographical exploretion: a case study of Dalian[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(14):5734-5747.
[26]	岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 等.基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(1):149-158. YUE W Z, HOU L, XIA H X, et al. Territorially ecological restoration zoning and optimization strategy in Guyuan City of Ningxia, China: based on the balance of ecosystem service supply and demand[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2022,33(1):149-158.
[27]	湖南省人民政府. 国家发改委批复《长株潭都市圈发展规划》[EB/OL]. (2022-02-25)[2022-10-03]. http://www.hunan.gov.cn/hnszf/hnyw/zwdt/202202/t20220225_22489406.html.
[28]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254. XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[29]	李淑娟, 高琳.胶州湾北岸滨海地区4个时期生态系统服务价值和生态功能区划分研究[J]. 湿地科学,2020,18(2):129-140. LI S J, GAO L. Ecosystem service values for 4 periods and ecological function zoning of coastal wetlands on north shore of Jiaozhou Bay[J]. Wetland Science,2020,18(2):129-140.
[30]	朱连江, 马炳先, 赵学泉.基于轮廓系数的聚类有效性分析[J]. 计算机应用,2010,30(S2):139-141. ZHU L J, MA B X, ZHAO X Q. Clustering validity analysis based on silhouette coefficient[J]. Journal of Computer Applications,2010,30(S2):139-141.
[31]	侯春飞, 韩永伟, 孟晓杰, 等.雄安新区1995—2019年土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2021,11(1):65-73. HOU C F, HAN Y W, MENG X J, et al. Effects of land-use change on ecosystem service values in Xiong'an New Area from 1995 to 2019[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(1):65-73.
[32]	丘海红, 胡宝清, 张泽.基于土地利用变化的广西近20年生态系统服务价值研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2022,12(5):1455-1465. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210352 QIU H H, HU B Q, ZHANG Z. Study on ecosystem service value of Guangxi in the past 20 years based on land use change[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(5):1455-1465. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210352
[33]	MADRIGAL-MARTINEZ S, LUIS MIRALLES I GARCIA J. Assessment method and scale of observation influence ecosystem service bundles[J]. Land,2020,9(10):392. doi: 10.3390/land9100392
[34]	欧阳晓, 朱翔, 贺清云.城市化与生态系统服务的空间交互关系研究: 以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(20):7502-7513. OUYANG X, ZHU X, HE Q Y. Spatial interaction between urbanisation and ecosystem services: a case study in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(20):7502-7513. ⊕